The bitcode reader expected that the pointers are typed, so that it can extract the function type for the assembly so `bitc::CST_CODE_INLINEASM` did not explicitly store said function type. I'm not really sure how the upgrade path will look for existing bitcode, but i think we can easily support opaque pointers going forward, by simply storing the function type. Reviewed By: #opaque-pointers, nikic Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116341 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| BitWriter.cpp | ||
| BitcodeWriter.cpp | ||
| BitcodeWriterPass.cpp | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| ValueEnumerator.cpp | ||
| ValueEnumerator.h | ||