31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| awk_oct.pass.cpp | ||
| bad_backref.pass.cpp | ||
| bad_ctype.pass.cpp | ||
| bad_escape.pass.cpp | ||
| bad_range.pass.cpp | ||
| bad_repeat.pass.cpp | ||
| copy.pass.cpp | ||
| deduct.fail.cpp | ||
| deduct.pass.cpp | ||
| default.pass.cpp | ||
| il_flg.pass.cpp | ||
| iter_iter.pass.cpp | ||
| iter_iter_flg.pass.cpp | ||
| ptr.pass.cpp | ||
| ptr_flg.pass.cpp | ||
| ptr_size.pass.cpp | ||
| ptr_size_flg.pass.cpp | ||
| string.pass.cpp | ||
| string_flg.pass.cpp | ||