Louis Dionne 31cbe0f240 [libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite ... C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926		2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
..
PR23141_invoke_not_constexpr.pass.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
bind_return_type.pass.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
copy.pass.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
invoke_function_object.pass.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
invoke_int_0.pass.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
invoke_lvalue.pass.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
invoke_rvalue.pass.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
invoke_void_0.pass.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00
nested.pass.cpp	[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite	2020-06-03 09:37:22 -04:00