Reland with changes: the test modified in this change originally failed
on a Debian/x86_64 builder, and I suspect the cause was that lldb looked
up the line location for an artificial frame by subtracting 1 from the
frame's address. For artificial frames, the subtraction must not happen
because the address is already exact.
---
lldb currently guesses the address to use when creating an artificial
frame (i.e., a frame constructed by determining the sequence of (tail)
calls which must have happened).
Guessing the address creates problems -- use the actual address provided
by the DW_AT_call_pc attribute instead.
Depends on D76336.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76337
03e29e2c19