59 lines
		
	
	
		
			1.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			LLVM
		
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			59 lines
		
	
	
		
			1.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			LLVM
		
	
	
	
; RUN: llc -march=avr -print-after=expand-isel-pseudos -cgp-freq-ratio-to-skip-merge=10 < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
; Because `switch` seems to trigger Machine Basic Blocks to be ordered
 | 
						|
; in a different order than they were constructed, this exposes an
 | 
						|
; error in the `expand-isel-pseudos` pass. Specifically, it thought we
 | 
						|
; could always fallthrough to a newly-constructed MBB. However,
 | 
						|
; there's no guarantee that either of the constructed MBBs need to
 | 
						|
; occur immediately after the currently-focused one!
 | 
						|
;
 | 
						|
; This issue manifests in a CFG that looks something like this:
 | 
						|
;
 | 
						|
; BB#2: derived from LLVM BB %finish
 | 
						|
;     Predecessors according to CFG: BB#0 BB#1
 | 
						|
;         %vreg0<def> = PHI %vreg3, <BB#0>, %vreg5, <BB#1>
 | 
						|
;         %vreg7<def> = LDIRdK 2
 | 
						|
;         %vreg8<def> = LDIRdK 1
 | 
						|
;         CPRdRr %vreg2, %vreg0, %SREG<imp-def>
 | 
						|
;         BREQk <BB#6>, %SREG<imp-use>
 | 
						|
;     Successors according to CFG: BB#5(?%) BB#6(?%)
 | 
						|
;
 | 
						|
; The code assumes it the fallthrough block after this is BB#5, but
 | 
						|
; it's actually BB#3! To be proper, there should be an unconditional
 | 
						|
; jump tying this block to BB#5.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
define i8 @select_must_add_unconditional_jump(i8 %arg0, i8 %arg1) unnamed_addr {
 | 
						|
entry-block:
 | 
						|
  switch i8 %arg0, label %dead [
 | 
						|
    i8 0, label %zero
 | 
						|
    i8 1, label %one
 | 
						|
  ]
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
zero:
 | 
						|
  br label %finish
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
one:
 | 
						|
  br label %finish
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
finish:
 | 
						|
  %predicate = phi i8 [ 50, %zero ], [ 100, %one ]
 | 
						|
  %is_eq = icmp eq i8 %arg1, %predicate
 | 
						|
  %result = select i1 %is_eq, i8 1, i8 2
 | 
						|
  ret i8 %result
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
dead:
 | 
						|
  ret i8 0
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
; This check may be a bit brittle, but the important thing is that the
 | 
						|
; basic block containing `select` needs to contain explicit jumps to
 | 
						|
; both successors.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
; CHECK: BB#2: derived from LLVM BB %finish
 | 
						|
; CHECK: BREQk <[[BRANCHED:BB#[0-9]+]]>
 | 
						|
; CHECK: RJMPk <[[DIRECT:BB#[0-9]+]]>
 | 
						|
; CHECK: Successors according to CFG
 | 
						|
; CHECK-SAME-DAG: {{.*}}[[BRANCHED]]
 | 
						|
; CHECK-SAME-DAG: {{.*}}[[DIRECT]]
 | 
						|
; CHECK: BB#3: derived from LLVM BB
 |