826997c462
In a new Range class was introduced to simplify and the Disassembler API
and reduce duplication. It unintentionally broke the
SBFrame::Disassemble functionality because it unconditionally converts
the number of instructions to a Range{Limit::Instructions,
num_instructions}. This is subtly different from the previous behavior,
where now we're passing a Range and assume it's valid in the callee, the
original code would propagate num_instructions and the callee would
compare the value and decided between disassembling instructions or
bytes.
Unfortunately the existing tests was not particularly strict:
disassembly = frame.Disassemble()
self.assertNotEqual(len(disassembly), 0, "Disassembly was empty.")
This would pass because without this patch we'd disassemble zero
instructions, resulting in an error:
(lldb) script print(lldb.frame.Disassemble())
error: error reading data from section __text
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89925
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Makefile | ||
| TestDisassembleBreakpoint.py | ||
| TestFrameDisassemble.py | ||
| main.cpp | ||