We've said that we'll remove `std::function` from C++03 in LLVM 16, so we might as well do it now before we forget.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Mordante
Spies: jloser, Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135868
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d8 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
compressed_pair is widely used in the library, but most of the uses don't use the tuple parts. To avoid including <tuple> everywhere, use the forward declaration instead in compressed_pair.h
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133331
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
`std::function` has been deprecated for a few releases now. Remove it with an option to opt-back-in with a note that this option will be removed in LLVM 16.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: #libc_vendors, EricWF, jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127908
This mostly copys the `<experimental/functional>` stuff and updates the code to current libc++ style.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: nlopes, adamdebreceni, arichardson, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121074
This test only fails on x86_64 clang-cl, not for i386.
(The root cause is still not explored, thus the FIXME is still
relevant.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124994
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
AIX's system header provides these C++ overloads for compatibility with
older XL C++ implementations, but they can be disabled by defining
__LIBC_NO_CPP_MATH_OVERLOADS__ since AIX 7.2 TL 5 SP 3.
Since D109078 landed clang will define this macro when using libc++ on
AIX and we already run the lit tests with it too. This change will
enable the overloads in libc++'s math.h and we'll continue to require
the compiler to define the macro going forward.
Reviewed By: ldionne, jsji, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102172
co-authored-by: Jason Liu <jasonliu.development@gmail.com>
This follows the general direction of D118736 that
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES` does *not* guard anything outside
of the `std::ranges::` namespace itself. This means we must permit
`ranges::less` etc. in no-ranges mode; that seems fine to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120139
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736
Remove a bunch of LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG. This is the result of a
rabbithole to re-eliminate the workaround I introduced into
std::cref in D117953. It turns out that Clang's C++03 mode
(the only compiler we care about C++03 for) now supports all
the things we were originally eschewing via LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG;
we can fully support these reference_wrapper features in
C++03 mode, and un-XFAIL the relevant tests.
Drive-by constexprify a few more tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117974
... it's easier to suppress warnings internally, where we can detect the compiler.
* Rename `TEST_COMPILER_C1XX` to `TEST_COMPILER_MSVC`
* Rename all `TEST_WORKAROUND_C1XX_<meow>` to `TEST_WORKAROUND_MSVC_<meow>`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117422
Before this patch, the user needed to specialize both of
`is_placeholder<MyType>` and `is_placeholder<const MyType>`.
After this patch, only the former is needed (although the
latter is harmless if provided).
The new tests don't actually fail unless return type deduction
is used, which is a C++14 feature. Specializing `is_placeholder`
is still allowed in C++11, though.
Fixes#51095.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116388
However, whether applications rely on the std::bad_function_call vtable
being in the dylib is still controlled by the ABI macro, since changing
that would be an ABI break.
Also separate preprocessor definitions for whether to use a key function
and whether to use a `bad_function_call`-specific `what` message
(`what` message is mandated by [LWG2233](http://wg21.link/LWG2233)).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92397
This changes adds the pipeline config for both 32-bit and 64-bit AIX targets. As well, we add a lit feature `LIBCXX-AIX-FIXME` which is used to mark the failing tests which remain to be investigated on AIX, so that the CI produces a clean build.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111359
Make test_allocator etc. constexpr-friendly so they can be used to test constexpr string and possibly constexpr vector
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110994
Those creep up from time to time. We need to use `int main(int, char**)`
because in freestanding mode, `main` doesn't get special treatment and
special mangling, so we setup a symbol alias from the mangled version of
`main(int, char**)` to `extern "C" main`. That only works if all the tests
are consistent about how they define their main function.
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.
Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
Vendors take libc++ and ship it in various ways. Some vendors might
ship it differently from what upstream LLVM does, i.e. the install
location might be different, some ABI properties might differ, etc.
In the past few years, I've come across several instances where
having a place to test some of these properties would have been
incredibly useful. I also just got bitten by the lack of tests
of that kind, so I'm adding some now.
The tests added by this commit for Apple platforms have numerous
TODOs that capture discrepancies between the upstream LLVM CMake
and the slightly-modified build we perform internally to produce
Apple's system libc++. In the future, the goal would be to upstream
all those differences so that it's possible to build a faithful
Apple system libc++ with the upstream LLVM sources only.
But this isn't only useful for Apple - this lays out the path for
any vendor being able to add their own checks (either upstream or
downstream) to libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110736
Before this patch, we had features named 'libc++', 'libstdc++' and
'msvc' to describe the three implementations that use our test suite.
This patch renames them to 'stdlib=libc++', 'stdlib=libstdc++', etc
to avoid confusion between MSVC's STL and the MSVC compiler (or Clang
in MSVC mode).
Furthermore, this prepares the terrain for adding support for additional
"implementations" to the test suite. Basically, I'd like to be able to
treat Apple's libc++ differently from LLVM's libc++ for the purpose of
testing, because those effectively behave in different ways in some aspects.
All supported compilers have supported deduction guides in C++17 for a
while, so this isn't necessary anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108213
Since we officially don't support several older compilers now, we can
drop a lot of the markup in the test suite. This helps keep the test
suite simple and makes sure that UNSUPPORTED annotations don't rot.
This is the first patch of a series that will remove annotations for
compilers that are now unsupported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107787
This patch fixes the constrains on the __perfect_forward constructor
and its call operators, which were incorrect. In particular, it makes
sure that we closely follow [func.require], which basically says that
we must deliver the bound arguments with the appropriate value category
or make the call ill-formed, but not silently fall back to using a
different value category.
As a fly-by, this patch also:
- Adds types __bind_front_t and __not_fn_t to make the result of
calling bind_front and not_fn more opaque, and improve diagnostics
for users.
- Adds a bunch of tests for bind_front and remove some that are now
redundant.
- Adds some missing _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI annotations.
Immense thanks to @tcanens for raising awareness about this issue, and
providing help with the = delete bits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107199
C++03 didn't support `explicit` conversion operators;
but Clang's C++03 mode does, as an extension, so we can use it.
This lets us make the conversion explicit in `std::function` (even in '03),
and remove some silly metaprogramming in `std::basic_ios`.
Drive-by improvements to the tests for these operators, in addition
to making sure all these tests also run in `c++03` mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104682
This also provides some of the scaffolding needed by D102992 and D101729, and mops up after D101730 etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103055
This reverts a224bf8ec4 and fixes the
underlying issue.
The underlying issue is simply that MSVC headers contains a define
like "#define __in", where __in is one macro in the MSVC Source
Code Annotation Language, defined in sal.h
Just use a different variable name than "__in"
__indirectly_readable_impl, and add "__in" to nasty_macros.h just
like the existing __out. (Also adding a couple more potentially
conflicting ones.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101613
Nikolas Klauser