Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482
from libcxx/test/std/input.output/string.streams/stringbuf/stringbuf.virtuals/
[NFC] As part of using inclusive language within the llvm project, this
patch rewords comments to remove sanity check.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124391
We shouldn't be calling `move` via ADL -- and neither should anybody
in the wild be calling it via ADL, so it's not like we need to test
this ADL ability of `move` in particular.
Reviewed as part of D119860.
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.
Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
With the STL containers, I didn't enable move operations in C++03 mode
because that would change the overload resolution for things that today
are copy operations. With iostreams, though, the copy operations aren't
present at all, and so I see no problem with enabling move operations
even in (Clang's greatly extended) C++03 mode.
Clang's C++03 mode does not support delegating constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104310
When porting libc++ to embedded systems, it can be useful to drop support
for localization, which these systems don't implement or care about.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90072
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
As a result of this change, the basic_stringbuf constructor that
takes a mode ends up leaving __hm_ set to 0, causing the comparison
"__hm_ - __str_.data() < __noff" in seekoff() to succeed, which caused
the function to incorrectly return -1. The fix is to account for the
possibility of __hm_ being 0 when computing the distance from __hm_
to the start of the string.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41319
llvm-svn: 321124
Summary:
[libcxx] Fix basic_stringbuf constructor
The C++ Standard [stringbuf.cons]p1 defines the effects of the basic_stringbuf
constructor that takes ios_base::openmode as follows:
Effects: Constructs an object of class basic_stringbuf, initializing the
base class with basic_streambuf(), and initializing mode with which.
Postconditions: str() == "".
The default constructor of basic_streambuf shall initialize all its
pointer member objects to null pointers [streambuf.cons]p1.
Currently libc++ calls "str(string_type());" in the aforementioned constructor
setting basic_streambuf's pointers to a non-null value.
This patch removes the call (note that the postcondition str() == ""
remains valid because __str_ is default-initialized) and adds a test checking
that the basic_streambuf's pointers are null after construction.
Thanks Mikhail Maltsev for the patch.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40707
llvm-svn: 320604
Louis Dionne