Adding `[[nodiscard]]` to functions is a conforming extension and done extensively in the MSVC STL.
Reviewed By: ldionne, EricWF, #libc
Spies: #libc_vendors, cjdb, mgrang, jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128267
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
After checking the libc++abi.dylib shipped in macOS 10.13, I can confirm
that it contains the align_val_t variants of operator new and operator
delete. However, the libc++abi.dylib shipped on macOS 10.12 does not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129198
Display 'static_assert failed: message' instead of
'static_assert failed "message"' to be consistent
with other implementations and be slightly more
readable.
Reviewed By: #libc, aaron.ballman, philnik, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128844
`__GCC_CONSTRUCTIVE_SIZE` and `__GCC_DESTRUCTIVE_SIZE` are available since GCC 12. I'm assuming clang will also implement these for compatability with libstdc++.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: h-vetinari, libcxx-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122276
This changes adds the pipeline config for both 32-bit and 64-bit AIX targets. As well, we add a lit feature `LIBCXX-AIX-FIXME` which is used to mark the failing tests which remain to be investigated on AIX, so that the CI produces a clean build.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111359
Even if these comments have a benefit in .h files (for editors that
care about language but can't be configured to treat .h as C++ code),
they certainly have no benefit for files with the .cpp extension.
Discussed in D110794.
Since we officially don't support several older compilers now, we can
drop a lot of the markup in the test suite. This helps keep the test
suite simple and makes sure that UNSUPPORTED annotations don't rot.
This is the first patch of a series that will remove annotations for
compilers that are now unsupported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107787
This allows waiving the right amount of asserts on Windows and zOS.
This should supersede D107124 and D105910.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107755
The XFAIL comments about VCRuntime not providing aligned operator new
are outdated; these days VCRuntime does provide them.
However, the tests used to fail on Windows, as the pointers allocated
with an aligned operator new (which is implemented with _aligned_malloc
on Windows) can't be freed using std::free() on Windows (but they need
to be freed with the corresponding function _aligned_free instead).
Instead override the aligned operator new to return a dummy suitably
aligned pointer instead, like other tests that override aligned operator
new.
Also override `operator delete[]` instead of plain `operator delete`
in the array testcase; the fallback from `operator delete[]` to
user defined `operator delete` doesn't work in all DLL build
configurations on Windows.
Also expand the TEST_NOEXCEPT macros, as these tests only are built
in C++17 mode.
By providing the aligned operator new within the tests, this also makes
these test cases pass when testing back deployment on macOS 10.9.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105962
Now that Lit supports regular expressions inside XFAIL & friends, it is
much easier to write Lit annotations based on the triple.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104747
This fixes a long standing issue where the triple is not always set
consistently in all configurations. This change also moves the
back-deployment Lit features to using the proper target triple
instead of using something ad-hoc.
This will be necessary for using from scratch Lit configuration files
in both normal testing and back-deployment testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102012
After this patch, we can use `--param std=c++20` even if the compiler only
supports -std=c++2a. The test suite will handle that for us. The only Lit
feature that isn't fully baked will always be the "in development" one,
since we don't know exactly what year the standard will be ratified in.
This is another take on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99789.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100210
This matches what we link the library itself against (set in
CMakeLists.txt). When testing a static library version of libc++,
this is needed for essentially every test due to libc++ object files
requiring it.
Also with libc++ built as a DLL, some tests directly call functions that
are provided by msvcprt (such as std::set_new_handler), thus this fixes
a number of tests in that configuration too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99263
This makes no attempt yet to look into the why/what for each of them,
but makes the CI configuration useful for tracking further regressions.
After looking into each case, they can either be fixed, or converted
into UNSUPPORTED: windows or XFAIL: windows, once the cause is known
and explained.
A number of the filesystem cases can be fixed by patches that are
currently in review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99095
- Several -Wshadow warnings
- Several places where we did not initialize our base class explicitly
- Unused variable warnings
- Some tautological comparisons
- Some places where we'd pass null arguments to functions expecting
non-null (in unevaluated contexts)
- Add a few pragmas to turn off spurious warnings
- Fix warnings about declarations that don't declare anything
- Properly disable deprecation warnings in ext/ tests (the pragmas we
were using didn't work on GCC)
- Disable include_as_c.sh.cpp because GCC complains about C++ flags
when compiling as C. I couldn't find a way to fix this one properly,
so I'm disabling the test. This isn't great, but at least we'll be
able to enable warnings in the whole test suite with GCC.
This is needed when running the tests in Freestanding mode, where main()
isn't treated specially. In Freestanding, main() doesn't get mangled as
extern "C", so whatever runtime we're using fails to find the entry point.
One way to solve this problem is to define a symbol alias from __Z4mainiPPc
to _main, however this requires all definitions of main() to have the same
mangling. Hence this commit.
Instead, use with_system_cxx_lib with various compile-only tests to ensure
that we're getting compile-time errors, as expected. This follows the
lead of ec46cfefe8.
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
Tests that require support for Clang-verify are already marked as such
explicitly by their extension, which is .verify.cpp. Requiring the use
of an explicit Lit feature is, after thought, not really helpful.
This is a change in design: we have been bitten in the past by tests not
being enabled when we thought they were. However, the issue was mostly
with file extensions being ignored. The fix for that is not to blindly
require explicit features all the time, but instead to report all files
that are in the suite but that don't match any known test format. This
can be implemented in a follow-up patch.
Instead of being ShTests that use clang-verify (and without the proper
REQUIRES annotation), create .verify.cpp tests instead with the right
REQUIRES annotation.
The libc++ test suite has a lot of old Lit features used to XFAIL tests
and mark them as UNSUPPORTED. Many of them are to workaround problems on
old compilers or old platforms. As time goes by, it is good to go and
clean those up to simplify the configuration of the test suite, and also
to reflect the testing reality. It's not useful to have markup that gives
the impression that e.g. clang-3.3 is supported, when we don't really
test on it anymore (and hence several new tests probably don't have the
necessary markup on them).
The testing script used to test libc++ historically did not like directories
without any testing files, so these tests had been added. Since this is
not necessary anymore, we can now remove these files. This has the benefit
that the total number of tests reflects the real number of tests more
closely, and we also skip some unnecessary work (especially relevant when
running tests over SSH).
However, some nothing_to_do.pass.cpp tests actually serve the purpose of
documenting that an area of the Standard doesn't need to be tested, or is
tested elsewhere. These files are not removed by this commit.
Removal done with:
import os
import itertools
for (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) in itertools.chain(os.walk('./libcxx/test'),
os.walk('./libcxxabi/test')):
if len(filenames + dirnames) > 1 and \
any(p == 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp' for p in filenames):
os.remove(os.path.join(dirpath, 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp'))
Using the ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS annotation, it is possible to move
these tests from .sh.cpp to .pass.cpp, making them suitable for running
on remote hosts more easily.
lit is not very clever when it performs substitution on RUN lines. It
simply looks for a match anywhere in the line (without tokenization)
and replaces it by the expansion. This means that a RUN line containing
e.g. `-verify-ignore-unexpected=note` wouod be expanded to
`-verify-ignore-unexpected=<substitution for not>e`, which is
surprising and nonsensical.
It also means that something like `%compile_module` could be expanded
to `<substitution-for-%compile>_module` or to the correct substitution,
depending on the order in which substitutions are evaluated by lit.
To avoid such problems, it is a good habit to delimit custom substitutions
with some token. This commit does that for all substitutions used in the
libc++ and libc++abi test suites.
Forcing -Werror and other warnings means that the test suite isn't
actually testing what most people are seeing in their code -- it seems
better and less arbitrary to compile these tests as close as possible
to the compiler default instead.
Removing -Werror also means that we get to differentiate between
diagnostics that are errors and those that are warnings, which makes
the test suite more precise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76311
Some tests do not fail at all when -verify is not supported, unless some
arbitrary warning flag is added to make them fail. We currently used
-Werror=unused-result to make them fail, but doing so makes the test
suite a lot more inscrutable. It seems better to just disable those
tests when -verify is not supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76256
It's hard to imagine someone using a recent version of libc++ with a
roughly 3 years old Clang. Since we're not testing libc++ with Clang 3.5
anyway, claiming support for it is somewhat of a lie.
Note that we don't test Clang 4 either, however I have no reason to bump
the requirement beyond Clang 4 at the moment, whereas removing Clang 3.5
allows simplifying the test suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76618
Summary:
Android's libc uses new/delete internally and these are counted, so
the counter needs to be reset to zero at the start of the test.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, #libc, ldionne
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76091
Summary:
LWG2510 makes tag types like allocator_arg_t explicitly default
constructible instead of implicitly default constructible. It also
makes the constructors for std::pair and std::tuple conditionally
explicit based on the explicit-ness of the default constructibility
for the pair/tuple's elements.
This was previously committed as r372777 and reverted in r372832 due to
the commit breaking LLVM's build in C++14 mode. This issue has now been
addressed.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65161
llvm-svn: 372983
We don't support GCC 4 and older according to the documentation, so
we should pretend it doesn't exist.
This is a re-application of r372787.
llvm-svn: 372916
This also reverts:
- r372778: [libc++] Implement LWG 3158
- r372782: [libc++] Try fixing tests that fail on GCC 5 and older
- r372787: Purge mentions of GCC 4 from the test suite
Reason: the change breaks compilation of LLVM with libc++, for details see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/libcxx-dev/2019-September/000599.html
llvm-svn: 372832
Summary:
LWG2510 makes tag types like allocator_arg_t explicitly default
constructible instead of implicitly default constructible. It also
makes the constructors for std::pair and std::tuple conditionally
explicit based on the explicit-ness of the default constructibility
for the pair/tuple's elements.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65161
llvm-svn: 372777
In r361572, we introduced library support for C++20 destroying delete
and decided to only define the library feature-test macro when the
compiler supports the underlying language feature. This patch reworks
the tests to mirror that.
llvm-svn: 366263
Nikolas Klauser