Per our policy, the latest released AppleClang has been 14 for a while,
so libc++ is removing support for AppleClang 13. Our CI bots have been
moved to AppleClang 14 a few weeks ago.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138685
The Standard specifies which types are stored in the basic_format_arg
"variant" and which types are stored as a handle. Libc++ stores
additional types in the "variant". During a reflector discussion
@jwakely mention this is user observable; visit_format_arg uses the type
instead of a handle as argument.
This optimization is useful and will probably be used for other small
types in the future. To be conferment the visitor creates a handle and
uses that as argument. There is a second visitor so the formatter can
still directly access the 128-bit integrals.
The test for the visitor and get has been made public too, there is no
reason not too. The 128-bit integral types are required by the Standard,
when they are available.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138052
Partially implements:
- P1361 Integration of chrono with text formatting
- P2372 Fixing locale handling in chrono formatters
- LWG3270 Parsing and formatting %j with durations
Completes:
- P1650R0 std::chrono::days with 'd' suffix
- LWG3262 Formatting of negative durations is not specified
- LWG3314 Is stream insertion behavior locale dependent when Period::type is micro?
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134742
LWG-3539 was already implemented but not marked as done.
LWG-3567 is implemented in this commit.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112368
This partly reverts D133535 and enables CTAD for more parts in format.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135292
This is mainly to improve the readability of the tests. As a side
effects the tests run faster too,
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135288
This concept is introduced in P2286, but was implemented in libc++
before. This implementation was used in the library internally. This
implementation lacked the resolution of LWG3636. The original formatter
had a non-const member function that wasn't trivial to make a const
member. The recent parser improvements made this member a const member
in preparation of LWG3636.
Note LWG3636 isn't voted in. Its status is Ready. P2286's concept has
been written as-if LWG3636 is accepted and refers to that LWG issue.
Updates some tests make format a const member function and removes a
tests that's mainly a duplicate of the formattable concept test.
Implements
- LWG3636 formatter<T>::format should be const-qualified
Implements parts of
- P2286R8 Formatting Ranges
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134110
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d8 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
Replaces std::__format_context_create with the public wrapper
test_format_context_create.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133781
Formatting the alternate form for the general categories should keep the
trailing zeros. This was reported by @fsb4000 in D131336.
The default format uses general formatting but this should not keep the
trailing zeros so the default format is not passed to the formatter.
While testing I found an off by one error; finding the exponent character
`e` in 1e+03 will start at after the `1` so a size of `4` can contain an
exponent.
Reviewed By: fsb4000, ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131417
Implements:
- LWG3721 Allow an arg-id with a value of zero for width in std-format-spec
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130649
This paper was accepted during the last plenary and is intended to be
backported to LLVM 15. When backporting the release notes in the branch
should be updated too.
Note the feature-test macro isn't updated since this will change; three
papers have updated the same macro in the same plenary.
Implements:
- P2508R1 Exposing std::basic-format-string
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130643
I went over the output of the following mess of a command:
`(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z | parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case | grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)`
and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Spies: philnik, libcxx-commits, mgorny, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130905
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
This implements the Grapheme clustering as required by
P1868R2 width: clarifying units of width and precision in std::format
This was omitted in the initial patch, but the paper was marked as completed. This really completes the paper.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126971
This implements a not accepted LWG issue. Not doing so would require
integral types to use the handle class instead of being directly stored
in the basic_format_arg.
The previous code used `std::forward` in places where it wasn't required
by the Standard. These are now removed.
Implements:
- P2418R2 Add support for std::generator-like types to std::format
- LWG 3631 basic_format_arg(T&&) should use remove_cvref_t<T> throughout
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127570
With to_chars supporting 128-bit it's possible to support the full
128-bit range in format. This only removes the previous restrictions
and updates the tests to validate proper support.
Depends on D128929.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129007
A formatter using a handle only needs to satisfy the BasicFormatter
requirements. The current test allowed more than that minimum. Changed
it to the minimum to make sure it works.
This was due to a post-commit review comment of @vitaut in D121530.
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127767
The compilers clang-11, clang-12, and apple-clang-12 are no longer
supported, so remove their annotations in the tests.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127588
The debug mode has been broken pretty much ever since it was shipped
because it was possible to enable the debug mode in user code without
actually enabling it in the dylib, leading to ODR violations that
caused various kinds of failures.
This commit makes the debug mode a knob that is configured when
building the library and which can't be changed afterwards. This is
less flexible for users, however it will actually work as intended
and it will allow us, in the future, to add various kinds of checks
that do not assume the same ABI as the normal library. Furthermore,
this will make the debug mode more robust, which means that vendors
might be more tempted to support it properly, which hasn't been the
case with the current debug mode.
This patch shouldn't break any user code, except folks who are building
against a library that doesn't have the debug mode enabled and who try
to enable the debug mode in their code. Such users will get a compile-time
error explaining that this configuration isn't supported anymore.
In the future, we should further increase the granularity of the debug
mode checks so that we can cherry-pick which checks to enable, like we
do for unspecified behavior randomization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122941
Formatting a string-literal had an off-by-one issue where the NUL
terminator became part of the formatted output.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126665
Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482
This optimizes the __format_arg_store type to allow a more efficient
storage of the basic_format_args.
It stores the data in two arrays:
- A struct with the tag of the exposition only variant's type and the
offset of the element in the data array. Since this array only depends
on the type information it's calculated at compile time and can be
shared by different instances of this class.
- The arguments converted to the types used in the exposition only
variant of basic_format_arg. This means the packed data can be
directly copied to an element of this variant.
The new code uses rvalue reference arguments in preparation for P2418.
The handle class also has some changes to prepare for P2418. The real
changed for P2418 will be done separately, but these parts make it
easier to implement that paper.
Some parts of existing test code are removed since they were no longer
valid after the changes, but new tests have been added.
Implements parts of:
- P2418 Add support for std::generator-like types to std::format
Completes:
- LWG3473 Normative encouragement in non-normative note
Depends on D121138
Reviewed By: #libc, vitaut, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121514
This formatter isn't in the list of required formatters in
[format.formatter.spec]/2.2
For each charT, the string type specializations
template<> struct formatter<charT*, charT>;
template<> struct formatter<const charT*, charT>;
template<size_t N> struct formatter<const charT[N], charT>;
template<class traits, class Allocator>
struct formatter<basic_string<charT, traits, Allocator>, charT>;
template<class traits>
struct formatter<basic_string_view<charT, traits>, charT>;
Since remove_cvref_t<const charT[N]> is charT[N] the formatter is
required by
[format.functions]/25
Preconditions: formatter<remove_cvref_t<Ti>, charT> meets the
BasicFormatter requirements ([formatter.requirements]) for each Ti in
Args.
Depends on D120921
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121138
The GCC failures were partly fixed in D124103.
The format functions tests are fixed on GCC but they require a huge
amount of RAM (>10 GB). This fails with parallel testing in the CI. It
can be solved by splitting the test, but GCC-12 will be released shortly
and might fix the memory usage in these tests. Therefore these tests
remain disabled.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124335
Before implementing P2216's format-string adjust the unit tests.
After P2216 the format* functions require a compile-time string literal.
This changes prepares the tests.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122534
Instead of using a temporary `string` in `__vformat_to_wrapped` use a new
generic iterator. This aids to reduce the number of template instantions
and avoids using a `string` to buffer the entire formatted output.
This changes the type of `format_context` and `wformat_context`, this can
still be done since the code isn't ABI stable yet.
Several approaches have been evaluated:
- Using a __output_buffer base class with:
- a put function to store the buffer in its internal buffer
- a virtual flush function to copy the internal buffer to the output
- Using a `function` to forward the output operation to the output buffer,
much like the next method.
- Using a type erased function point to store the data in the buffer.
The last version resulted in the best performance. For some cases there's
still a loss of speed over the original method. This loss many becomes
apparent when large strings are copied to a pointer like iterator, before
the compiler optimized this using `memcpy`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110495
Before it only accepted one output iterator type. Now it accepts all
output iterator types as required by BasicFormatter.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120916
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
Louis Dionne