C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
The tests had copy-paste errors which started showing when an
unused-variable warning started being emitted after we made
the MoveOnly type constexpr (in a4b8ee6422).
By renaming .fail.cpp tests that don't need clang-verify to .compile.fail.cpp,
the new test format will not try to compile these tests with clang-verify,
and the old test format will work just the same. However, this allows
removing a workaround that requires parsing each test looking for
clang-verify markup.
After this change, a .fail.cpp test should always have clang-verify markup.
When clang-verify is not supported by the compiler, we will just check that
these tests fail to compile. When clang-verify is supported, these tests
will be compiled with clang-verify whether they have markup or not (so
they should have markup, or they will fail).
This simplifies the test suite and also ensures that all of our .fail.cpp
tests provide clang-verify markup. If it's impossible for a test to have
clang-verify markup, it can be moved to a .compile.fail.cpp test, which
are unconditionally just checked for compilation failure.
Summary:
LWG 3158 marks the allocator_arg_t constructor of std::tuple as
conditionnally explicit based on whether the default constructors
of the tuple's members are explicitly default constructible.
This was previously committed as r372778 and reverted in r372832 due to
the commit breaking LLVM's build in C++14 mode. This issue has now been
addressed.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65232
llvm-svn: 373092
Summary:
LWG2510 makes tag types like allocator_arg_t explicitly default
constructible instead of implicitly default constructible. It also
makes the constructors for std::pair and std::tuple conditionally
explicit based on the explicit-ness of the default constructibility
for the pair/tuple's elements.
This was previously committed as r372777 and reverted in r372832 due to
the commit breaking LLVM's build in C++14 mode. This issue has now been
addressed.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65161
llvm-svn: 372983
We don't support GCC 4 and older according to the documentation, so
we should pretend it doesn't exist.
This is a re-application of r372787.
llvm-svn: 372916
This also reverts:
- r372778: [libc++] Implement LWG 3158
- r372782: [libc++] Try fixing tests that fail on GCC 5 and older
- r372787: Purge mentions of GCC 4 from the test suite
Reason: the change breaks compilation of LLVM with libc++, for details see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/libcxx-dev/2019-September/000599.html
llvm-svn: 372832
Summary:
LWG 3158 marks the allocator_arg_t constructor of std::tuple as
conditionnally explicit based on whether the default constructors
of the tuple's members are explicitly default constructible.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65232
llvm-svn: 372778
Summary:
LWG2510 makes tag types like allocator_arg_t explicitly default
constructible instead of implicitly default constructible. It also
makes the constructors for std::pair and std::tuple conditionally
explicit based on the explicit-ness of the default constructibility
for the pair/tuple's elements.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65161
llvm-svn: 372777
Like CTAD for std::unordered_set, AppleClang 9's support for CTAD is
insufficient. I suspect the corresponding LLVM Clang is broken too,
but we don't seem to have testers using that Clang.
llvm-svn: 368911
Summary:
We were using implicit deduction guides instead of explicit ones,
however the implicit ones don't do work anymore when changing the
constructors.
This commit adds the actual guides specified in the Standard to make
libc++ (1) closer to the Standard and (2) more resistent to changes
in std::tuple's constructors.
Reviewers: Quuxplusone
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65225
llvm-svn: 368599
Previously we implemented all one trillion tuple-like constructors using
a single generic overload. This worked fairly well, except that it
differed in behavior from the standard version because it didn't
consider both T&& and T const&. This was observable for certain
types.
This patch addresses that issue by splitting the generic constructor
in two. We now provide both T&& and T const& versions of the
tuple-like constructors (sort of).
llvm-svn: 365973
types.
It seems some people like to write types that can explicitly convert
to anything, but cannot be used to explicitly construct anything.
This patch makes tuple tolerate such types, as is required
by the standard.
llvm-svn: 365074
When the arguments to tuple cat were const, the const was incorrectly
propagated into the type of the resulting tuple. For example:
const std::tuple<int> t(42);
auto r = std::tuple_cat(t, t);
// Incorrect! should be std::tuple<int, int>.
static_assert(is_same_v<decltype(r), std::tuple<const int, const int>>);
llvm-svn: 359255
When the whole test only works starting at some version of the Standard,
use UNSUPPORTED lit markup instead of #ifdef TEST_STD_VER. This provides
more visibility into the test suite.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D57704.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 353206
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
There were 3 tests with 'int main(void)', and 6 with the return type on a different line. I'm about to send a patch for main in tests, and this NFC change is unrelated.
llvm-svn: 350770
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/exclusive.scan/exclusive_scan.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/exclusive.scan/exclusive_scan_init_op.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan_op.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/inclusive.scan/inclusive_scan_op_init.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.exclusive.scan/transform_exclusive_scan_init_bop_uop.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.inclusive.scan/transform_inclusive_scan_bop_uop.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/numeric.ops/transform.inclusive.scan/transform_inclusive_scan_bop_uop_init.pass.cpp
Fix MSVC x64 truncation warnings.
warning C4267: conversion from 'size_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.modifiers/string_append/push_back.pass.cpp
Fix MSVC uninitialized memory warning.
warning C6001: Using uninitialized memory 'vl'.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/PR20855_tuple_ref_binding_diagnostics.pass.cpp
Include <cassert> for the assert() macro.
Fixes D43273.
llvm-svn: 326120
Summary:
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20855
Libc++ goes out of it's way to diagnose `std::tuple` constructions which are UB due to lifetime bugs caused by reference creation. For example:
```
// The 'const std::string&' is created *inside* the tuple constructor, and its lifetime is over before the end of the constructor call.
std::tuple<int, const std::string&> t(std::make_tuple(42, "abc"));
```
However, we are over-aggressive and we incorrectly diagnose cases such as:
```
void foo(std::tuple<int const&, int const&> const&);
foo(std::make_tuple(42, 42));
```
This patch fixes the incorrectly diagnosed cases, as well as converting the diagnostic to use the newly added Clang trait `__reference_binds_to_temporary`. The new trait allows us to diagnose cases we previously couldn't such as:
```
std::tuple<int, const std::string&> t(42, "abc");
```
Reviewers: rsmith, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41977
llvm-svn: 323380
Clang and C1XX both complain about mismatched class/struct, but libc++ and MSVC's STL
differ on what they use for tuple_element/tuple_size, so there's no way to win here.
I'm reverting this part of my previous change. In the future, I'll have to suppress
the warning for one compiler or the other.
llvm-svn: 305854
Style/paranoia: 42.1 doesn't have an exact binary representation. Although this doesn't
cause failures, it makes me uncomfortable, so I'm changing it to 42.5.
C1XX rightly warns about unreferenced variables. Adding tests for their values
makes C1XX happy and improves test coverage.
C1XX (somewhat obnoxiously) warns about seeing a struct specialized as a class.
Although the Standard doesn't care, saying struct consistently is better.
(The Standard itself is still inconsistent about whether to depict tuple_element
and tuple_size as structs or classes.)
Fixes D33953.
llvm-svn: 305843
In addition to the PR for LWG 2773 this patch also ensures
that each of std::ignores constructors or assignment operators
are constexpr.
llvm-svn: 294165
The test was previously set to XFAIL if __cpp_structured_bindings
wasn't defined. However there are Clang 4.0 versions which do not
define this macro but do provide structured bindings, which causes
the test to pass unexpectedly.
This patch changes the XFAIL to an UNSUPPORTED.
llvm-svn: 291060
Summary:
This patch attempts to re-implement a fix for LWG 2770, but not the actual specified PR.
The PR for 2770 specifies tuple_size<T const> as only conditionally providing a `::value` member. However C++17 structured bindings require `tuple_size<T const>` to be complete only if `tuple_size<T>` is also complete. Therefore this patch implements only provides the specialization `tuple_size<T CV>` iff `tuple_size<T>` is a complete type.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR31513.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, mpark
Subscribers: mpark, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28222
llvm-svn: 291019
This patch implements the correct PR for LWG 2770. It also makes the primary
tuple_size template incomplete again which fixes part of llvm.org/PR31513.
llvm-svn: 290846
This patch reverts the changes to tuple which fixed construction from
types derived from tuple. It breaks the code mentioned in llvm.org/PR31384.
I'll follow this commit up with a test case.
llvm-svn: 289773
Summary:
The standard requires tuple have the following constructors:
```
tuple(tuple<OtherTypes...> const&);
tuple(tuple<OtherTypes...> &&);
tuple(pair<T1, T2> const&);
tuple(pair<T1, T2> &&);
tuple(array<T, N> const&);
tuple(array<T, N> &&);
```
However libc++ implements these as a single constructor with the signature:
```
template <class TupleLike, enable_if_t<__is_tuple_like<TupleLike>::value>>
tuple(TupleLike&&);
```
This causes the constructor to reject types derived from tuple-like types; Unlike if we had all of the concrete overloads, because they cause the derived->base conversion in the signature.
This patch fixes this issue by detecting derived types and the tuple-like base they are derived from. It does this by creating an overloaded function with signatures for each of tuple/pair/array and checking if the possibly derived type can convert to any of them.
This patch fixes [PR17550]( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17550)
This patch
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, mpark, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27606
llvm-svn: 289727
test/support/test_macros.h
For convenience/greppability, add macros for libcxx-specific static_asserts about noexceptness.
(Moving the definitions of ASSERT_NOEXCEPT/ASSERT_NOT_NOEXCEPT isn't technically necessary
because they're macros, but I think it's better style to define stuff before using it.)
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.apply/apply.pass.cpp
There was a completely unused `TrackedCallable obj;`.
apply() isn't depicted with conditional noexcept in C++17.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.apply/make_from_tuple.pass.cpp
Now that we have LIBCPP_ASSERT_NOEXCEPT, use it.
Fixes D27622.
llvm-svn: 289264
This patch removes libc++'s tuple extension which allowed it to be
constructed from fewer initializers than elements; with the remaining
elements being default constructed. However the implicit version of
this extension breaks conforming code. For example:
int fun(std::string);
int fun(std::tuple<std::string, int>);
int x = fun("hello"); // ambigious
Because existing code may already depend on this extension it can be re-enabled
by defining _LIBCPP_ENABLE_TUPLE_IMPLICIT_REDUCED_ARITY_EXTENSION.
Note that the explicit version of this extension is still supported,
although it's somewhat less useful than the implicit one.
llvm-svn: 289158
Instead of storing double in double and then truncating to int, store int in long
and then widen to long long. This preserves test coverage (as these tests are
interested in various tuple conversions) while avoiding truncation warnings.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/const_pair.pass.cpp
Since we aren't physically truncating anymore, t1 is equal to p0.
test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/convert_copy.pass.cpp
One edit is different from the usual pattern. Previously, we were storing
double in double and then converting to A, which has an implicitly converting
constructor from int. Now, we're storing int in int and then converting to A,
avoiding the truncation.
Fixes D27542.
llvm-svn: 289109
Change char to long and remove some char casts. This preserves test coverage for tuple's
heterogeneous comparisons, while avoiding int-to-char truncation warnings.
Fixes D27541.
llvm-svn: 289108
This replaces every occurrence of _LIBCPP_STD_VER in the tests with
TEST_STD_VER. Additionally, for every affected
file, #include "test_macros.h" is being added explicitly if it wasn't
already there.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26294
llvm-svn: 286007
This is a breaking change. The SFINAE required is instantiated the second
the class is instantiated, and this can cause hard SFINAE errors
when applied to references to incomplete types. Ex.
struct IncompleteType;
extern IncompleteType it;
std::tuple<IncompleteType&> t(it); // SFINAE will blow up.
llvm-svn: 276598
This patch upgrades <tuple> to be C++17 compliant by implementing:
* tuple_size_v: This was forgotten when implementing the other _v traits.
* std::apply: This was added via LFTS v1 in p0220r1.
* std::make_from_tuple: This was added in p0209r2.
llvm-svn: 275745
This patch attempts to improve the QoI of std::tuples tuple_element and
__make_tuple_types helpers. Previously they required O(N) instantiations,
one for every element in the tuple
The new implementations are O(1) after __tuple_indices<Id...> is created.
llvm-svn: 274330
Libc++ has to deduce the 'allocator_arg_t' parameter as 'AllocArgT' for the
following constructor:
template <class Alloc> tuple(allocator_arg_t, Alloc const&)
Previously libc++ has tried to support tags derived from 'allocator_arg_t' by
using 'is_base_of<AllocArgT, allocator_arg_t>'. However this breaks whenever a
2-tuple contains a reference to an incomplete type as its first parameter.
See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27684
llvm-svn: 273334
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
// Do test.
#else
// Empty test.
#endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.
Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730
llvm-svn: 271108
There are two main fixes in this patch.
First the constructor SFINAE was changed so that it's evaluated in two stages
where the first stage evaluates the "safe" SFINAE conditions and the second
evaluates the "dangerous" ones. The key is that the second stage is lazily
evaluated only if the first stage passes. This helps fix PR23256
(https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23256).
The second fix is for PR22806 and LWG issue 2549. This fix applies
the suggested resolution to the LWG issue in order to prevent the construction
of dangling references. The SFINAE for this check is contained within
the _PreferTupleLikeConstructor alias template. The tuple-like constructors
are disabled whenever that trait returns false.
(https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22806)
(http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2549)
llvm-svn: 266461
Summary:
A default uses-allocator constructor has been added since that overload was previously provided by the extended constructor.
Since Clang does implicit conversion checking after substitution this constructor has to deduce the allocator_arg_t parameter so that it can prevent the evaluation of "is_default_constructible" if the first argument doesn't match. See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1391 for more information.
This patch fixes PR24779 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24779)
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19006
llvm-svn: 266409
Summary:
Currently parts of the SFINAE on tuples default constructor always gets evaluated even when the default constructor is never called or instantiated. This can cause a hard compile error when a tuple is created with types that do not have a default constructor. Below is a self contained example using a pair like class. This code will not compile but probably should.
```
#include <type_traits>
template <class T>
struct IllFormedDefaultImp {
IllFormedDefaultImp(T x) : value(x) {}
constexpr IllFormedDefaultImp() {}
T value;
};
typedef IllFormedDefaultImp<int &> IllFormedDefault;
template <class T, class U>
struct pair
{
template <bool Dummy = true,
class = typename std::enable_if<
std::is_default_constructible<T>::value
&& std::is_default_constructible<U>::value
&& Dummy>::type
>
constexpr pair() : first(), second() {}
pair(T const & t, U const & u) : first(t), second(u) {}
T first;
U second;
};
int main()
{
int x = 1;
IllFormedDefault v(x);
pair<IllFormedDefault, IllFormedDefault> p(v, v);
}
```
One way to fix this is to use `Dummy` in a more involved way in the constructor SFINAE. The following patch fixes these sorts of hard compile errors for tuple.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, K-ballo, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: ldionne, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7569
llvm-svn: 230120
Summary: No declaration for the type `tuple` is given in c++03 or c++98 modes. Mark all tests that use the actual `tuple` type as UNSUPPORTED.
Reviewers: jroelofs, mclow.lists, danalbert
Reviewed By: danalbert
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5956
llvm-svn: 229808
Louis Dionne