We currently call a lot of functions with the same list of types. To avoid forgetting any of them, this patch adds type_lists and utilities for it. Specifically, it adds
- `type_list` - This is just a list of types
- `concatenate` - This allows concatenating type_lists
- `for_each` - Iterate over a type_list
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: jloser, EricWF, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137476
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d8 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
When we ship LLVM 16, <ranges> won't be considered experimental anymore.
We might as well do this sooner rather than later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132151
It is meant to be used in ranges algorithm tests.
It is much simplified version of C++23's tuple + zip_view.
Using std::swap would cause compilation failure and using `std::move` would not create the correct rvalue proxy which would result in copies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129099
This way we ensure that we don't use-after-move the iterators.
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129044
Note that this class was called just `split_view` in the original One
Ranges Proposal and was renamed to `lazy_split_view` by
[P2210](https://wg21.link/p2210).
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107500
This iterator is used to test code that only needs to satisfy the
output_iterator concept. Follow-up changes will use this iterator in
older language Standards.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122072
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
operator-> is not a requirement for most iterators, so remove it. To
account for this change, the `common_iterator.operator->` test needs to
be refactored quite a bit -- improve test coverage while we're at it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118400
Change the tests to use the base friend function instead of members.
Also changed some types to have a base friends instead of members.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120742
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736
The renames the output_iterator to cpp17_output_iterator. These
iterators are still used in C++20 so it's not possible to change the
current type to the new C++20 requirements. This is done in a similar
fashion as the cpp17_input_iterator.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117950
Instead of storing the wrapped iterator inside the stride_counting_iterator,
store its base so we can have e.g. a stride_counting_iterator of an
input_iterator (which was previously impossible because input_iterators
are not copyable). Also a few other simplifications in stride_counting_iterator.
As a fly-by fix, remove the member base() functions, which are super
confusing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116613
AFAICT, Cpp17InputIterators are not required to be default constructible,
since that requirement is added in Cpp17ForwardIterator. Hence, our
archetype for Cpp17InputIterator should not be default constructible.
Removing that constructor has a ripple effect on a couple of tests that
were making incorrect assumptions. Notably:
- Some tests were using cpp17_input_iterator as a sentinel for itself.
That is not valid, because a cpp17_input_iterator is not semiregular
anymore after the change (and hence it doesn't satisfy sentinel_for).
- Some tests were using a stride-counted cpp17_input_iterator as the
sentinel for a range. This doesn't work anymore because of the problem
above, so these tests were changed not to check stride counts for
input iterators.
- Some tests were default constructing cpp17_input_iterator when a simple
alternative was available -- those have been changed to use that alternative.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115806
Remove `s.base()`; every test that wants to get the base of a "test sentinel"
should use the ADL `base(s)` from now on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115766
This follows up on my addition of base(cpp20_input_iterator) in D115177,
making all the ADL base() functions consistent.
Also align cpp20_input_iterator with the other test iterators' style.
Reviewed as part of D115272.
Before this patch, the new test's `CountedInvocable<int*, int*>`
would hard-error instead of SFINAEing and cleanly returning false.
Notice that views::counted specifically does NOT work with pipes;
`counted(42)` is ill-formed. This is because `counted`'s first argument
is supposed to be an iterator, not a range.
Also, mark `views::counted(it, n)` as [[nodiscard]], and test that.
(We have a general policy now that range adaptors are consistently
marked [[nodiscard]], so that people don't accidentally think that
they have side effects. This matters mostly for `reverse` and
`transform`, arguably `drop`, and just generally let's be consistent.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115177
Implement P1391 (https://wg21.link/p1391) which allows
`std::string_view` to be constructible from any contiguous range of
characters.
Note that a different paper (http://wg21.link/P1989) handles the generic
range constructor for `std::string_view`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110718
Some tests repeat the definition of `DELETE_FUNCTION` macro locally.
However, it's not even requred to guard against in the C++03 case since
Clang supports `= delete;` in C++03 mode. A warning is issued but
`libc++` tests run with `-Wno-c++11-extensions`, so this isn't an issue.
Since we don't support other compilers in C++03 mode, `= delete;` is
always available for use. As such, inline all calls of `DELETE_FUNCTION`
to use `= delete;`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111148
The majority of the changes here are whitespace.
Also simplify `ThrowingIterator`'s bookkeeping (NFC).
Also move some free operators into hidden friends, for sanity's sake.
Also `=delete` some more comma operators.
Also use `constexpr` in C++20 instead of `TEST_CONSTEXPR_CXX14`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103341
This started as an attempt to fix a GCC 11 warning of misplaced parentheses.
I then noticed that trying to fix the parentheses warning actually triggered
errors in the tests, showing that we were incorrectly assuming that the
implementation of ranges::advance was using operator+= or operator-=.
This commit fixes that issue and makes the tests easier to follow by
localizing the assertions it makes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103272
C++20 revised the definition of what it means to be an iterator. While
all _Cpp17InputIterators_ satisfy `std::input_iterator`, the reverse
isn't true. D100271 introduces a new test adaptor to accommodate this
new definition (`cpp20_input_iterator`).
In order to help readers immediately distinguish which input iterator
adaptor is _Cpp17InputIterator_, the current `input_iterator` adaptor
has been prefixed with `cpp17_`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101242
- Quality-of-implementation: Avoid calling __unwrap_iter in constexpr contexts.
The user might conceivably write a contiguous iterator where normal iterator
arithmetic is constexpr-friendly but `std::to_address(it)` isn't.
- Bugfix: When you pass contiguous iterators to `std::copy`, you should get
back your contiguous iterator type, not a raw pointer. That means that
libc++ can't `__unwrap_iter` unless it also does `__rewrap_iter`.
Fortunately, this is implementable.
- Improve test coverage of the new `contiguous_iterator` test iterator.
This catches the bug described above.
- Tests: Stop testing that we can `std::copy` //into// an `input_iterator`.
Our test iterators may currently support that, but it seems nonsensical to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95983
- Implement C++20's changes to `reverse_iterator`, so that it won't be
accidentally counted as a contiguous iterator in C++20 mode.
- Implement C++20's changes to `move_iterator` as well.
- `move_iterator` should not be contiguous. This fixes a bug where
we optimized `std::copy`-of-move-iterators in an observable way.
Add a regression test for that bugfix.
- Add libcxx tests for `__is_cpp17_contiguous_iterator` of all relevant
standard iterator types. Particularly check that vector::iterator
is still considered contiguous in all C++ modes, even C++03.
After this patch, there continues to be no supported way to write your
own iterator type in C++17-and-earlier such that libc++ will consider it
"contiguous"; however, we now fully support the C++20 approach (in C++20
mode only). If you want user-defined contiguous iterators in C++17-and-earlier,
libc++'s position is "please upgrade to C++20."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94807
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Nikolas Klauser