LLVM contains a helpful function for getting the size of a C-style
array: `llvm::array_lengthof`. This is useful prior to C++17, but not as
helpful for C++17 or later: `std::size` already has support for C-style
arrays.
Change call sites to use `std::size` instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133429
We already remove dots from collected paths and path mappings. This
makes it difficult to match paths inside the profile which contain
dots. For example, we would never match /path/to/../file.c because
the collected path is always be normalized to /path/file.c. This
change enables dot removal for paths inside the profile to address
the issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123164
We already remove dots from collected paths and path mappings. This
makes it difficult to match paths inside the profile which contain
dots. For example, we would never match /path/to/../file.c because
the collected path is always be normalized to /path/file.c. This
change enables dot removal for paths inside the profile to address
the issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122750
This reverts commit ef82063207.
- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLExtras, which will now
never be called.
- Calling it without llvm:: breaks C++17 compat
LineCoverageIterator is not providing access to a mutable object. Fix it
to iterate over `const LineCoverageStats` so that `operator->()`
compiles again after 6b9b86db9d.
For source-based coverage, the frontend sets the counter IDs and the
constraints of counter IDs is not defined. For e.g., the Rust frontend
until recently had a reserved counter #0
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83774). Rust coverage
instrumentation also creates counters on edges in addition to basic
blocks. Some functions may have more counters than regions.
This breaks an assumption in CoverageMapping.cpp where the number of
counters in a function is assumed to be bounded by the number of
regions:
Counts.assign(Record.MappingRegions.size(), 0);
This assumption causes CounterMappingContext::evaluate() to fail since
there are not enough counter values created in the above call to
`Counts.assign`. Consequently, some uncovered functions are not
reported in coverage reports.
This change walks a Function's CoverageMappingRecord to find the maximum
counter ID, and uses it to initialize the counter array when instrprof
records are missing for a function in sparse profiles.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101780
When making compilation relocatable, for example in distributed
compilation scenarios, we want to set compilation dir to a relative
value like `.` but this presents a problem when generating reports
because if the file path is relative as well, for example `..`, you
may end up writing files outside of the output directory.
This change introduces a flag that allows overriding the compilation
directory that's stored inside the profile with a different value that
is absolute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100232
We will pass StringRef and change it in reader.
But we reuse the same Filename vector without clear it,
so in some systems, we may clobbeer previous results.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97353
We currently always store absolute filenames in coverage mapping. This
is problematic for several reasons. It poses a problem for distributed
compilation as source location might vary across machines. We are also
duplicating the path prefix potentially wasting space.
This change modifies how we store filenames in coverage mapping. Rather
than absolute paths, it stores the compilation directory and file paths
as given to the compiler, either relative or absolute. Later when
reading the coverage mapping information, we recombine relative paths
with the working directory. This approach is similar to handling
ofDW_AT_comp_dir in DWARF.
Finally, we also provide a new option, -fprofile-compilation-dir akin
to -fdebug-compilation-dir which can be used to manually override the
compilation directory which is useful in distributed compilation cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95753
We currently always store absolute filenames in coverage mapping. This
is problematic for several reasons. It poses a problem for distributed
compilation as source location might vary across machines. We are also
duplicating the path prefix potentially wasting space.
This change modifies how we store filenames in coverage mapping. Rather
than absolute paths, it stores the compilation directory and file paths
as given to the compiler, either relative or absolute. Later when
reading the coverage mapping information, we recombine relative paths
with the working directory. This approach is similar to handling
ofDW_AT_comp_dir in DWARF.
Finally, we also provide a new option, -fprofile-compilation-dir akin
to -fdebug-compilation-dir which can be used to manually override the
compilation directory which is useful in distributed compilation cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95753
Try again with an up-to-date version of D69471 (99317124 was a stale
revision).
---
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Don't skip functions with the same name but from different files.
That change makes it possible to generate code coverage reports from
different binaries compiled from different sources even if there are functions
with non-unique names. Without that change, code coverage for such functions is
missing except of the first function processed.
Reviewers: vsk, morehouse
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46478
llvm-svn: 331801
This extends r319391. It teaches the segment builder to emit the right
completed segment when more than one region ends at the same location.
Fixes PR35495.
llvm-svn: 319990
This is a fix for the coverage segment builder.
If multiple regions must be popped off the active stack at once, and
more than one of them end at the same location, emit a segment using the
count from the most-recent completed region.
Fixes PR35437, rdar://35760630
Testing: invoked llvm-cov on a stage2 build of clang, additional unit
tests, check-profile
llvm-svn: 319391
We've worked around bugs in the frontend by ignoring the count from
wrapped segments when a line has at least one region entry segment.
Those frontend bugs are now fixed, so it's time to regenerate the
checked-in covmapping files and remove the workaround.
llvm-svn: 317761
LineCoverageIterator makes it easy for clients of coverage data to
determine line execution counts for a file or function. The coverage
iteration logic is tricky enough that it really pays not to have
multiple copies of it. Hopefully having just one implementation in LLVM
will make the iteration logic easier to test, reuse, and update.
This commit is NFC but I've added a unit test to go along with it just
because it's easy to do now.
llvm-svn: 316141
A coverage segment contains a starting line and column, an execution
count, and some other metadata. Clients of the coverage library use
segments to prepare line-oriented reports.
Users of the coverage library depend on segments being unique and sorted
in source order. Currently this is not guaranteed (this is why the clang
change which introduced deferred regions was reverted).
This commit documents the "unique and sorted" condition and asserts that
it holds. It also fixes the SegmentBuilder so that it produces correct
output in some edge cases.
Testing: I've added unit tests for some edge cases. I've also checked
that the new SegmentBuilder implementation is fully covered. Apart from
running check-profile and the llvm-cov tests, I've successfully used a
stage1 llvm-cov to prepare a coverage report for an instrumented clang
binary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36813
llvm-svn: 312817
The CoverageMapping::getInstantiations() API retrieved all function
records corresponding to functions with more than one instantiation (e.g
template functions with multiple specializations). However, there was no
simple way to determine *which* function a given record was an
instantiation of. This was an oversight, since it's useful to aggregate
coverage information over all instantiations of a function.
llvm-cov works around this by building a mapping of source locations to
instantiation sets, but this duplicates logic that libCoverage already
has (see FunctionInstantiationSetCollector).
This change adds a new API, CoverageMapping::getInstantiationGroups(),
which returns a list of InstantiationGroups. A group contains records
for each instantiation of some particular function, and also provides
utilities to get the total execution count within the group, the source
location of the common definition, etc.
This lets removes some hacky logic in llvm-cov by reusing
FunctionInstantiationSetCollector and makes the CoverageMapping API
friendlier for other clients.
llvm-svn: 309904
Reduces llvm-profdata memory usage on a large profile from 7.8GB to 5.1GB.
The ProfData API now supports reporting all the errors/warnings rather
than only the first, though llvm-profdata ignores everything after the
first for now to preserve existing behavior. (if there's a desire for
other behavior, happy to implement that - but might be as well left for
a separate patch)
Reviewers: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35149
llvm-svn: 307516
The 'NoError' function was meant to be used as the input to
ASSERT/EXPECT_TRUE, but it is easy to forget this (it could be annotated
with nodiscard to help this) so many sites that look like they're checked
are not (& silently discard the failure). Only one site actually has an
Error sneaking out this way and I've replaced that one with a
FIXME+consumeError.
The rest of the code has been modified to use the EXPECT_THAT_ERROR
macros Zach introduced a while back. Between the options available this
seems OK/good/something to standardize on - though it's difficult to
build a matcher that could handle checking for a specific llvm::Error
result, so those remain using the custom ErrorEquals (& the nodiscard
added to ensure it is not misused as it was previous to this patch). It
could still be generalized a bit further (even not as far as a matcher,
but at least support multiple kinds of Error, etc) & added to the
general Error utility header.
llvm-svn: 307440
These overloads are essentially dead, and pose a maintenance cost
without adding any benefit. This is coming up now because I'd like to
experiment with changing the way we store coverage mapping data, and
would rather not have to fix up the old overloads while doing so.
Testing: check-{llvm,profile}, build clang.
llvm-svn: 306776
With PR33517, it became apparent that symbol table creation can fail
when presented with malformed inputs. This patch makes that sort of
error detectable, so llvm-cov etc. can fail more gracefully.
Specifically, we now check that function records loaded from corrupted coverage
mapping data are rejected, e.g when the recorded function name is garbage.
Testing: check-{llvm,clang,profile}, some unit test updates.
llvm-svn: 305767
Add support for loading multiple coverage readers into a single
CoverageMapping instance. This should make it easier to prepare a
unified coverage report for multiple binaries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25535
llvm-svn: 284251
Joe Loser