This replaces `include $(LEVEL)/Makefile.rules` with `include Makefile.rules`.
The lldb test driver already passes the include path when running make, and specifically looking for "../../Makefile.rules" forces the test to be in a specific location.
Removing this hardcoded relative path will make it possible to move this test as-is.
options class. This value was hanging around so for instance if you made a scripted breakpoint
resolver, then went to set another breakpoint, it would still think you had passed in a class
name and the breakpoint wouldn't do what you expected.
Summary:
Using a BreakpointList corrupts the breakpoints' IDs because
BreakpointList::Add sets the ID, so use a vector instead, and
update the signature to return the vector wrapped in an
llvm::Expected which can propagate any error from the inner
call to StringIsBreakpointName.
Note that, despite the similar name, SBTarget::FindBreakpointsByName
doesn't suffer the same problem, because it uses a SBBreakpointList,
which is more like a BreakpointIDList than a BreakpointList under the
covers.
Add a check to TestBreakpointNames that, without this fix, notices the
ID getting mutated and fails.
Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70907
I assumed this was just a single typo, but it seems we actually have
a whole bunch of tabs in this file which cause Python to complain
about mixing tabs and spaces.
Mixing tabs and spaces makes Python exit with this error:
File "llvm/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/return-value/TestReturnValue.py", line 23
return (self.getArchitecture() == "aarch64" and self.getPlatform() == "linux")
^
TabError: inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation
Summary:
Previously the ABI plugin exposed some "register infos" and the
gdb-remote code used those to fill in the missing bits. Now, the
"filling in" code is in the ABI plugin itself, and the gdb-remote code
just invokes that.
The motivation for this is two-fold:
a) the "augmentation" logic is useful outside of process gdb-remote. For
instance, it would allow us to avoid repeating the register number
definitions in minidump code.
b) It gives more implementation freedom to the ABI classes. Now that
these "register infos" are essentially implementation details, classes
can use other methods to obtain dwarf/eh_frame register numbers -- for
instance they can consult llvm MC layer.
Since the augmentation code was not currently tested anywhere, I took
the opportunity to create a simple test for it.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg, tatyana-krasnukha
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70906
The idea is to remove front-end analysis for the parameter's value
modification and leave it to the value tracking system. Front-end in some
cases marks a parameter as modified even the line of code that modifies the
parameter gets optimized, that implies that this will cover more entry
values even. In addition, extending the support for modified parameters
will be easier with this approach.
Since the goal is to recognize if a parameter’s value has changed, the idea
at very high level is: If we encounter a DBG_VALUE other than the entry
value one describing the same variable (parameter), we can assume that the
variable’s value has changed and we should not track its entry value any
more. That would be ideal scenario, but due to various LLVM optimizations,
a variable’s value could be just moved around from one register to another
(and there will be additional DBG_VALUEs describing the same variable), so
we have to recognize such situation (otherwise, we will lose a lot of entry
values) and salvage the debug entry value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68209
I have either opened new bug reports for these tests, or added links to
existing bugs.
This should help make the lldb-aarch64-ubuntu buildbot green (there will
still be some unexpected passes that someone should look into, but those
can be handled later).
This reapplies: 8ff85ed905
Original commit message:
As a follow-up to my initial mail to llvm-dev here's a first pass at the O1 described there.
This change doesn't include any change to move from selection dag to fast isel
and that will come with other numbers that should help inform that decision.
There also haven't been any real debuggability studies with this pipeline yet,
this is just the initial start done so that people could see it and we could start
tweaking after.
Test updates: Outside of the newpm tests most of the updates are coming from either
optimization passes not run anymore (and without a compelling argument at the moment)
that were largely used for canonicalization in clang.
Original post:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131494.html
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65410
This reverts commit c9ddb02659.
Fix handling concurrent watchpoint events so that they are reported
correctly in LLDB.
If multiple watchpoints are hit concurrently, the NetBSD kernel reports
them as series of SIGTRAPs with a thread specified, and the debugger
investigates DR6 in order to establish which watchpoint was hit. This
is normally fine.
However, LLDB disables and reenables the watchpoint on all threads after
each hit, which results in the hit status from DR6 being wiped.
As a result, it can't establish which watchpoint was hit in successive
SIGTRAP processing.
In order to workaround this problem, clear DR6 only if the breakpoint
is overwritten with a new one. More specifically, move cleaning DR6
from ClearHardwareWatchpoint() to SetHardwareWatchpointWithIndex(),
and do that only if the newly requested watchpoint is different
from the one being set previously. This ensures that the disable-enable
logic of LLDB does not clear watchpoint hit status for the remaining
threads.
This also involves refactoring of watchpoint logic. With the old logic,
clearing watchpoint involved wiping dr6 & dr7, and setting it setting
dr{0..3} & dr7. With the new logic, only enable bit is cleared
from dr7, and the remaining bits are cleared/overwritten while setting
new watchpoint.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70025
NetBSD ptrace interface does not populate watchpoints to newly-created
threads. Solve this via copying the watchpoints from the current thread
when new thread is reported via TRAP_LWP.
Add a test that verifies that when the user does not have permissions
to set watchpoints on NetBSD, the 'watchpoint set' errors out gracefully
and thread monitoring does not crash on being unable to copy watchpoints
to new threads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70023
Implement major improvements to multithreaded program support. Notably,
support tracking new and exited threads, associate signals and events
with correct threads and support controlling individual threads when
resuming.
Firstly, use PT_SET_EVENT_MASK to enable reporting of created and exited
threads via SIGTRAP. Handle TRAP_LWP events to keep track
of the currently running threads.
Secondly, update the signal (both generic and SIGTRAP) handling code
to account for per-thread signals correctly. Signals delivered
to the whole process are reported on all threads, while per-thread
signals and events are reported only to the specific thread.
The remaining threads are marked as 'stopped with no reason'. Note that
NetBSD always stops all threads on debugger events.
Thirdly, implement the ability to set every thread as running, stopped
or single-stepping separately while continuing the process. This also
provides the ability to send a signal to the whole process or to one
of its thread while resuming.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70022
Split CallEdge into DirectCallEdge and IndirectCallEdge. Teach
DWARFExpression how to evaluate entry values in cases where the current
activation was created by an indirect call.
rdar://57094085
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70100
Summary: Ensure that breakpoint ivar is properly set in exception breakpoint resolver so that exception breakpoints set on dummy targets are resolved once real targets are created and run.
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69880
lldb would silently accept a response to the 'g' packet
(read all registers) which was too large; this handles the
case where it is too small.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70417
<rdar://problem/34916465>
It turns out that the ExprMutationAnalyzer can be very slow when AST
gets huge in some cases. The idea is to move this analysis to the LLVM
back-end level (more precisely, in the LiveDebugValues pass). The new
approach will remove the performance regression, simplify the
implementation and give us front-end independent implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68206
These tests are failing with various assertion failures, but they all
throw the following error message first:
error: a.out 0x0000002d: adding range [0x14-0x24) which has a base that
is less than the function's low PC 0x40060c.
See llvm.org/pr44037.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70381
Performance issues lead to the libc++ std::function formatter to be disabled. We addressed some of those performance issues by adding caching see D67111
This PR fixes the first lookup performance by not using FindSymbolsMatchingRegExAndType(...) and instead finding the compilation unit the std::function wrapped callable should be in and then searching for the callable directly in the CU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69913
The mock server pretends the process stopped with signal 17, which is
SIGCHLD on linux. This causes lldb to resume to process, utterly
confusing the test. Lldb probably shouldn't resume in this case, but for
now this issue can be fixed by changing the signal number to 2, which is
SIGINT just about anywhere.
until we can automatically fall back to p/P if g/G are not supported;
it looks like there is a bug in debugserver's g/G packets taht needs
to be fixed, or debugserver should stop supporting g/G until that bug
is fixed. But we need lldb to be able to fall back to p/P correctly
for that to be a viable workaround.
and that lldb uses the expedited register values in the ? packet
aka stop packet (T11 etc) and does not re-fetch them with the p packet.
This test is currently failing from the "[lldb-server] Add setting to
force 'g' packet use" commit; I'm marking it as @expectedFailureAll
until we can get this fixed.
Following up on https://reviews.llvm.org/D62221, this change introduces
the settings plugin.process.gdb-remote.use-g-packet-for-reading. When
they are on, 'g' packets are used for reading registers.
Using 'g' packets can improve performance by reducing the number of
packets exchanged between client and server when a large number of
registers needs to be fetched.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62931
Performance issues lead to the libc++ std::function formatter to be disabled.
This change is the first of two changes that should address the performance issues and allow us to enable the formatter again.
In some cases we end up scanning the symbol table for the callable wrapped by std::function for those cases we will now cache the results and used the cache in subsequent look-ups. This still leaves a large cost for the initial lookup which will be addressed in the next change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67111
To do so, we need to register the sanitizer libraries with the target
so that they get uploaded before running. This patch adds a helper to
the test class to this effect.
If you are running on macOS and have the CommandLineTools installed of
Xcode, this test will fail because CommandLineTools doesn't ship with
libMainThreadChecker. Skip the test if you don't have it installed.
The architecture enum contains two kinds of contstants: the "official" ones
defined by Microsoft, and unofficial constants added by breakpad to cover the
architectures not described by the first ones.
Up until now, there was no big need to differentiate between the two. However,
now that Microsoft has defined
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/sysinfoapi/ns-sysinfoapi-system_info
a constant for ARM64, we have a name clash.
This patch renames all breakpad-defined constants with to include the prefix
"BP_". This frees up the name "ARM64", which I'll re-introduce with the new
"official" value in a follow-up patch.
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69285
Summary:
Move breakpoints from the old, bad ArgInfo::count to the new, better
ArgInfo::max_positional_args. Soon ArgInfo::count will be no more.
It looks like this functionality is already well tested by
`TestBreakpointCommandsFromPython.py`, so there's no need to write
additional tests for it.
Reviewers: labath, jingham, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69468
This test was timing out on the swift CI bots. I didn't see any obvious reason
for that, and the test hasn't had problems on greendragon. OTOH, it was a bit
oddly written, and needed modernizing, so I did that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69453
For example, it is pretty easy to write a breakpoint command that implements "stop when my caller is Foo", and
it is pretty easy to write a breakpoint command that implements "stop when my caller is Bar". But there's no
way to write a generic "stop when my caller is..." function, and then specify the caller when you add the
command to a breakpoint.
With this patch, you can pass this data in a SBStructuredData dictionary. That will get stored in
the PythonCommandBaton for the breakpoint, and passed to the implementation function (if it has the right
signature) when the breakpoint is hit. Then in lldb, you can say:
(lldb) break com add -F caller_is -k caller_name -v Foo
More generally this will allow us to write reusable Python breakpoint commands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68671
Summary:
The minidump exception stream can report an exception record with
signal 0. If we try to create a stop reason with signal zero, processing
of the stop event won't find anything, and the debugger will hang.
So, simply early-out of RefreshStateAfterStop in this case.
Also set the UnixSignals object in DoLoadCore as is done for
ProcessElfCore.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg, jfb
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: dexonsmith, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68096
llvm-svn: 375244
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374631
Summary:
For context: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68293
We need a way to show all the processes on android regardless of the user id.
When you run `platform process list`, you only see the processes with the same user as the user that launched lldb-server. However, it's quite useful to see all the processes, though, and it will lay a foundation for full apk debugging support from lldb.
Before:
```
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
3234 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android adbd
8034 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9096 3234 aarch64-unknown-linux-android sh
9098 9096 aarch64-unknown-linux-android lldb-server
(lldb) ^D
```
Now:
```
(lldb) platform process list -x
205 matching processes were found on "remote-android"
PID PARENT USER TRIPLE NAME
====== ====== ========== ======================== ============================
1 0 init
524 1 init
525 1 init
531 1 ueventd
568 1 logd
569 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android servicemanager
570 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android hwservicemanager
571 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android vndservicemanager
577 1 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
580 577 aarch64-unknown-linux-android qseecomd
...
23816 979 com.android.providers.calendar
24600 979 com.verizon.mips.services
27888 979 com.hualai
28043 2378 com.android.chrome:sandboxed_process0
31449 979 com.att.shm
31779 979 com.samsung.android.authfw
31846 979 com.samsung.android.server.iris
32014 979 com.samsung.android.MtpApplication
32045 979 com.samsung.InputEventApp
```
Reviewers: labath,xiaobai,aadsm,clayborg
Subscribers:
> llvm-svn: 374584
llvm-svn: 374626
Jordan Rupprecht