Fixes PR4704 problems
Addresses Eli's patch feedback re: ugly cast code
Updates all postfix operators to remove ParenListExprs. While this is awful,
no better solution (say, in the parser) is obvious to me. Better solutions
welcome.
llvm-svn: 78621
--- Reverse-merging r78535 into '.':
D test/Sema/altivec-init.c
U include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
U include/clang/AST/Expr.h
U include/clang/AST/StmtNodes.def
U include/clang/Parse/Parser.h
U include/clang/Parse/Action.h
U tools/clang-cc/clang-cc.cpp
U lib/Frontend/PrintParserCallbacks.cpp
U lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp
U lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
U lib/Sema/Sema.h
U lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
U lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateExpr.cpp
U lib/AST/StmtProfile.cpp
U lib/AST/Expr.cpp
U lib/AST/StmtPrinter.cpp
U lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
U lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
llvm-svn: 78551
In addition to being defined by the AltiVec PIM, this is also the vector
initializer syntax used by OpenCL, so that vector literals are compatible
with macro arguments.
llvm-svn: 78535
point that covers templates and non-templates. This should eliminate
the flood of warnings I introduced yesterday.
Removed the ActOnClassTemplate action, which is no longer used.
llvm-svn: 76881
specifier resulted in the creation of a new TagDecl node, which
happens either when the tag specifier was a definition or when the tag
specifier was the first declaration of that tag type. This information
has several uses, the first of which is implemented in this commit:
1) In C++, one is not allowed to define tag types within a type
specifier (e.g., static_cast<struct S { int x; } *>(0) is
ill-formed) or within the result or parameter types of a
function. We now diagnose this.
2) We can extend DeclGroups to contain information about any tags
that are declared/defined within the declaration specifiers of a
variable, e.g.,
struct Point { int x, y, z; } p;
This will help improve AST printing and template instantiation,
among other things.
3) For C99, we can keep track of whether a tag type is defined
within the type of a parameter, to properly cope with cases like,
e.g.,
int bar(struct T2 { int x; } y) {
struct T2 z;
}
We can also do similar things wherever there is a type specifier,
e.g., to keep track of where the definition of S occurs in this
legal C99 code:
(struct S { int x, y; } *)0
llvm-svn: 72555
Daniel Dunbar