Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Stanislav Mekhanoshin 1bacdcf48d Extend LaneBitmask to 64 bit
This is needed for D74873, AMDGPU going to have 16 bit subregs
and the largest tuple is 32 VGPRs, which results in 64 lanes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75378
2020-03-02 12:10:52 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 4ad7685258 Revert "Revert "Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`"""
This reverts commit 80a34ae311 with fixes.

Previously, since bots turning on EXPENSIVE_CHECKS are essentially turning on
MachineVerifierPass by default on X86 and the fact that
inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll and inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
are not expected to generate functioning machine code, this would go
down to `report_fatal_error` in MachineVerifierPass. Here passing
`-verify-machineinstrs=0` to make the intent explicit.
2020-02-13 10:16:06 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 17122ec10a Revert "Revert "Revert "Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`""""
This reverts commit bb51d24330.
2020-02-13 10:08:05 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen bb51d24330 Revert "Revert "Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`"""
This reverts commit 80a34ae311 with fixes.

On bots llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-ubuntu and
llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian only,
llc returns 0 for these two tests unexpectedly. I tweaked the RUN line a little
bit in the hope that LIT is the culprit since this change is not in the
codepath these tests are testing.
llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\inline-asm-avx-v-constraint-32bit.ll
llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\inline-asm-avx512vl-v-constraint-32bit.ll
2020-02-13 10:02:53 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 80a34ae311 Revert "Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`""
This reverts commit rGcd5b308b828e, rGcd5b308b828e, rG8cedf0e2994c.

There are issues to be investigated for polly bots and bots turning on
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS.
2020-02-11 20:41:53 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 8cedf0e299 Reland "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`"
Summary:
Reland D67847 after D73742 is committed. Replace `sys::Process::Exit(1)`
with `abort` in `report_fatal_error`.

After this patch, for tools turning on `CrashRecoveryContext`,
crash handler installed by `CrashRecoveryContext` is called unless
they installed a non-returning handler using `llvm::install_fatal_error_handler`
like `cc1_main` currently does.

Reviewers: rnk, MaskRay, aganea, hans, espindola, jhenderson

Subscribers: jholewinski, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, steven_wu, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, dexonsmith, PkmX, rupprecht, jocewei, jsji, Jim, dmgreen, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, kerbowa, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74456
2020-02-11 18:20:40 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 6e24c6037f Revert "[Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`"
This reverts commit 647c3f4e47.

Got bots failure from sanitizer-windows and maybe others.
2020-01-15 17:52:25 -08:00
Yuanfang Chen 647c3f4e47 [Support] make report_fatal_error `abort` instead of `exit`
Summary:
This patch could be treated as a rebase of D33960. It also fixes PR35547.
A fix for `llvm/test/Other/close-stderr.ll` is proposed in D68164. Seems
the consensus is that the test is passing by chance and I'm not
sure how important it is for us. So it is removed like in D33960 for now.
The rest of the test fixes are just adding `--crash` flag to `not` tool.

** The reason it fixes PR35547 is

`exit` does cleanup including calling class destructor whereas `abort`
does not do any cleanup. In multithreading environment such as ThinLTO or JIT,
threads may share states which mostly are ManagedStatic<>. If faulting thread
tearing down a class when another thread is using it, there are chances of
memory corruption. This is bad 1. It will stop error reporting like pretty
stack printer; 2. The memory corruption is distracting and nondeterministic in
terms of error message, and corruption type (depending one the timing, it
could be double free, heap free after use, etc.).

Reviewers: rnk, chandlerc, zturner, sepavloff, MaskRay, espindola

Reviewed By: rnk, MaskRay

Subscribers: wuzish, jholewinski, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, arichardson, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits, MaskRay, filcab, davide, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, rupprecht, seiya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm, #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67847
2020-01-15 17:05:13 -08:00
Bjorn Pettersson b2154af25f [MachineVerifier] Relax checkLivenessAtDef regarding dead subreg defs
Summary:
Consider an instruction that has multiple defs of the same
vreg, but defining different subregs:
  %7.sub1:rc, dead %7.sub2:rc = inst

Calling checkLivenessAtDef for the live interval associated
with %7 incorrectly reported "live range continues after a
dead def". The live range for %7 has a dead def at the slot
index for "inst" even if the live range continues (given that
there are later uses of %7.sub1).

This patch adjusts MachineVerifier::checkLivenessAtDef
to allow dead subregister definitions, unless we are checking
a subrange (when tracking subregister liveness).

A limitation is that we do not detect the situation when the
live range continues past an instruction that defines the
full virtual register by multiple dead subreg defines.

I also removed some dead code related to physical register
in checkLivenessAtDef. Wwe only call that method for virtual
registers, so I added an assertion instead.

Reviewers: kparzysz

Reviewed By: kparzysz

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52237

llvm-svn: 342618
2018-09-20 06:59:18 +00:00