They can be deleted or replicated, so the cache may become outdated.
They only need to be visited once during frame lowering, so just scan
the function instead.
llvm-svn: 279297
Improved handling of fma, floating point min/max, additional load/store
instructions for floating point types.
Patch by Jyotsna Verma.
llvm-svn: 279239
If the mask of a vector shuffle has alternating odd or even numbers
starting with 1 or 0 respectively up to the largest possible index
for the given type in the given HVX mode (single of double) we can
generate vpacko or vpacke instruction respectively.
E.g.
%42 = shufflevector <32 x i16> %37, <32 x i16> %41,
<32 x i32> <i32 1, i32 3, ..., i32 63>
is %42.h = vpacko(%41.w, %37.w)
Patch by Pranav Bhandarkar.
llvm-svn: 277168
This is a mechanical change to make TargetLowering API take MachineInstr&
(instead of MachineInstr*), since the argument is expected to be a valid
MachineInstr. In one case, changed a parameter from MachineInstr* to
MachineBasicBlock::iterator, since it was used as an insertion point.
As a side effect, this removes a bunch of MachineInstr* to
MachineBasicBlock::iterator implicit conversions, a necessary step
toward fixing PR26753.
llvm-svn: 274287
This used to be free, copying and moving DebugLocs became expensive
after the metadata rewrite. Passing by reference eliminates a ton of
track/untrack operations. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 272512
Summary:
The CLR's personality routine passes these in rdx/edx, not rax/eax.
Make getExceptionPointerRegister a virtual method parameterized by
personality function to allow making this distinction.
Similarly make getExceptionSelectorRegister a virtual method parameterized
by personality function, for symmetry.
Reviewers: pgavlin, majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14344
llvm-svn: 252383
We used to have this magic "hasLoadLinkedStoreConditional()" callback,
which really meant two things:
- expand cmpxchg (to ll/sc).
- expand atomic loads using ll/sc (rather than cmpxchg).
Remove it, and, instead, introduce explicit callbacks:
- bool shouldExpandAtomicCmpXchgInIR(inst)
- AtomicExpansionKind shouldExpandAtomicLoadInIR(inst)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12557
llvm-svn: 247429
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11040
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241778
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, ted, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11028
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241775
There is some functional change here because it changes target code from
atoi(3) to StringRef::getAsInteger which has error checking. For valid
constraints there should be no difference.
llvm-svn: 241411
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
This is important because of different addressing modes
depending on the address space for GPU targets.
This only adds the argument, and does not update
any of the uses to provide the correct address space.
llvm-svn: 238723
Summary:
But still handle them the same way since I don't know how they differ on
this target.
No functional change intended.
Reviewers: kparzysz, adasgupt
Reviewed By: kparzysz, adasgupt
Subscribers: colinl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8204
Like for the PowerPC target, I've had to add 'i' to the constraint mappings in
order to pass 2007-12-17-InvokeAsm.ll. It's not clear why 'i' has historically
been treated as a memory constraint.
llvm-svn: 232480
Summary:
But still handle them the same way since I don't know how they differ on
this target.
No functional change intended.
Reviewers: kparzysz, adasgupt
Reviewed By: kparzysz, adasgupt
Subscribers: colinl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8204
llvm-svn: 232374
Summary:
This is instead of doing this in target independent code and is the last
non-functional change before targets begin to distinguish between
different memory constraints when selecting code for the ISD::INLINEASM
node.
Next, each target will individually move away from the idea that all
memory constraints behave like 'm'.
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8173
llvm-svn: 232373
Matt Arsenault