JavaScript allows keywords to appear in IdenfierName positions, e.g.
fields, or object literal members, but not as plain identifiers.
Patch by Martin Probst. Thank you!
llvm-svn: 248714
Before:
class Test {
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa): aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {}
}
After:
class Test {
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa):
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {}
}
llvm-svn: 241908
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Before:
var func =
function() {
doSomething();
};
After:
var func =
function() {
doSomething();
};
This is a very narrow special case which fixes most of the discrepency
with what our users do. In the long run, we should try to come up with
a more generic fix for indenting these.
llvm-svn: 240014
This makes this consistent with non-typescript enums.
Also shuffle the language-dependent stuff in mustBreakBefore to a
single location.
Patch initiated by Martin Probst.
llvm-svn: 239894
Before, these would not properly detected because of the char/string
literal found when re-lexing after the first `:
var x = `'`; // comment with matching quote '
var x = `"`; // comment with matching quote "
llvm-svn: 239693
statement.
When an exported function would follow a class declaration, it would not
be recognized as a stand-alone function. That would then collapse the
following line with the current one, e.g.
class C {}
export function f() {} var x;
llvm-svn: 239592
In the long run, these two might be independent or we might to only
allow specific combinations. Until we have a corresponding request,
however, it is hard to do the right thing and choose the right
configuration options. Thus, just don't touch the options yet and
just modify the behavior slightly.
llvm-svn: 239531
assignments as enums.
Top level object literals are treated as enums, and their k/v pairs are put on
separate lines:
X.Y = {
A: 1,
B: 2
};
However assignments within blocks should not be affected:
function x() {
y = {a:1, b:2};
}
This change fixes the second case. Patch by Martin Probst.
llvm-svn: 239462
This is a more correct representation than using "Equality" introduced
in r238942 which was a quick fix to solve an actual regression.
According to the typescript spec, arrows behave like "low-precedence"
assignments.
Before:
var a = a.aaaaaaa((a: a) => aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbbb) &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbb));
After:
var a = a.aaaaaaa((a: a) => aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbbb) &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbb));
llvm-svn: 239137
Before:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> = [
new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(),
new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()
];
After:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> =
[new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(), new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()];
llvm-svn: 238909
Before:
someFunction(() =>
{
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
After:
someFunction(() => {
doSomething(); // break
})
.doSomethingElse( // break
);
This is still bad, but at least it is consistent with what we do for other
function literals. Added corresponding tests.
llvm-svn: 238736
method expressions and array literals. They should not bind stronger
than regular parentheses or the braces of braced lists.
Specific test case in JavaScript:
Before:
var aaaaa: List<
SomeThing> = [new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(), new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()];
After:
var aaaaa: List<SomeThing> = [
new SomeThingAAAAAAAAAAAA(),
new SomeThingBBBBBBBBB()
];
llvm-svn: 238400
A definintion like this could not be formatted at all:
constructor({aa}: {
aa?: string,
aaaaaaaa?: string,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?: boolean,
aaaaaa?: List<string>
}) {
}
llvm-svn: 238291
Specifically, don't add a space before it.
Before:
someFunction(... a);
var x = [1, 2, ... a];
After:
someFunction(...a);
var x = [1, 2, ...a];
llvm-svn: 238183
Assigns a token type (TT_JsFatArrow) to => tokens, and uses that to
more easily recognize and format fat arrow functions.
Improves function parsing to better recognize formal parameter
lists and return type declarations.
Recognizes arrow functions and parse function bodies as child blocks.
Patch by Martin Probst.
llvm-svn: 237895
Optional methods use ? tokens like this:
interface X { y?(): z; }
It seems easiest to detect and disambiguate these from ternary
expressions by checking if the code is in a declaration context. Turns
out that that didn't quite work properly for interfaces in Java and JS,
and for JS file root contexts.
Patch by Martin Probst, thank you.
llvm-svn: 236488
Daniel Jasper