Track which basic blocks belong to which funclets. Permit branch
folding to fire but only if it can prove that doing so will not cause
code in one funclet to be reused in another.
llvm-svn: 249257
visitSIGN_EXTEND_INREG calls SelectionDAG::getNode to constant fold scalar constants but handles vector constants itself, despite getNode being capable of dealing with them.
This required a minor change to the getNode implementation to actually deal with cases where the scalars of a BUILD_VECTOR were wider integers than the vector type - which was the only extra ability of the visitSIGN_EXTEND_INREG implementation.
No codegen intended and all existing tests remain the same.
llvm-svn: 249236
We emit denormalized tables, where every range of invokes in the same
state gets a complete list of EH action entries. This is significantly
simpler than trying to infer the correct nested scoping structure from
the MI. Fortunately, for SEH, the nesting structure is really just a
size optimization.
With this, some basic __try / __except examples work.
llvm-svn: 249078
Catchret transfers control from a catch funclet to an earlier funclet.
However, it is not completely clear which funclet the catchret target is
part of. Make this clear by stapling the catchret target's funclet
membership onto the CATCHRET SDAG node.
llvm-svn: 249052
The Win64 unwinder disassembles forwards from each PC to try to
determine if this PC is in an epilogue. If so, it skips calling the EH
personality function for that frame. Typically, this means you cannot
catch an exception in the same frame that you threw it, because 'throw'
calls a noreturn runtime function.
Previously we avoided this problem with the TrapUnreachable
TargetOption, but that's a much bigger hammer than we need. All we need
is a 1 byte non-epilogue instruction right after the call. Instead,
what we got was an unconditional branch to a shared block containing the
ud2, potentially 7 bytes instead of 1. So, this reverts r206684, which
added TrapUnreachable, and replaces it with something better.
The new code pattern matches for invoke/call followed by unreachable and
inserts an int3 into the DAG. To be 100% watertight, we would need to
insert SEH_Epilogue instructions into all basic blocks ending in a call
with no terminators or successors, but in practice this is unlikely to
come up.
llvm-svn: 248959
HHVM calling convention, hhvmcc, is used by HHVM JIT for
functions in translated cache. We currently support LLVM back end to
generate code for X86-64 and may support other architectures in the
future.
In HHVM calling convention any GP register could be used to pass and
return values, with the exception of R12 which is reserved for
thread-local area and is callee-saved. Other than R12, we always
pass RBX and RBP as args, which are our virtual machine's stack pointer
and frame pointer respectively.
When we enter translation cache via hhvmcc function, we expect
the stack to be aligned at 16 bytes, i.e. skewed by 8 bytes as opposed
to standard ABI alignment. This affects stack object alignment and stack
adjustments for function calls.
One extra calling convention, hhvm_ccc, is used to call C++ helpers from
HHVM's translation cache. It is almost identical to standard C calling
convention with an exception of first argument which is passed in RBP
(before we use RDI, RSI, etc.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12681
llvm-svn: 248832
Summary:
Funclets have been turned into functions by the time they hit the object
file. Make sure that they have decent names for the symbol table and
CFI directives explaining how to reason about their prologues.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13261
llvm-svn: 248824
alignment requirements, for example in the case of vectors.
These requirements are exploited by the code generator by using
move instructions that have similar alignment requirements, e.g.,
movaps on x86.
Although the code generator properly aligns the arguments with
respect to the displacement of the stack pointer it computes,
the displacement itself may cause misalignment. For example if
we have
%3 = load <16 x float>, <16 x float>* %1, align 64
call void @bar(<16 x float> %3, i32 0)
the x86 back-end emits:
movaps 32(%ecx), %xmm2
movaps (%ecx), %xmm0
movaps 16(%ecx), %xmm1
movaps 48(%ecx), %xmm3
subl $20, %esp <-- if %esp was 16-byte aligned before this instruction, it no longer will be afterwards
movaps %xmm3, (%esp) <-- movaps requires 16-byte alignment, while %esp is not aligned as such.
movl $0, 16(%esp)
calll __bar
To solve this, we need to make sure that the computed value with which
the stack pointer is changed is a multiple af the maximal alignment seen
during its computation. With this change we get proper alignment:
subl $32, %esp
movaps %xmm3, (%esp)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12337
llvm-svn: 248786
When AA is being used, non-aliasing stores are canonicalized to use the same
chain, and DAGCombiner::getStoreMergeAndAliasCandidates can take advantage of
this by looking only as users of a store's chain operand. However, user
iteration is not result-number specific, we need to check that the use is as a
chain operand, and not via some other operand. It is certainly possible to have
another potentially-aliasing store, which shares the first's base pointer, and
uses the first's chain's node via some other operand.
Failure to catch this situation caused, at least in the included test case, an
assert later because the relative sequence-number ordering caused later
replacement to create a cycle in the DAG.
llvm-svn: 248698
Summary:
Factor the code that rewrites invokes to calls and rewrites WinEH
terminators to their "unwind to caller" equivalents into a helper in
Utils/Local, and use it in the three places I'm aware of that need to do
this.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13152
llvm-svn: 248677
I realized that the live-out set computed for the return block is
missing the callee saved registers (the non-pristine ones to be exact).
This only affects the liveness computed for instructions inside the
function epilogue which currently none of the LivePhysRegs users in llvm
cares about, so this is just a drive-by fix without a testcase.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13180
llvm-svn: 248636
This is a redo of D7208 ( r227242 - http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=227242 ).
The patch was reverted because an AArch64 target could infinite loop after the change in DAGCombiner
to merge vector stores. That happened because AArch64's allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses() wasn't telling
the truth. It reported all unaligned memory accesses as fast, but then split some 128-bit unaligned
accesses up in performSTORECombine() because they are slow.
This patch attempts to fix the problem in AArch's allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses() while preserving
existing (perhaps questionable) lowering behavior.
The x86 test shows that store merging is working as intended for a target with fast 32-byte unaligned
stores.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12635
llvm-svn: 248622
The algorithm would not modify the live-in list of blocks below the save
block point which is correct unless it happens to be a restore point at
the same time.
Also fixes the benign issue of live-in registers being added twice in
some cases.
The testcase is based on a test submitted by Kit Barton.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13176
llvm-svn: 248620
If a virtual register is copied and another copy was already
seen, replace with the previous copy. This only handles the
simplest cases for now.
This pattern shows up from various operand restrictions
AMDGPU has which require inserting copies depending
on the register class of the operands.
llvm-svn: 248611
Fixes the overflow case of llvm.*absdiff intrinsic also updats the tests and LangRef.rst accordingly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11678
llvm-svn: 248483
Allow a target to do something other than search for copies
that will avoid cross register bank copies.
Implement for SI by only rewriting the most basic copies,
so it should look through anything like a subregister extract.
I'm not entirely satisified with this because it seems like
eliminating a reg_sequence that isn't fully used should work
generically for all targets without them having to override
something. However, it seems to be tricky to have a simple
implementation of this without rewriting to invalid kinds
of subregister copies on some targets.
I'm not sure if there is currently a generic way to easily check
if a subregister index would be valid for the current use.
The current set of TargetRegisterInfo::get*Class functions don't
quite behave like I would expect (e.g. getSubClassWithSubReg
returns the maximal register class rather than the minimal), so
I'm not sure how to make the generic test keep searching if
SrcRC:SrcSubReg is a valid replacement for DefRC:DefSubReg. Making
the default implementation to check for simple copies breaks
a variety of ARM and x86 tests by producing illegal subregister uses.
The ARM tests are not actually changed since it should still be using
the same sharesSameRegisterFile implementation, this just relaxes
them to not check for specific registers.
llvm-svn: 248478
If the stores are storing values from loads which partially
alias the stores, we could end up placing the merged loads
and stores on the same chain which has the potential to break.
Each store may have a different chain dependency on only some
of the original loads. Create a new TokenFactor to capture all
of the required dependencies of the stores rather than assuming
all stores can use the same chain.
The testcase is a situation where this happens, although
it does not have an observable change from this. The DAG nodes
just happened to not be reordered before despite this missing
chain dependency.
This is based on an off-list report for an out of tree target
which regressed due to r246307 and I haven't managed to find a case
where the nodes do end up reordered with an in tree target.
llvm-svn: 248468
Add two new ways of accessing the unsafe stack pointer:
* At a fixed offset from the thread TLS base. This is very similar to
StackProtector cookies, but we plan to extend it to other backends
(ARM in particular) soon. Bionic-side implementation here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/170988.
* Via a function call, as a fallback for platforms that provide
neither a fixed TLS slot, nor a reasonable TLS implementation (i.e.
not emutls).
This is a re-commit of a change in r248357 that was reverted in
r248358.
llvm-svn: 248405
Add two new ways of accessing the unsafe stack pointer:
* At a fixed offset from the thread TLS base. This is very similar to
StackProtector cookies, but we plan to extend it to other backends
(ARM in particular) soon. Bionic-side implementation here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/170988.
* Via a function call, as a fallback for platforms that provide
neither a fixed TLS slot, nor a reasonable TLS implementation (i.e.
not emutls).
llvm-svn: 248357
Fixed the issue that when there is an edge from the jump table to the default statement, we should check it directly instead of checking if the sibling of the jump table header is a successor of the jump table header, which may not be the default statment but a successor of it.
llvm-svn: 248354
We may have subregister defs which are unused but not discovered and
cleaned up prior to liveness analysis. This creates multiple connected
components in the resulting live range which are forbidden in the
MachineVerifier because they would unnecesarily constrain the register
allocator. Rewrite those dead definitions to define a newly created
virtual register.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13035
llvm-svn: 248335
This improves ConnectedVNInfoEqClasses::Distribute() to distribute the
segments and value numbers in the subranges instead of conservatively
clearing all subregister info.
No separate test here, just clearing the subrange instead of properly
distributing them would however break my upcoming fix regarding dead super
register definitions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13075
llvm-svn: 248334
In the comparison failure block of a cmpxchg expansion, the initial
ldrex/ldxr will not be followed by a matching strex/stxr.
On ARM/AArch64, this unnecessarily ties up the execution monitor,
which might have a negative performance impact on some uarchs.
Instead, release the monitor in the failure block.
The clrex instruction was designed for this: use it.
Also see ARMARM v8-A B2.10.2:
"Exclusive access instructions and Shareable memory locations".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13033
llvm-svn: 248291
David Majnemer