Summary:
The instructions SeenExprs records may be deleted during rewriting.
FindClosestMatchingDominator should ignore these deleted instructions.
Fixes PR24301.
Reviewers: grosser
Subscribers: grosser, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13315
llvm-svn: 248983
The custom code produces incorrect results if later reassociated.
Since r221657, on x86, vNi32 uitofp is lowered using an optimized
sequence:
movdqa LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm1 ## xmm1 = [65535, ...]
pand %xmm0, %xmm1
por LCPI0_1(%rip), %xmm1 ## [0x4b000000, ...]
psrld $16, %xmm0
por LCPI0_2(%rip), %xmm0 ## [0x53000000, ...]
addps LCPI0_3(%rip), %xmm0 ## [float -5.497642e+11, ...]
addps %xmm1, %xmm0
Since r240361, the machine combiner opportunistically reassociates
2-instruction sequences (with -ffast-math). In the new code sequence,
the ADDPS' are eligible. In isolation, for simple examples (without
reassociable users), this makes no performance difference (the goal
being to enable reassociation of longer chains).
In the trivial example (just one uitofp), the reassociation doesn't
happen, because (I think) it would require the emission of a separate
movaps for a constantpool load (instead of folding it into addps).
However, when we have multiple uitofp sequences, and the constantpool
loads are CSE'd earlier, the machine combiner can do the reassociation.
When the ADDPS' are reassociated, the resulting sequence isn't correct
anymore, as we'd be adding large (2**39) constants with comparatively
smaller values (~2**23). Given that two of the three inputs are powers
of 2 larger than 2**16, and that ulp(2**39) == 2**(39-24) == 2**15,
the reassociated chain will produce 0 for any input in [0, 2**14[.
In my testing, it also produces wrong results for 99.5% of [0, 2**32[.
Avoid this by disabling the new lowering when -ffast-math. It does
mean that we'll get slower code than without it, but at least we
won't get egregiously incorrect code.
One might argue that, considering -ffast-math is all but meaningless,
uitofp producing wrong results isn't a compiler bug. But it really is.
Fixes PR24512.
...though this is really more of a workaround.
Ideally, we'd have some sort of Machine FMF, but that's a problem
that's not worth tackling until we do more with machine IR.
llvm-svn: 248965
The Win64 unwinder disassembles forwards from each PC to try to
determine if this PC is in an epilogue. If so, it skips calling the EH
personality function for that frame. Typically, this means you cannot
catch an exception in the same frame that you threw it, because 'throw'
calls a noreturn runtime function.
Previously we avoided this problem with the TrapUnreachable
TargetOption, but that's a much bigger hammer than we need. All we need
is a 1 byte non-epilogue instruction right after the call. Instead,
what we got was an unconditional branch to a shared block containing the
ud2, potentially 7 bytes instead of 1. So, this reverts r206684, which
added TrapUnreachable, and replaces it with something better.
The new code pattern matches for invoke/call followed by unreachable and
inserts an int3 into the DAG. To be 100% watertight, we would need to
insert SEH_Epilogue instructions into all basic blocks ending in a call
with no terminators or successors, but in practice this is unlikely to
come up.
llvm-svn: 248959
Unscaled load/store combining has been enabled since the initial ARM64 port. No
need for a redundance run. Also, add CHECK-LABEL directives.
llvm-svn: 248945
Summary:
Given an array of i2 elements, 4 consecutive scalar loads will be lowered to
i8-sized loads and thus will access 4 consecutive bytes in memory. If we
vectorize these loads into a single <4 x i2> load, it'll access only 1 byte in
memory. Hence, we should prohibit vectorization in such cases.
PS: Initial patch was proposed by Arnold.
Reviewers: aschwaighofer, nadav, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13277
llvm-svn: 248943
The test requires X86 target support, and checks the actual debug
info contents, including register numbers which would be different on
other platforms.
llvm-svn: 248938
Previously, the index was constrained to the size of the memory operation for
no apparent reason. This change removes that constraint so that we can form
pre-index instructions with any valid offset.
llvm-svn: 248931
As Richard Barton observed at http://reviews.llvm.org/D12937#inline-107121
TargetParser in LLVM has insufficient support for ARMv6Z and ARMv6ZK.
In particular, there were no tests for TrustZone being supported in these
architectures.
The patch clears a FIXME: left by Saleem Abdulrasool in r201471, and fixes
his test case which hadn't really been testing what it was claiming to test.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13236
llvm-svn: 248921
Usually large blocks are not a problem. But if a large block (> 10k instructions)
contains many (potential) chains of vector instructions, and those chains are
spread over a wide range of instructions, then scheduling becomes a compile time problem.
This change introduces a limit for the accumulate scheduling region size of a block.
For real-world functions this limit will never be exceeded (it's about 10x larger than
the maximum value seen in the test-suite and external test suite).
llvm-svn: 248917
This patch teaches InstCombiner how to convert a SSSE3/AVX2 byte shuffle to a
builtin shuffle if the mask is constant.
Converting byte shuffle intrinsic calls to builtin shuffles can help finding
more opportunities for combining shuffles later on in selection dag.
We may end up with byte shuffles with constant masks as the result of inlining.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13252
llvm-svn: 248913
This commit changes the interface of the vld[1234], vld[234]lane, and vst[1234],
vst[234]lane ARM neon intrinsics and associates an address space with the
pointer that these intrinsics take. This changes, e.g.,
<2 x i32> @llvm.arm.neon.vld1.v2i32(i8*, i32)
to
<2 x i32> @llvm.arm.neon.vld1.v2i32.p0i8(i8*, i32)
This change ensures that address spaces are fully taken into account in the ARM
target during lowering of interleaved loads and stores.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12985
llvm-svn: 248887
The XOP shifts just have logical/arithmetic versions and the left/right shifts are controlled by whether the value is positive/negative. Because of this I've added new X86ISD nodes instead of trying to force them to use the existing shift nodes.
Additionally Excavator cores (bdver4) support XOP and AVX2 - meaning that it should use the AVX2 shifts when it can and fall back to XOP in other cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8690
llvm-svn: 248878
The x64 ABI requires that epilogues do not contain code other than stack
adjustments and some limited control flow. However, we'd insert code to
initialize the return address after stack adjustments. Instead, insert
EAX/RAX with the current value before we create the stack adjustments in
the epilogue.
llvm-svn: 248839
HHVM calling convention, hhvmcc, is used by HHVM JIT for
functions in translated cache. We currently support LLVM back end to
generate code for X86-64 and may support other architectures in the
future.
In HHVM calling convention any GP register could be used to pass and
return values, with the exception of R12 which is reserved for
thread-local area and is callee-saved. Other than R12, we always
pass RBX and RBP as args, which are our virtual machine's stack pointer
and frame pointer respectively.
When we enter translation cache via hhvmcc function, we expect
the stack to be aligned at 16 bytes, i.e. skewed by 8 bytes as opposed
to standard ABI alignment. This affects stack object alignment and stack
adjustments for function calls.
One extra calling convention, hhvm_ccc, is used to call C++ helpers from
HHVM's translation cache. It is almost identical to standard C calling
convention with an exception of first argument which is passed in RBP
(before we use RDI, RSI, etc.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12681
llvm-svn: 248832
Summary:
Funclets have been turned into functions by the time they hit the object
file. Make sure that they have decent names for the symbol table and
CFI directives explaining how to reason about their prologues.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13261
llvm-svn: 248824
PDB files have a lot of noise in them, with hundreds (or thousands)
of symbols from system libraries and compiler generated types. If
you're only looking for a specific type, this can be problematic.
This CL allows you to display *only* types, variables, or compilands
matching a particular pattern. These filters can even be combined
with exclude filters. Include-only filters are given priority, so
that first the set of items to display is limited only to those that
match the include filters, and then the set of exclude filters is
applied to those. If there are no include filters specified, then
it means "display everything".
llvm-svn: 248822
If a PHI starts at a non-negative constant, monotonically increases
(only adds of a constant are supported at the moment) and that add
does not wrap, then the PHI is known never to be zero.
llvm-svn: 248796
alignment requirements, for example in the case of vectors.
These requirements are exploited by the code generator by using
move instructions that have similar alignment requirements, e.g.,
movaps on x86.
Although the code generator properly aligns the arguments with
respect to the displacement of the stack pointer it computes,
the displacement itself may cause misalignment. For example if
we have
%3 = load <16 x float>, <16 x float>* %1, align 64
call void @bar(<16 x float> %3, i32 0)
the x86 back-end emits:
movaps 32(%ecx), %xmm2
movaps (%ecx), %xmm0
movaps 16(%ecx), %xmm1
movaps 48(%ecx), %xmm3
subl $20, %esp <-- if %esp was 16-byte aligned before this instruction, it no longer will be afterwards
movaps %xmm3, (%esp) <-- movaps requires 16-byte alignment, while %esp is not aligned as such.
movl $0, 16(%esp)
calll __bar
To solve this, we need to make sure that the computed value with which
the stack pointer is changed is a multiple af the maximal alignment seen
during its computation. With this change we get proper alignment:
subl $32, %esp
movaps %xmm3, (%esp)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12337
llvm-svn: 248786
Currently SimplifyDemandedVectorElts can only peek through bitcasts if the vectors have the same number of elements.
This patch fixes and enables some existing (disabled) code to support bitcasting to vectors with more/fewer elements. It currently only accepts cases when vectors alias cleanly (i.e. number of elements are an exact multiple of the other vector).
This was added to improve the demanded vector elements support for SSE vector shifts which require the __m128i (<2 x i64>) argument type to be bitcast to the vector type for the builtin shift. I've added extra tests for various additional bitcasts.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12935
llvm-svn: 248784
Summary: This patch adds block frequency analysis to LoopUnswitch pass to recognize hot/cold regions. For cold regions the pass only performs trivial unswitches since they do not increase code size, and for hot regions everything works as before. This helps to minimize code growth in cold regions and be more aggressive in hot regions. Currently the default cold regions are blocks with frequencies below 20% of function entry frequency, and it can be adjusted via -loop-unswitch-cold-block-frequency flag. The entire feature is controlled via -loop-unswitch-with-block-frequency flag and it is off by default.
Reviewers: broune, silvas, dnovillo, reames
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11605
llvm-svn: 248777
Place new and update dbg.declare calls immediately after the
corresponding alloca.
Current code in replaceDbgDeclareForAlloca puts the new dbg.declare
at the end of the basic block. LLVM codegen has problems emitting
debug info in a situation when dbg.declare appears after all uses of
the variable. This usually kinda works for inlining and ASan (two
users of this function) but not for SafeStack (see the pending change
in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13178).
llvm-svn: 248769
`ScalarEvolution::isImpliedCondOperandsViaNoOverflow` tries to cast the
operand type of the comparison it is given to an `IntegerType`. This is
incorrect because it could actually be simplifying a comparison between
two pointers. Switch it to using `getTypeSizeInBits` instead, which
does the right thing for both pointers and integers.
Fixed PR24956.
llvm-svn: 248743
Patch by Jake VanAdrighem!
Summary:
Fix the way we sort the llvm.used and llvm.compiler.used members.
This bug seems to have been introduced in rL183756 through a set of improper casts to GlobalValue*. In subsequent patches this problem was missed and transformed into a getName call on a ConstantExpr.
Reviewers: silvas
Subscribers: silvas, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12851
llvm-svn: 248728
This was split off of http://reviews.llvm.org/D13040 to make it easier to test the correctness of the implication logic. For the moment, this only handles a single easy case which shows up when eliminating and combining range checks. In the (near) future, I plan to extend this for other cases which show up in range checks, but I wanted to make those changes incrementally once the framework was in place.
At the moment, the implication logic will be used by three places. One in InstSimplify (this review) and two in SimplifyCFG (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13040 & http://reviews.llvm.org/D13070). Can anyone think of other locations this style of reasoning would make sense?
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13074
llvm-svn: 248719
Originally, debug intrinsics and annotation intrinsics may prevent
the loop to be rerolled, now they are ignored.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13150
llvm-svn: 248718
When AA is being used, non-aliasing stores are canonicalized to use the same
chain, and DAGCombiner::getStoreMergeAndAliasCandidates can take advantage of
this by looking only as users of a store's chain operand. However, user
iteration is not result-number specific, we need to check that the use is as a
chain operand, and not via some other operand. It is certainly possible to have
another potentially-aliasing store, which shares the first's base pointer, and
uses the first's chain's node via some other operand.
Failure to catch this situation caused, at least in the included test case, an
assert later because the relative sequence-number ordering caused later
replacement to create a cycle in the DAG.
llvm-svn: 248698
Before this change `HasSameValue` would return true for distinct
`alloca` instructions if they happened to be allocating the same
type (`alloca` instructions are not specified as reading memory). This
change adds an explicit whitelist of instruction types for which
"identical" instructions compute the same value.
Fixes PR24952.
llvm-svn: 248690
This is one step towards solving PR24766:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
We were not producing the same IR for these two C functions because the store
to the temp bool causes extra zexts:
#include <stdbool.h>
bool switchy(char x1, char x2, char condition) {
bool conditionMet = false;
switch (condition) {
case 0: conditionMet = (x1 == x2); break;
case 1: conditionMet = (x1 <= x2); break;
}
return conditionMet;
}
bool switchy2(char x1, char x2, char condition) {
switch (condition) {
case 0: return (x1 == x2);
case 1: return (x1 <= x2);
}
return false;
}
As noted in the code comments, this test case manages to avoid the more general existing
phi optimizations where there are only 2 phi inputs or where there are no constant phi
args mixed in with the casts ops. It seems like a corner case, but if we don't catch it,
then I don't think we can get SimplifyCFG to further optimize towards the canonical form
for this function shown in the bug report.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12866
llvm-svn: 248689
Summary:
Factor the code that rewrites invokes to calls and rewrites WinEH
terminators to their "unwind to caller" equivalents into a helper in
Utils/Local, and use it in the three places I'm aware of that need to do
this.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13152
llvm-svn: 248677
Summary:
This is the second part of fixing bug 24848 https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24848.
If both operands of a comparison have range metadata, they should be used to constant fold the comparison.
Reviewers: sanjoy, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13177
llvm-svn: 248650
Trying to use the version with the explicit output operand
would complain because of the missing WriteSALU. I'm not sure
why it doesn't complain about this with the implicit VCC def.
llvm-svn: 248646
Summary:
If the trip count of a specific backedge is `N`, then we know that
backedge is effectively guarded by the condition `{0,+,1} u< N`. This
change teaches SCEV to use this condition to prove things in
`isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond`.
Depends on D12948
Depends on D12949
The original checkin, r248608 had to be backed out due to an issue with
a ObjCXX unit test. That issue is now fixed, so re-landing.
Reviewers: atrick, reames, majnemer, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12950
llvm-svn: 248638
Summary:
This change teaches SCEV's `isImpliedCond` two new identities:
A u< B u< -C => (A + C) u< (B + C)
A s< B s< INT_MIN - C => (A + C) s< (B + C)
While these are useful on their own, they're really intended to support
D12950.
The original checkin, r248606 had to be backed out due to an issue with
a ObjCXX unit test. That issue is now fixed, so re-landing.
Reviewers: atrick, reames, majnemer, nlewycky, hfinkel
Subscribers: aadg, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12948
llvm-svn: 248637
This is a fix for PR22723:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22723
My first attempt at this was to change what I thought was the root problem:
xor (zext i1 X to i32), 1 --> zext (xor i1 X, true) to i32
...but we create the opposite pattern in InstCombiner::visitZExt(), so infinite loop!
My next idea was to fix the matchIfNot() implementation in PatternMatch, but that would
mean potentially returning a different size for the match than what was input. I think
this would require all users of m_Not to check the size of the returned match, so I
abandoned that idea.
I settled on just fixing the exact case presented in the PR. This patch does allow the
2 functions in PR22723 to compile identically (x86):
bool test(bool x, bool y) { return !x | !y; }
bool test(bool x, bool y) { return !x || !y; }
...
andb %sil, %dil
xorb $1, %dil
movb %dil, %al
retq
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12705
llvm-svn: 248634
BranchProbability now is represented by its numerator and denominator in uint32_t type. This patch changes this representation into a fixed point that is represented by the numerator in uint32_t type and a constant denominator 1<<31. This is quite similar to the representation of BlockMass in BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.h. There are several pros and cons of this change:
Pros:
1. It uses only a half space of the current one.
2. Some operations are much faster like plus, subtraction, comparison, and scaling by an integer.
Cons:
1. Constructing a probability using arbitrary numerator and denominator needs additional calculations.
2. It is a little less precise than before as we use a fixed denominator. For example, 1 - 1/3 may not be exactly identical to 1 / 3 (this will lead to many BranchProbability unit test failures). This should not matter when we only use it for branch probability. If we use it like a rational value for some precise calculations we may need another construct like ValueRatio.
One important reason for this change is that we propose to store branch probabilities instead of edge weights in MachineBasicBlock. We also want clients to use probability instead of weight when adding successors to a MBB. The current BranchProbability has more space which may be a concern.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12603
llvm-svn: 248633
This is a redo of D7208 ( r227242 - http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=227242 ).
The patch was reverted because an AArch64 target could infinite loop after the change in DAGCombiner
to merge vector stores. That happened because AArch64's allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses() wasn't telling
the truth. It reported all unaligned memory accesses as fast, but then split some 128-bit unaligned
accesses up in performSTORECombine() because they are slow.
This patch attempts to fix the problem in AArch's allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses() while preserving
existing (perhaps questionable) lowering behavior.
The x86 test shows that store merging is working as intended for a target with fast 32-byte unaligned
stores.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12635
llvm-svn: 248622
The algorithm would not modify the live-in list of blocks below the save
block point which is correct unless it happens to be a restore point at
the same time.
Also fixes the benign issue of live-in registers being added twice in
some cases.
The testcase is based on a test submitted by Kit Barton.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13176
llvm-svn: 248620
If a virtual register is copied and another copy was already
seen, replace with the previous copy. This only handles the
simplest cases for now.
This pattern shows up from various operand restrictions
AMDGPU has which require inserting copies depending
on the register class of the operands.
llvm-svn: 248611
Summary:
If the trip count of a specific backedge is `N`, then we know that
backedge is effectively guarded by the condition `{0,+,1} u< N`. This
change teaches SCEV to use this condition to prove things in
`isLoopBackedgeGuardedByCond`.
Depends on D12948
Depends on D12949
Reviewers: atrick, reames, majnemer, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12950
llvm-svn: 248608
Summary:
This change teaches SCEV's `isImpliedCond` two new identities:
A u< B u< -C => (A + C) u< (B + C)
A s< B s< INT_MIN - C => (A + C) s< (B + C)
While these are useful on their own, they're really intended to support
D12950.
Reviewers: atrick, reames, majnemer, nlewycky, hfinkel
Subscribers: aadg, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12948
llvm-svn: 248606
This fixes a select error when the i64 source was also
bitcasted to v2i32 in the original source.
Instead of awkwardly trying to select the modified source value and
the store, replace before isel begins.
Uses a worklist to avoid possible problems from mutating the DAG,
although it seems to work OK without it.
llvm-svn: 248589
These were all using the default 32-bit VALU write class,
but the i64/f64 compares are half rate.
I'm not sure this is really correct, because they are still using
the write to VALU write class, even though they really write
to the SALU.
llvm-svn: 248582
Arguments to function calls marked "nocapture" can be marked as
non-escaping. However, nocapture is defined in terms of the lifetime
of the callee, and if the callee can directly or indirectly recurse to
the caller, the semantics of nocapture are invalid.
Therefore, we eagerly discover which SCC each function belongs to,
and later can check if callee and caller of a callsite belong to
the same SCC, in which case there could be recursion.
This means that we can't be so optimistic in
getModRefInfo(ImmutableCallsite) - previously we assumed all call
arguments never aliased with an escaping global. Now we need to check,
because a global could now be passed as an argument but still not
escape.
This also solves a related conformance problem: MemCpyOptimizer can
turn non-escaping stores of globals into calls to intrinsics like
llvm.memcpy/llvm/memset. This confuses GlobalsAA, which knows the
global can't escape and so returns NoModRef when queried, when
obviously a memcpy/memset call does indeed reference and modify its
arguments.
This fixes PR24800, PR24801, and PR24802.
llvm-svn: 248576
We now emit the compiler generated divide by zero check that was needed for the
MSVC routines. We construct a psuedo-instruction for the DBZ check as the
operation requires splitting up the BB. For the 64-bit operations, we need to
custom expand the node as we need to insert the DBZ check and then emit the
libcall to the appropriate name. Because this is target specific, it seemed
better to reproduce the expansion operation from the target-agnostic type
legalization rather than sink this there to avoid the duplication. The division
library calls now match MSVC semantically.
llvm-svn: 248561
Summary:
This also adds the first set of tests for operand bundles.
The optimizer has not been audited to ensure that it does the right
thing with operand bundles.
Depends on D12456.
Reviewers: reames, chandlerc, majnemer, dexonsmith, kmod, JosephTremoulet, rnk, bogner
Subscribers: maksfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12457
llvm-svn: 248551
Add a FreeBSD test to restore testing of ELF OSABI other than
ELFOSABI_NONE after r248534.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13146
llvm-svn: 248550
Fix for D12561 - we weren't correctly ensuring that the base element for extension was moved to start on a boundary suitable for UNPCKL/H
llvm-svn: 248536
The doesn't seem to be a difference and ELFOSABI_NONE seems to be far more
common:
* Linux doesn't care when loading and puts ELFOSABI_NONE on core dumps.
* Gold and bfd ld produce files with ELFOSABI_NONE.
* Gold and bfd ld seems to ignore EI_OSABI other than for freebsd.
* Gas puts ELFOSABI_NONE in most .o files.
llvm-svn: 248534
These are necessary for implementing mem_fence for
OpenCL 2.0.
The VI assembler tests are disabled since it seems to be
using the wrong encoding or opcode.
llvm-svn: 248532
If the shifter operand is a constant, and all of the bits shifted out
are known to be zero, then if X is known non-zero at least one
non-zero bit must remain.
llvm-svn: 248508
Fixes the overflow case of llvm.*absdiff intrinsic also updats the tests and LangRef.rst accordingly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11678
llvm-svn: 248483
Allow a target to do something other than search for copies
that will avoid cross register bank copies.
Implement for SI by only rewriting the most basic copies,
so it should look through anything like a subregister extract.
I'm not entirely satisified with this because it seems like
eliminating a reg_sequence that isn't fully used should work
generically for all targets without them having to override
something. However, it seems to be tricky to have a simple
implementation of this without rewriting to invalid kinds
of subregister copies on some targets.
I'm not sure if there is currently a generic way to easily check
if a subregister index would be valid for the current use.
The current set of TargetRegisterInfo::get*Class functions don't
quite behave like I would expect (e.g. getSubClassWithSubReg
returns the maximal register class rather than the minimal), so
I'm not sure how to make the generic test keep searching if
SrcRC:SrcSubReg is a valid replacement for DefRC:DefSubReg. Making
the default implementation to check for simple copies breaks
a variety of ARM and x86 tests by producing illegal subregister uses.
The ARM tests are not actually changed since it should still be using
the same sharesSameRegisterFile implementation, this just relaxes
them to not check for specific registers.
llvm-svn: 248478
If the stores are storing values from loads which partially
alias the stores, we could end up placing the merged loads
and stores on the same chain which has the potential to break.
Each store may have a different chain dependency on only some
of the original loads. Create a new TokenFactor to capture all
of the required dependencies of the stores rather than assuming
all stores can use the same chain.
The testcase is a situation where this happens, although
it does not have an observable change from this. The DAG nodes
just happened to not be reordered before despite this missing
chain dependency.
This is based on an off-list report for an out of tree target
which regressed due to r246307 and I haven't managed to find a case
where the nodes do end up reordered with an in tree target.
llvm-svn: 248468
Instead of always inserting a copy in case
the super register is itself a subregister,
only extract to the super reg class if this is
actually the case.
This shouldn't really change codegen, but
makes looking at the output of SIFixSGPRCopies
easier to read.
llvm-svn: 248467
In -fprofile-instr-generate compilation, to remove the redundant profile
variables for the COMDAT functions, these variables are placed in the same
COMDAT group as its associated function. This way when the COMDAT function
is not picked by the linker, those profile variables will also not be
output in the final binary. This may cause warning when mix link objects
built w and wo -fprofile-instr-generate.
This patch puts the profile variables for COMDAT functions to its own COMDAT
group to avoid the problem.
Patch by xur.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12248
llvm-svn: 248440
...because that's what the cost model was intended to do.
As discussed in D12882, this fix has a temporary unintended consequence for
SimplifyCFG: it causes us to not speculate an fdiv. However, two wrongs make
PR24818 right, and two wrongs make PR24343 act right even though it's really
still wrong.
I intend to correct SimplifyCFG and add to CodeGenPrepare to account for this
cost model change and preserve the righteousness for the bug report cases.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24818https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24343
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12882
llvm-svn: 248439
This time, the issue is that we weren't accounting for the possibility that
aligned DPRs could have been stored after the final "push" in a prologue. When
that happened we effectively moved a "sub sp, #N" from below the aligned stores
to above them, and everything went to pot.
To make it worse, I'd actually committed something testing that we produced
wrong code, so the test update is tiny.
llvm-svn: 248437
so the lookup works as expected after prepending the oso-prepend-path.
This manifested only on Windows, because "/" is not a relative path there.
llvm-svn: 248423
Patch by: simoncook
Unlike BitCasts, AddrSpaceCasts do not always produce an output the same size as its input, which was previously assumed. This fixes cases where two address spaces do not have the same size pointer, as an assertion failure would occur when trying to prove deferenceability. LoopUnswitch is used in the particular test, but LICM also exhibits the same problem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13008
llvm-svn: 248422
Scott Douglass