An empty string for an ASM input constraint is invalid, and will crash
during clang CodeGen. Change TargetInfo::validateInputConstraint to
reject an empty string.
<rdar://problem/15552191>
llvm-svn: 197362
We already support using "r" on 64-bit values (a GPRPair is
allocated), but Sema doesn't know this yet so issues a warning. This
should fix it.
llvm-svn: 196724
- krait processor currently modeled with the same features as A9.
- Krait processor additionally has VFP4 (fused multiply add/sub)
and hardware division features enabled.
- krait has currently the same Schedule model as A9
- krait cpu flag is not recognized by the GNU assembler yet,
it is replaced with march=armv7-a to avoid a lower march
from being used.
llvm-svn: 196618
There seem to be quite a few references to the old macro __ARM_NEON__ on the
internet, so I don't think it's a good idea to remove it entirely (at least
yet), but the canonical name does not have the trailing underscores so we
should use that ourselves.
llvm-svn: 195353
We already have builtins that are only available in GNU mode, so this
mirrors that.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2128
llvm-svn: 194615
Like GCC, this re-uses the 'f' constraint and a new 'w' print-modifier:
asm ("ldi.w %w0, 1", "=f"(result));
Unlike GCC, the 'w' print-modifer is not _required_ to produce the intended
output. This is a consequence of differences in the internal handling of
the registers in each compiler. To be source-compatible between the
compilers, users must use the 'w' print-modifier.
MSA registers (including control registers) are supported in clobber lists.
llvm-svn: 194476
substitution failure, allow a flag to be set on the Diagnostic object,
to mark it as 'causes substitution failure'.
Refactor Diagnostic.td and the tablegen to use an enum for SFINAE behavior
rather than a bunch of flags.
llvm-svn: 194444
This change fixes Richard's testcase for r193815. Now we include non-explicit
submodules into the list of exports.
The test failed previously because:
- recursive_visibility_a1.inner is not imported (only recursive_visibility_a1 is),
- thus the 'inner' submodule is not showing up in any of the import lists,
- and because of this getExportedModules() is not returning the
correct module set -- it only considers modules that are imported.
The fix is to make Module::getExportedModules() include non-explicit submodules
into the list of exports.
llvm-svn: 194018
This change makes Module::buildVisibleModulesCache() collect exported modules
recursively.
While computing a set of exports, getExportedModules() iterates over the set of
imported modules and filters it. But it does not consider the set of exports
of those modules -- it is the responsibility of the caller to do this.
Here is a certain instance of this issue. Module::isModuleVisible says that
CoreFoundation.CFArray submodule is not visible from Cocoa. Why?
- Cocoa imports Foundation.
- Foundation has an export restriction: "export *".
- Foundation imports CoreFoundation. (Just the top-level module.)
- CoreFoundation exports CoreFoundation.CFArray.
To decide which modules are visible from Cocoa, we collect all exported modules
from immediate imports in Cocoa:
> visibleModulesFro(Cocoa) = exported(Foundation) + exported(CoreData) + exported(AppKit)
To find out which modules are exported, we filter imports according to
restrictions:
> exported(Foundation) = filterByModuleMapRestrictions(imports(Foundation))
Because Foundation imports CoreFoundation (not CoreFoundation.CFArray), the
CFArray submodule is considered not exported from Foundation, and is not
visible from Cocoa (according to Module::isModuleVisible).
llvm-svn: 193815
Enables the clang driver to begin targeting specific CPUs. Introduced a
"generic" CPU which will ensure that the optional FP feature is enabled
by default when it gets to LLVM, without needing any extra arguments.
Cortex-A53 and A-57 are also introduced with tests, although backend
handling of them does not yet exist.
llvm-svn: 193740
requires ! feature
The purpose of this is to allow (for instance) the module map for /usr/include
to exclude <tgmath.h> and <complex.h> when building in C++ (these headers are
instead provided by the C++ standard library in this case, and the glibc C
<tgmath.h> header would otherwise try to include <complex.h>, resulting in a
module cycle).
llvm-svn: 193549
Although we wire up a bit for v8fp for macro setting
purposes, we don't set a macro yet. Need to ask list
about that.
Change-Id: Ic9819593ce00882fbec72757ffccc6f0b18160a0
llvm-svn: 193367
Rafael Espindola