If the result of an atomic operation is not used then it can be more
efficient to build a reduction across all lanes instead of a scan. Do
this for GFX10, where the permlanex16 instruction makes it viable. For
wave64 this saves a couple of dpp operations. For wave32 it saves one
readlane (which are generally bad for performance) and one dpp
operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98953
Split out some of the instructions predicated on the dot2-insts target
feature into a new dot7-insts, in preparation for subtargets that have
some but not all of these instructions. NFCI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98717
gfx1030 added a new way to implement readcyclecounter using the
SHADER_CYCLES hardware register, but the s_memtime instruction still
exists, so the MC layer should still accept it and the
llvm.amdgcn.s.memtime intrinsic should still work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97928
gfx90a operations require even aligned registers, but this was
previously achieved by reserving registers inside the full class.
Ideally this would be captured in the static instruction definitions
for the operands, and we would have different instructions per
subtarget. The hackiest part of this is we need to manually reassign
AGPR register classes after instruction selection (we get away without
this for VGPRs since those types are actually registered for legal
types).
Support for XNACK and SRAMECC is not static on some GPUs. We must be able
to differentiate between different scenarios for these dynamic subtarget
features.
The possible settings are:
- Unsupported: The GPU has no support for XNACK/SRAMECC.
- Any: Preference is unspecified. Use conservative settings that can run anywhere.
- Off: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC Off
- On: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC On
GCNSubtarget will track the four options based on the following criteria. If
the subtarget does not support XNACK/SRAMECC we say the setting is
"Unsupported". If no subtarget features for XNACK/SRAMECC are requested we
must support "Any" mode. If the subtarget features XNACK/SRAMECC exist in the
feature string when initializing the subtarget, the settings are "On/Off".
The defaults are updated to be conservatively correct, meaning if no setting
for XNACK or SRAMECC is explicitly requested, defaults will be used which
generate code that can be run anywhere. This corresponds to the "Any" setting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85882
Stanislav Mekhanoshin