This is a work-in-progress implementation of an assembler for M68k.
Outstanding work:
- Updating existing tests assembly syntax
- Writing new tests for the assembler (and disassembler)
I've left those until there's consensus that this approach is okay (I hope that's okay!).
Questions I'm aware of:
- Should this use Motorola or gas syntax? (At the moment it uses Motorola syntax.)
- The disassembler produces a table at runtime for disassembly generated from the code beads. Is this okay? (This is less than ideal but as I mentioned in my llvm-dev post, it's quite complicated to write a table-gen parser for code beads.)
Depends on D98519
Depends on D98532
Depends on D98534
Depends on D98535
Depends on D98536
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98537
Min-Yih Hsu