Support for XNACK and SRAMECC is not static on some GPUs. We must be able
to differentiate between different scenarios for these dynamic subtarget
features.
The possible settings are:
- Unsupported: The GPU has no support for XNACK/SRAMECC.
- Any: Preference is unspecified. Use conservative settings that can run anywhere.
- Off: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC Off
- On: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC On
GCNSubtarget will track the four options based on the following criteria. If
the subtarget does not support XNACK/SRAMECC we say the setting is
"Unsupported". If no subtarget features for XNACK/SRAMECC are requested we
must support "Any" mode. If the subtarget features XNACK/SRAMECC exist in the
feature string when initializing the subtarget, the settings are "On/Off".
The defaults are updated to be conservatively correct, meaning if no setting
for XNACK or SRAMECC is explicitly requested, defaults will be used which
generate code that can be run anywhere. This corresponds to the "Any" setting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85882
Treat a non-atomic volatile load and store as a relaxed atomic at
system scope for the address spaces accessed. This will ensure all
relevant caches will be bypassed.
A volatile atomic is not changed and still only bypasses caches upto
the level specified by the SyncScope operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94214
Extract the scratch offset from the scratch buffer descriptor that is
stored in the global table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91701
Pseudo-registers allow different register encodings
between gpu generations. Make sure we resolve the
pseudo regs to real regs whenever we get their
hardware encoding.
Using the correct encodings revealed a register
bank conflict and an unnecessary write dependency.
Tests have been updated to match.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90721
Change-Id: I73c154cd24aecc820993b50bebaf4df97a5710ca
The support is disabled by default. So far there is instruction
selection, spilling, and frame elimination. It also changes SP
from unswizzled to swizzled as used by flat scratch instructions,
so it cannot be mixed with MUBUF stack access.
At the very least missing:
- GlobalISel;
- Some optimizations in frame elimination in between vector
and scalar ALU;
- It shall finally allow to always materialize frame index
as an SGPR, but that is not implemented and frame elimination
cannot handle it yet;
- Unaligned and/or multidword flat scratch shall work, but it
is legalized now for MUBUF;
- Operand folding cannot optimize FI like with MUBUF yet;
- It will need scaling the value of the SP/FP in the DWARF
expression to recover the unswizzled scratch address;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89170
Austin Kerbow