This supports things like
(setcc ugt X, 0) -> (setcc ne X, 0)
I've restricted to only make changes to vectors before legalize ops because I doubt all targets have accurate condition code legality information for vectors given how little we did before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42948
llvm-svn: 326495
isCondCodeLegal internally checked Legal or Custom which is misleading. Though no targets set any cond code action to Custom today.
So I've renamed isCondCodeLegal to isCondCodeLegalOrCustom and added a real isCondCodeLegal that only checks Legal.
I've changed legalization code to use isCondCodeLegalOrCustom and left things reachable via DAG combine as isCondCodeLegal. I've also changed some places that called getCondCodeAction and compared to Legal to just use isCondCodeLegal.
I'm looking at trying to keep SETCC all the way to isel for the AVX512 integer comparisons and I suspect I'll need to make some condition codes Custom to stop DAG combine from changing things post LegalizeOps. Prior to this only Expand stopped DAG combine, but that causes LegalizeOps to try to swap operands or invert rather than calling our Custom handler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43607
llvm-svn: 325829
This is split off from D42948 and includes just the cases that constant fold to true or false. It also includes some refactoring to keep predicate checks together.
This supports things like
(setcc uge X, 0) -> true
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43489
llvm-svn: 325627
DAGCombiner and SimplifySetCC both use getPointerTy for shift amounts pre-legalization. DAGCombiner uses a single helper function to hide this. SimplifySetCC does it in multiple places.
This patch adds a defaulted parameter to getShiftAmountTy that can make it return getPointerTy for scalar types. Use this parameter to simplify the SimplifySetCC and DAGCombiner.
Additionally, there were two places in SimplifySetCC that were creating shifts using the target's preferred shift amount pre-legalization. If the target uses a narrow type and the type is illegal, this can cause SimplfiySetCC to create a shift with an amount that can't represent all possible shift values for the type. To fix this we should use pointer type there too.
Alternatively we could make getScalarShiftAmountTy for each target return a safe value for large types as proposed in D43445. And maybe we should still do that, but fixing the SimplifySetCC code keeps other targets from tripping over this in the future.
Fixes PR36250.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43449
llvm-svn: 325602
Based off the DemandedElts mask the and UNDEF elements returned from the SimplifyDemandedVectorElts calls to the shuffle operands, we can attempt to simplify the shuffle mask.
I had to be very conservative here as accepting post-legalized shuffle masks could cause problems for targets that legalize UNDEF mask elements back to inrange values (PowerPC), similarly combining to identity shuffle masks could cause too much UNDEF information to disappear for later combines.
llvm-svn: 325354
This is mainly a move of simplifyShuffleOperands from DAGCombiner::visitVECTOR_SHUFFLE to create a more general purpose TargetLowering::SimplifyDemandedVectorElts implementation.
Further features can be moved/added in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42896
llvm-svn: 325232
This reverses instcombine's demanded bits' transform which always tries to clear bits in constants.
As noted in PR35792 and shown in the test diffs:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35792
...we can do better in codegen by trying to form -1. The x86 sub test shows a missed opportunity.
I did investigate changing instcombine's behavior, but it would be more work to change
canonicalization in IR. Clearing bits / shrinking constants can allow killing instructions,
so we'd have to figure out how to not regress those cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42986
llvm-svn: 324839
SelectionDAG::getBoolConstant was recently introduced. At the time I didn't know getConstTrueVal existed, but I think getBoolConstant is better as it will use the source VT to make sure it can properly detect floating point if it is configured differently.
llvm-svn: 324832
Many in SimplifySetCC and FoldSetCC try to create true or false constants. Some of them query getBooleanContents to figure out whether to use all ones or just 1 for true. But many places do not check and just use 1 without ensuring the VT has an i1 scalar type. Note sure if those places only trigger before type legalization so they only see an i1
type?
To cleanup the inconsistency and reduce some duplicated code, this patch adds a getBoolConstant method to SelectionDAG that takes are of querying getBooleanContents and doing the right thing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43037
llvm-svn: 324634
When handling vectors with non byte-sized elements, reverse the order of the
elements in the built integer if the target is Big-Endian.
SystemZ tests updated.
Review: Eli Friedman, Ulrich Weigand.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42786
llvm-svn: 324063
This was completely broken, but hopefully fixed by this patch.
In cases where it is needed, a vector with non byte-sized elements is stored
by extracting, zero-extending, shift:ing and or:ing the elements into an
integer of the same width as the vector, which is then stored.
Review: Eli Friedman, Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42100#inline-369520https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35520
llvm-svn: 323042
Allow SimplifyDemandedBits to use TargetLoweringOpt::computeKnownBits to look through bitcasts. This can help simplifying in some cases where bitcasts of constants generated during or after legalization can't be folded away, and thus didn't get picked up by SimplifyDemandedBits. This fixes PR34620, where a redundant pand created during legalization from lowering and lshr <16xi8> wasn't being simplified due to the presence of a bitcasted build_vector as an operand.
Committed on the behalf of @sameconrad (Sam Conrad)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41643
llvm-svn: 321969
This seems to improve X86's ability to match this into an address computation. Otherwise the other operand gets assigned to the base register and the stack pointer + frame index ends up in the index register. But index registers can't encode ESP/RSP so we end up having to move it into another register to meet the constraint.
I could try to improve the address matcher in X86, but swapping the producer seemed easier. Several other places already have the operands in this order so this is at least consistent.
llvm-svn: 321370
Two issues found when doing codegen for splitting vector with non-zero alloca addr space:
DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_INSERT_VECTOR_ELT/SplitVecOp_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT uses dummy pointer info for creating
SDStore. Since one pointer operand contains multiply and add, InferPointerInfo is unable to
infer the correct pointer info, which ends up with a dummy pointer info for the target to lower
store and results in isel failure. The fix is to introduce MachinePointerInfo::getUnknownStack to
represent MachinePointerInfo which is known in alloca address space but without other information.
TargetLowering::getVectorElementPointer uses value type of pointer in addr space 0 for
multiplication of index and then add it to the pointer. However the pointer may be in an addr
space which has different size than addr space 0. The fix is to use the pointer value type for
index multiplication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39758
llvm-svn: 319622
The object can't straddle the address space
wrap around, so I think it's OK to assume any
offsets added to the base object pointer can't
overflow. Similar logic already appears to be
applied in SelectionDAGBuilder when lowering
aggregate returns.
llvm-svn: 319272
This is needed for cases when the memory access is not as big as the width of
the data type. For instance, storing i1 (1 bit) would be done in a byte (8
bits).
Using 'BitSize >> 3' (or '/ 8') would e.g. give the memory access of an i1 a
size of 0, which for instance makes alias analysis return NoAlias even when
it shouldn't.
There are no tests as this was done as a follow-up to the bugfix for the case
where this was discovered (r318824). This handles more similar cases.
Review: Björn Petterson
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40339
llvm-svn: 319173
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
Some of the AMDGPU stack addressing modes require knowing the sign
bit is zero. We used to accomplish this by custom lowering
frame indexes, and then putting an AssertZext around a
TargetFrameIndex. This required specifically looking for
the AssextZext + frame index pattern which was moderately
disgusting. The same could probably be accomplished
with a target specific node, but would still
require special handling of frame indexes.
llvm-svn: 317671
Summary:
We shouldn't recurse any further but it doesn't mean we shouldn't be able to give the known bits for a constant. The caller would probably like that we always return the right answer for a constant RHS. This matches what InstCombine does in this case.
I don't have a test case because this showed up while trying to revive D31724.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38967
llvm-svn: 316255
Currently expandUnalignedLoad/Store uses place holder pointer info for temporary memory operand
in stack, which does not have correct address space. This causes unaligned private double16 load/store to be
lowered to flat_load instead of buffer_load for amdgcn target.
This fixes failures of OpenCL conformance test basic/vload_private/vstore_private on target amdgcn---amdgizcl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35361
llvm-svn: 314566
This teach simplifyDemandedBits to handle constant splat vector shifts.
This required changing some uses of getZExtValue to getLimitedValue since we can't rely on legalization using getShiftAmountTy for the shift amount.
I believe there may have been a bug in the ((X << C1) >>u ShAmt) handling where we didn't check if the inner shift was too large. I've fixed that here.
I had to add new patterns to ARM because the zext/sext the patterns were trying to look for got turned into an any_extend with this patch. Happy to split that out too, but not sure how to test without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37665
llvm-svn: 314139
David Blaikie