to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Following up on and complementing D44404 and other sanitizer allocators.
Currently many allocator specific errors (OOM, for example) are reported as
a text message and CHECK(0) termination, no stack, no details, not too
helpful nor informative. To improve the situation, detailed and structured
common errors were defined and reported under the appropriate conditions.
Common tests were generalized a bit to cover a slightly different TSan
stack reporting format, extended to verify errno value and returned
pointer value check is now explicit to facilitate debugging.
Reviewers: dvyukov
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48087
llvm-svn: 334975
Summary:
Providing aligned new/delete implementations to match ASan.
Unlike ASan, MSan and TSan do not perform any additional checks
on overaligned memory, hence no sanitizer specific tests.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: kubamracek, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41532
llvm-svn: 321365
Summary:
Operator new interceptors behavior is now controlled by their nothrow
property as well as by allocator_may_return_null flag value:
- allocator_may_return_null=* + new() - die on allocation error
- allocator_may_return_null=0 + new(nothrow) - die on allocation error
- allocator_may_return_null=1 + new(nothrow) - return null
Ideally new() should throw std::bad_alloc exception, but that is not
trivial to achieve, hence TODO.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34731
llvm-svn: 306604
This patch replaces all uses of __libc_malloc and friends with the internal allocator.
It seems that the only reason why we have calls to __libc_malloc in the first place was the lack of the internal allocator at the time. Using the internal allocator will also make sure that the system allocator is never used (this is the same behavior as ASan), and we don’t have to worry about working with unknown pointers coming from the system allocator.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21025
llvm-svn: 271916
Summary:
Android doesn't have __libc_malloc and related allocation
functions. As its dynamic linker doesn't use malloc, so
we can use REAL(malloc) to replace __libc_malloc safely.
Reviewers: kcc, eugenis, dvyukov
Subscribers: llvm-commits, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15297
llvm-svn: 255167
Summary: I've copy/pasted the LLVM_NOEXCEPT definition macro goo from LLVM's Compiler.h. Is there somewhere I should put this in Compiler RT? Is there a useful header to define/share things like this?
Reviewers: samsonov
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11780
llvm-svn: 244453
Chandler Carruth