to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: ldionne, EricWF
Subscribers: jyknight, christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 351289
We already have a specialization that will use memcpy for construction
of trivial types from an iterator range like
std::vector<int>(int *, int *);
But if we have const-ness mismatch like
std::vector<int>(const int *, const int *);
we would use a slow path that copies each element individually. This change
enables the optimal specialization for const-ness mismatch. Fixes PR37574.
Contributions to the patch are made by Arthur O'Dwyer, Louis Dionne.
rdar://problem/40485845
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, ldionne, scanon
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, ldionne, howard.hinnant, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48342
llvm-svn: 350583
The standard section [array.zero] requires the return value of begin()
and end() methods of a zero-sized array to be unique. Eric Fiselier
clarifies: "That unique value cannot be null, and must be properly aligned".
This patch adds checks for the first part of this clarification: unique
value returned by these methods cannot be null.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D55366.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 348509
The section array.zero says: "The return value of data() is unspecified".
This patch marks all checks of the array<T, 0>.data() return value as
libc++ specific.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D55364.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 348485
This reverts commit 087f065cb0c7463f521a62599884493aaee2ea12.
The tests were failing on 32 bit builds, and I don't have time
to clean them up right now. I'll recommit tomorrow with fixed tests.
llvm-svn: 347816
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 347787
The iterator types for different specializations of containers with the
same element type but different allocators are not required to be
convertible. This patch makes the test to take the iterator type from
the same container specialization as the created container.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54806.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347423
Some tests use type std::max_align_t, but don't include <cstddef> header
directly. As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant
libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54645.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347232
This was implicitly converting [1, 3] to bool, which triggers
an MSVC warning. The test should just pass `true`, which is
simpler, has the same behavior, and avoids the warning. (This
is a library test, not a compiler test, and the conversion happens
before calling `push_back`, so passing [1, 3] isn't interesting
in any way. This resembles a previous change to stop passing
`1 == 1` in the `vector<bool>` tests.)
llvm-svn: 346910
C++2a[container.requirements.general]p8 states that when move constructing
a container, the allocator is move constructed. Vector previously copy
constructed these allocators. This patch fixes that bug.
Additionally it cleans up some unnecessary allocator conversions
when copy constructing containers. Libc++ uses
__internal_allocator_traits::select_on_copy_construction to select
the correct allocator during copy construction, but it unnecessarily
converted the resulting allocator to the user specified allocator
type and back. After this patch list and forward_list no longer
do that.
Technically we're supposed to be using allocator_traits<allocator_type>::select_on_copy_construction,
but that should seemingly be addressed as a separate patch, if at all.
llvm-svn: 334053
An array T[1] isn't necessarily the same say when it's
a member of a struct. This patch addresses that problem and corrects
the tests to deal with it.
llvm-svn: 324545
Summary:
This patch fixes llvm.org/PR35491 and LWG2157 (https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue2157)
The fix attempts to maintain ABI compatibility by replacing the array with a instance of `aligned_storage`.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: lichray, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41223
llvm-svn: 324526
Revert "Fix initialization of array<const T, 0> with GCC."
Revert "Make array<const T, 0> non-CopyAssignable and make swap and fill ill-formed."
This reverts commit r324182, r324185, and r324194 which were causing issues with zero-length std::arrays.
llvm-svn: 324309
The standard isn't exactly clear how std::array should handle zero-sized arrays
with const element types. In particular W.R.T. copy assignment, swap, and fill.
This patch takes the position that those operations should be ill-formed,
and makes changes to libc++ to make it so.
This follows up on commit r324182.
llvm-svn: 324185
Summary:
This patch fixes llvm.org/PR35491 and LWG2157 (https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue2157)
The fix attempts to maintain ABI compatibility by replacing the array with a instance of `aligned_storage`.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: lichray, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41223
llvm-svn: 324182
In a17cd7c641c34b6c4bd4845a4d4fb590cb6c238c Marshall added assert(true) to the vector<bool>::size tests, which break on C1XX:
D:\Contest\gl0qojfu.5pe\src\qa\vc\libs\libcxx\upstream\test\std\containers\sequences\vector.bool\size.pass.cpp(62): error C2220: warning treated as error - no 'object' file generated
d:\contest\gl0qojfu.5pe\src\qa\vc\libs\libcxx\upstream\test\std\containers\sequences\vector.bool\size.pass.cpp(33) : warning C6326: Potential comparison of a constant with another constant.
d:\contest\gl0qojfu.5pe\src\qa\vc\libs\libcxx\upstream\test\std\containers\sequences\vector.bool\size.pass.cpp(52) : warning C6326: Potential comparison of a constant with another constant.
The corresponding test for vector::size asserts assert(c.size() == 3);, so I changed it to do that here.
llvm-svn: 318812
Marshall Clow