to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
When built against the old libc++ version the test was causing linker error
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::pmr::new_delete_resource()", referenced from:
void test_evil<WidgetV0, WidgetV0>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV0, WidgetV1>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV0, WidgetV2>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV0, WidgetV3>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV1, WidgetV0>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV1, WidgetV1>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV1, WidgetV2>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
...
llvm-svn: 334431
Patch from Arthur O'Dwyer.
In the TS, `uses_allocator` construction for `pair` tried to use an allocator
type of `memory_resource*`, which is incorrect because `memory_resource*` is
not an allocator type. LWG 2969 fixed it to use `polymorphic_allocator` as the
allocator type instead.
https://wg21.link/lwg2969
(D47090 included this in `<memory_resource>`; at Eric's request, I've split
this out into its own patch applied to the existing
`<experimental/memory_resource>` instead.)
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D47109
llvm-svn: 333384
Summary:
I haven't added it to all the tests, just those that fail without it
(those that aren't header only).
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21247
llvm-svn: 272443
Chandler Carruth