to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
When using an old version of glibc, a ::isinf(double) and ::isnan(double)
function is provided, rather than just the macro required by C and C++.
Displace this function using _LIBCPP_PREFERRED_OVERLOAD where possible.
The only remaining case where we should get the wrong return type is now
glibc + libc++ + a non-clang compiler.
llvm-svn: 331241
For std::isinf, the standard requires effectively calling isinf as
double from Libc for integral types. But integral types are never
infinite; we don't need to call Libc to return false.
Also short-circuit other functions where Libc won't have interesting
answers: signbit, fpclassify, isfinite, isnan, and isnormal.
I added correctness tests for integral types since we're no longer
deferring to Libc.
In review it was pointed out that in future revisions of the C++
standard we may add more types to std::is_arithmetic (e.g.,
std::is_fixed_point). I'll leave it to a future commit to hack this to
allow using math functions on those. We'll need to change things like
__libcpp_fpclassify anyway, so I'm not sure anything here would really
be future-proof.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31561
rdar://problem/31361223
llvm-svn: 301060
Summary:
GLIBC recently removed the incorrect `int isinf(double)` and `int isnan(double)` overloads in C++11 and greater. This causes previously `XFAIL: linux` tests to start passing.
Since there is no longer a way to 'XFAIL' the tests I choose to simply tolerate this bug.
See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19439
Reviewers: rsmith, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19835
llvm-svn: 271060
Chandler Carruth