to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
This patch fixes almost all currently failing tests when
using GCC ToT.
The specific changes are:
(A) Workaround gcc.gnu.org/PR83921 which rejects variables w/o initializers
in constexpr contexts -- even when the variable is an empty class. This
bug has been worked around at all callsites by adding an initializer.
Additionally a new test, constexpr_init.pass.cpp, has been added to
test that Clang doesn't suffer from these bugs.
(B) Fix streambuf.assign/swap.pass.cpp. This test was never actually
calling the swap method as intended. In fact, the swap function it
intended to call was ill-formed when instantiated. GCC diagnosed
this ill-formedness w/o needing an instantiation.
(C) size_delete11.pass.cpp was fixed by adding c++2a to the list of
unsupported dialects.
llvm-svn: 322810
This improves readability and (theoretically) improves portability,
as _Ugly names are reserved.
This performs additional de-uglification, so all of these tests
follow the example of iterator.traits/empty.pass.cpp.
llvm-svn: 310761
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
// Do test.
#else
// Empty test.
#endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.
Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730
llvm-svn: 271108
Chandler Carruth