The meta-programming that attempted to form the invoke call expression
was not in a SFINAE context. This made it a hard error to provide
non-referencable types like 'void' or 'void (...) const'.
This patch fixes the error by checking the validity of the call
expression within a SFINAE context.
llvm-svn: 352522
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: ldionne, EricWF
Subscribers: jyknight, christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 351289
This reverts commit 087f065cb0c7463f521a62599884493aaee2ea12.
The tests were failing on 32 bit builds, and I don't have time
to clean them up right now. I'll recommit tomorrow with fixed tests.
llvm-svn: 347816
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 347787
* Remove unused type from is_assignable.pass.cpp
* Don't specialize `common_type<::X<float>>` in common_type.pass.cpp, which violates the requirements of [meta.trans.other]/5
llvm-svn: 336618
Checking for complete types is really rather tricky when you consider
the amount of specializations required to check a function type. This
specifically caused PR37407 where we incorrectly diagnosed
noexcept function types as incomplete (but there were plenty of other
cases that would cause this).
This patch removes the complete type checking for now. I'm going
to look into adding a clang builtin to correctly do this for us.
llvm-svn: 332040
Clang previously reported an empty union as having a unique object
representation. This was incorrect and was fixed in a recent Clang commit.
This patch fixes the libc++ tests.
llvm-svn: 324153
Summary:
After rL319736 for D28253 (which fixes PR28929), gcc cannot compile `<memory>` anymore in pre-C+11 modes, complaining:
```
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory: In static member function 'static std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp>::make_shared(_A0&, _A1&, _A2&)':
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4365:5: error: wrong number of template arguments (4, should be at least 1)
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in make_shared" );
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:649:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:3198:29: note: provided for 'template<class _Tp, class _A0, class _A1> struct std::__1::is_constructible'
struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS is_constructible
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4365:5: error: template argument 1 is invalid
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in make_shared" );
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory: In static member function 'static std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp> std::__1::shared_ptr<_Tp>::allocate_shared(const _Alloc&, _A0&, _A1&, _A2&)':
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4444:5: error: wrong number of template arguments (4, should be at least 1)
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in allocate_shared" );
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:649:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/type_traits:3198:29: note: provided for 'template<class _Tp, class _A0, class _A1> struct std::__1::is_constructible'
struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS is_constructible
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:648:0,
from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:4444:5: error: template argument 1 is invalid
static_assert((is_constructible<_Tp, _A0, _A1, _A2>::value), "Can't construct object in allocate_shared" );
^
```
This is also reported in https://bugs.freebsd.org/224946 (FreeBSD is apparently one of the very few projects that regularly builds programs against libc++ with gcc).
The reason is that the static assertions are invoking `is_constructible` with three arguments, while gcc does not have the built-in `is_constructible` feature, and the pre-C++11 `is_constructible` wrappers in `<type_traits>` only provide up to two arguments.
I have added additional wrappers for three arguments, modified the `is_constructible` entry point to take three arguments instead, and added a simple test to is_constructible.pass.cpp.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: krytarowski, cfe-commits, emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41805
llvm-svn: 321963
Summary:
Introduce a new form of `result_of` without function type encoding.
Rename and split `is_callable/is_nothrow_callable` into `is_invocable/is_nothrow_invocable/is_invocable_r/is_nothrow_invocable_r` (and associated types accordingly)
Change function type encoding of previous `is_callable/is_nothrow_callable` traits to conventional template type parameter lists.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, bebuch
Reviewed By: EricWF, bebuch
Subscribers: lichray, bebuch, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38831
llvm-svn: 320509
This patch cleans up a number of issues reported by STL, including:
1) Fix duplicate is_convertible test.
2) Move non-standard reference_wrapper tests under test/libcxx
3) Fix assumption that sizeof(wchar_t) == 32 in the codecvt and
wstring_convert tests.
llvm-svn: 302870
Clang 5.0 implements these changes here: 87cd035326
MSVC++ will implement these changes in the first toolset update to 2017.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33021
llvm-svn: 302710
On Windows the function template `template <class T> void test()` has
the same mangled name when instantiated with the distinct types `void()`
and `void() noexcept`. When this occurs Clang emits an error. This error
was causing two type-traits tests to fail.
However this can be worked around by using class templates instead of
function templates, which is what this patch does to fix the errors.
llvm-svn: 302380
This patch fixes llvm.org/PR32097 by using the __is_abstract
builtin type-trait instead of the previous library-only implementation.
All supported compilers provide this trait. I've tested as far
back as Clang 3.2, GCC 4.6 and MSVC trunk.
llvm-svn: 296561
When compiled with Clang for Windows, this was emitting "enumerator value
evaluates to 4294967295, which cannot be narrowed to type 'int' [-Wc++11-narrowing]".
The test should more strenuously avoid poking this ABI deficiency (and it
already has coverage for explicitly specified underlying types).
Fixes D29140.
llvm-svn: 294159
test/std/strings/string.classes/typedefs.pass.cpp
Actually test what basic_string's typedefs stand for.
test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/result_of11.pass.cpp
NotDerived and ND were completely unused.
test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.pair/default.pass.cpp
P2 was mistakenly not being used. Yes, that's
right: -Wunused-local-typedef CAUGHT A MISTAKE! AMAZING!
Fixes D29137.
llvm-svn: 294156
This is the subject of an active NB comment. Regardless of what the Working
Paper currently says, asking this question is morally wrong, because the
answer can change when the type is completed. C1XX now detects such
precondition violations and complains about them; perhaps Clang should too.
Fixes D28591.
llvm-svn: 292281
Eric Fiselier