That test doesn't fail anymore since r349378, since the assertions that
r349378 removed must have been bugs in the dylib at some point.
llvm-svn: 349484
Add a target_info definition for NetBSD. The definition is based
on the one used by FreeBSD, with libcxxrt replaced by libc++abi,
and using llvm-libunwind since we need to use its unwinder
implementation to build anyway.
Additionally, XFAIL the 30 tests that fail because of non-implemented
locale features. According to the manual, NetBSD implements only
LC_CTYPE part of locale handling. However, there is a locale database
in the system and locale specifications are validated against it,
so it makes sense to list the common locales as supported.
If I'm counting correctly, this change enables additional 43 passing
tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55767
llvm-svn: 349379
Remove the two test cases for \xDA and \xFA with UTF-8 locale, as both
characters alone are invalid in UTF-8 (short sequences). Upon removing
them, the test passes on Linux again (and also on NetBSD, after adding
appropriate locale configuration).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55746
llvm-svn: 349378
Explicitly disable the -Wformat-zero-length diagnostic when running
ctime tests, since one of the test cases passes zero-length format
string to strftime(). When strftime() is appropriately decorated
with __attribute__(format, ...), this caused the test to fail because
of this warning (e.g. on NetBSD).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55661
llvm-svn: 349294
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
This is a re-application of r348824, which broke the build in C++03 mode
because a test was marked as supported in C++03 when it shouldn't be.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348847
Summary:
std::tuple marks its constructors as noexcept when the corresponding
memberwise constructors are noexcept too -- this commit improves std::pair
so that it behaves the same.
Note:
I did not add support in the explicit and non-explicit `pair(_Tuple&& __p)`
constructors because those are non-standard extensions, and supporting them
properly is tedious (we have to copy the rvalue-referenceness of the deduced
_Tuple&& onto the result of tuple_element).
<rdar://problem/29537079>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48669
llvm-svn: 348824
The tests were marked to fail based on the 'availability' LIT feature.
However, those tests should really only be failing when we run them
against the dylibs that were deployed on macosx10.7 and macosx10.8,
which the deployment target has nothing to do with.
This caused the tests to unexpectedly pass when running the tests
with deployment target macosx10.{7,8} but running with a recent dylib.
llvm-svn: 348520
The standard section [array.zero] requires the return value of begin()
and end() methods of a zero-sized array to be unique. Eric Fiselier
clarifies: "That unique value cannot be null, and must be properly aligned".
This patch adds checks for the first part of this clarification: unique
value returned by these methods cannot be null.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D55366.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 348509
The section array.zero says: "The return value of data() is unspecified".
This patch marks all checks of the array<T, 0>.data() return value as
libc++ specific.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D55364.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 348485
Whether an explicit instantiation declaration should be provided is not
a matter of availability markup.
This problem is exemplified by the fact that some tests were incorrectly
marked as XFAIL when they should instead have been using the definition
of streams from the headers, and hence passing, and that, regardless of
whether visibility annotations are enabled.
llvm-svn: 348436
Summary:
This was voted into C++20 in San Diego. Note that there was a revision
D0318R2 which did include unwrap_reference_t, but we mistakingly voted
P0318R1 into the C++20 Working Draft (which does not include
unwrap_reference_t). This patch implements D0318R2, which is what
we'll end up with in the Working Draft once this mistake has been
fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54485
llvm-svn: 348138
The test was previously marked as unsupported on all Apple platforms, when
we really just want to mark it as unsupported for previously shipped dylibs
on macosx.
llvm-svn: 347920
This reverts commit 087f065cb0c7463f521a62599884493aaee2ea12.
The tests were failing on 32 bit builds, and I don't have time
to clean them up right now. I'll recommit tomorrow with fixed tests.
llvm-svn: 347816
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 347787
In r339743, I marked several aligned allocation tests as downright
unsupported on macosx in an attempt to unbreak the build. It turns
out that marking them as unuspported whenever we're on OS X is way
too coarse grained. This commit marks the tests as XFAIL with more
granularity.
llvm-svn: 347585
Summary:
In PR39232, we noticed that some variant tests started failing in C++2a mode
with recent Clangs, because the rules for literal types changed in C++2a. As
a result, a temporary fix was checked in (enabling the test only in C++17).
This commit is what I believe should be the long term fix: I removed the
tests that checked constexpr default-constructibility with a weird type
from the tests for index() and valueless_by_exception(), and instead I
added tests for those using an obviously literal type in the test for the
default constructor.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, libcxx-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54767
llvm-svn: 347568
This is a revert of r347421, except I'm using the with_system_cxx_lib
lit feature instead of availability to mark the test as unsupported
(because the problem is a bug in the dylib itself). In r347421, I said
I wasn't able to reproduce the issue and that's why I was removing it:
this was because I ran lit slightly wrong. The problem mentioned really
exists.
llvm-svn: 347475
The iterator types for different specializations of containers with the
same element type but different allocators are not required to be
convertible. This patch makes the test to take the iterator type from
the same container specialization as the created container.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54806.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347423
I wasn't able to reproduce the issue referred to by the comment using
the libc++'s shipped with mac OS X 10.7 and 10.8, so I assume this may
have been fixed in a function that is now shipped in the headers. In
that case, the tests will pass no matter what dylib we're using.
In the worst case, some test bots will start failing and I'll understand
why I was wrong, and I can create an actual lit feature for it. Note
that I could just leave this test alone, but this change is on the path
towards eradicating vendor-specific availability markup from the test
suite.
llvm-svn: 347421
The XFAIL started passing since we're only testing for trivial-copyability of
reference_wrapper in C++14 and above. This commit constrains the XFAIL to
gcc-4.9 with C++14 (it would also fail on C++17 and above, but those standards
are not available with GCC 4.9).
llvm-svn: 347264
Some tests use type std::max_align_t, but don't include <cstddef> header
directly. As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant
libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54645.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347232
A bunch of unordered containers tests call library functions but don't directly
include the corresponding header files:
- fabs() (defined in <cmath> which is not included);
- is_permutation() (defined in <algorithm> which is not included);
- next() (defined in <iterator> which is not included).
- As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54643.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347085
This was implicitly converting [1, 3] to bool, which triggers
an MSVC warning. The test should just pass `true`, which is
simpler, has the same behavior, and avoids the warning. (This
is a library test, not a compiler test, and the conversion happens
before calling `push_back`, so passing [1, 3] isn't interesting
in any way. This resembles a previous change to stop passing
`1 == 1` in the `vector<bool>` tests.)
llvm-svn: 346910
Summary:
P1006 adds support for constexpr in the specialization of pointer_traits
for raw pointers. This is necessary in order to use pointer_traits in
the upcoming constexpr containers. We expect P1006 to be voted into the
working draft for C++20 at the San Diego meeting.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53867
llvm-svn: 346764
This patch adds tests to ensure that multiset/unordered_multiset's emplace
method correctly constructs the elements without any intervening
constructions.
llvm-svn: 346743
This commit adds a merge member function to all the map and set containers,
which splices nodes from the source container. This completes support for
P0083r3.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48896
llvm-svn: 345744
Summary:
Some tests (mainly the new C++20 calendar library) fail when libc++ is
tested with '--param=std=c++98'. The failures happen because the tests
actually don't support C++98, but don't mention C++98 in the
'UNSUPPORTED:' line.
This change fixes the issue.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: arphaman, michaelplatings, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53640
llvm-svn: 345148
The test is trying to avoid saying aligned_alloc on Windows' UCRT, which does not (and can not) implement aligned_alloc. However, it's testing for c1xx, meaning clang on Windows will fail this test when using the UCRT.
llvm-svn: 344829
In this example, the ctor of G runs in the main thread in the expression G(), and also in the copy ctor of G() in the DECAY_COPY inside std::thread. The main thread destroys the G() instance at the semicolon, and the started thread destroys the G() after it returns. Thus there is a race between the threads on the n_alive variable.
The fix is to join with the background thread before attempting to destroy the G in the main thread.
llvm-svn: 344820
Revert r344535 "Wrap up the new chrono literals in an #ifdef..."
Revert r344546 "Mark a couple of test cases as 'C++17-only'..."
Some of the buildbot failures were masked by another error,
and this one was probably missed.
llvm-svn: 344580
PR38682 added a test to check for a race condition in std::future.
Part of the fix is part of the dylib, but there is no released version
of mac OS X that ships a dylib containing the fix. Hence, this test can
(and sometimes does) when testing on OS X. This commit marks the test
as unsupported to avoid spurious failures.
llvm-svn: 344053
Debian build bots are running Clang 4, which apparently does not support
the "deprecated" attribute properly. Clang pretends to support the attribute,
but the attribute doesn't do anything.
(live example: https://wandbox.org/permlink/0De69aXns0t1D59r)
On a separate note, I'm not sure I understand why we're even running the
libc++ tests under Clang-4. Is this a configuration we support? I can
understand that libc++ should _build_ with Clang 4, but it's not clear
to me that new libc++ headers should be usable under older compilers
like that.
llvm-svn: 342854
Summary:
These deprecation warnings are opt-in: they are only enabled when the
_LIBCXX_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS macro is defined, which is not the case
by default. Note that this is a first step in the right direction, but
I wasn't able to get an exhaustive list of all deprecated components
per standard, so there's certainly stuff that's missing. The list of
components this commit marks as deprecated is:
in C++11:
- auto_ptr, auto_ptr_ref
- binder1st, binder2nd, bind1st(), bind2nd()
- pointer_to_unary_function, pointer_to_binary_function, ptr_fun()
- mem_fun_t, mem_fun1_t, const_mem_fun_t, const_mem_fun1_t, mem_fun()
- mem_fun_ref_t, mem_fun1_ref_t, const_mem_fun_ref_t, const_mem_fun1_ref_t, mem_fun_ref()
in C++14:
- random_shuffle()
in C++17:
- unary_negate, binary_negate, not1(), not2()
<rdar://problem/18168350>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48912
llvm-svn: 342843
One of the SIMD tests attempted to left shift a value by 42, which
is UB when the left hand side is a 32 bit integer type.
This patch adjusts the test to use the value 4 instead of 42.
llvm-svn: 342820
This reverts r342566 as it causes on bots linker errors like
> Undefined symbols for architecture i386:
> "std::__1::basic_ostream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >::operator<<(std::nullptr_t)", referenced from:
llvm-svn: 342599
Marshall Clow