This reverts r345525. I'm reverting because that patch apparently caused
a regression on certain platforms (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D53994).
Since we don't fully understand the reasons for the regression, I'm
reverting until we can provide a fix we understand.
llvm-svn: 345893
This commit adds a merge member function to all the map and set containers,
which splices nodes from the source container. This completes support for
P0083r3.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48896
llvm-svn: 345744
The types/comparators passed to std::upper_bound and std::lower_bound
are not required to provided to provide an operator</comp(...) which
accepts the arguments in reverse order. Nor are the ranges required
to have a strict weak ordering.
However, in debug mode we attempted to check the result of a comparison
with the arguments reversed, which may not compiler.
This patch removes the use of the debug comparator for upper_bound
and lower_bound.
equal_range et al still use debug comparators when they call
__upper_bound and __lower_bound.
See llvm.org/PR39458
llvm-svn: 345434
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345281
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345214
This reverts commits r333103 and r333108. _Float16 and __fp16 are C11
extensions and compilers other than Clang don't define these for C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53670
llvm-svn: 345199
Summary:
Some tests (mainly the new C++20 calendar library) fail when libc++ is
tested with '--param=std=c++98'. The failures happen because the tests
actually don't support C++98, but don't mention C++98 in the
'UNSUPPORTED:' line.
This change fixes the issue.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: arphaman, michaelplatings, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53640
llvm-svn: 345148
The test is trying to avoid saying aligned_alloc on Windows' UCRT, which does not (and can not) implement aligned_alloc. However, it's testing for c1xx, meaning clang on Windows will fail this test when using the UCRT.
llvm-svn: 344829
In this example, the ctor of G runs in the main thread in the expression G(), and also in the copy ctor of G() in the DECAY_COPY inside std::thread. The main thread destroys the G() instance at the semicolon, and the started thread destroys the G() after it returns. Thus there is a race between the threads on the n_alive variable.
The fix is to join with the background thread before attempting to destroy the G in the main thread.
llvm-svn: 344820
Revert r344535 "Wrap up the new chrono literals in an #ifdef..."
Revert r344546 "Mark a couple of test cases as 'C++17-only'..."
Some of the buildbot failures were masked by another error,
and this one was probably missed.
llvm-svn: 344580
While __cplusplus was only used a few dozen times, TEST_STD_VAR is used
more than 2000 times. So we replace the former by the latter for
consistency in the tests. There should be no functional change.
llvm-svn: 344194
Summary:
Scoped capabilities need to be annotated as such, otherwise the thread
safety analysis won't work as intended.
Fixes PR39234.
Reviewers: ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53049
llvm-svn: 344096
PR38682 added a test to check for a race condition in std::future.
Part of the fix is part of the dylib, but there is no released version
of mac OS X that ships a dylib containing the fix. Hence, this test can
(and sometimes does) when testing on OS X. This commit marks the test
as unsupported to avoid spurious failures.
llvm-svn: 344053
Debian build bots are running Clang 4, which apparently does not support
the "deprecated" attribute properly. Clang pretends to support the attribute,
but the attribute doesn't do anything.
(live example: https://wandbox.org/permlink/0De69aXns0t1D59r)
On a separate note, I'm not sure I understand why we're even running the
libc++ tests under Clang-4. Is this a configuration we support? I can
understand that libc++ should _build_ with Clang 4, but it's not clear
to me that new libc++ headers should be usable under older compilers
like that.
llvm-svn: 342854
Summary:
These deprecation warnings are opt-in: they are only enabled when the
_LIBCXX_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS macro is defined, which is not the case
by default. Note that this is a first step in the right direction, but
I wasn't able to get an exhaustive list of all deprecated components
per standard, so there's certainly stuff that's missing. The list of
components this commit marks as deprecated is:
in C++11:
- auto_ptr, auto_ptr_ref
- binder1st, binder2nd, bind1st(), bind2nd()
- pointer_to_unary_function, pointer_to_binary_function, ptr_fun()
- mem_fun_t, mem_fun1_t, const_mem_fun_t, const_mem_fun1_t, mem_fun()
- mem_fun_ref_t, mem_fun1_ref_t, const_mem_fun_ref_t, const_mem_fun1_ref_t, mem_fun_ref()
in C++14:
- random_shuffle()
in C++17:
- unary_negate, binary_negate, not1(), not2()
<rdar://problem/18168350>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48912
llvm-svn: 342843
One of the SIMD tests attempted to left shift a value by 42, which
is UB when the left hand side is a 32 bit integer type.
This patch adjusts the test to use the value 4 instead of 42.
llvm-svn: 342820
In rL342814, i have committed a blind fix to unbreak the asan buildbot,
but as it was later discussed, the leak is intentional,
so we can not fix the failure that way.
So this reverts the leak 'fix',
and simply disables the test in the presence of ASAN.
llvm-svn: 342819
Summary:
The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where
function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the
C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`.
However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17.
Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more
liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`.
For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The
extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended
applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms:
1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the
standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one.
2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion,
applied to entities never declared as such by the standard.
Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using
additional macros.
Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer
dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For
example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`.
Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled
by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`.
This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev),
then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF
Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179
llvm-svn: 342808
This reverts r342566 as it causes on bots linker errors like
> Undefined symbols for architecture i386:
> "std::__1::basic_ostream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >::operator<<(std::nullptr_t)", referenced from:
llvm-svn: 342599
type.
Libc++ correctly asserts that a set of visitors for a variant all
return the same type. However, we use the visitation machinary to
perform relational operations. This causes a static assertion when
some of the alternatives relops return a UDT which is implicitly
convertible to bool instead of 'bool' exactly.
llvm-svn: 342560
Summary:
This commit fixes a regression introduced in r316095, where we don't match
inverted character classes when there's no negated characrers in the []'s.
rdar://problem/43060054
Reviewers: mclow.lists, timshen, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50534
llvm-svn: 340609
Summary:
The state associated to the future was set in one thread (with synchronization)
but read in another thread without synchronization, which led to a data race.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38181
rdar://problem/42548261
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51170
llvm-svn: 340608
It looks like this test XPASSes when the deployment target is older than
the OS of the system the test is running on. It looks like we run the
tests with -mmacosx-version-min=10.12, and that makes the test expect to
fail, but it passes.
llvm-svn: 340427
These algorithms require a ForwardIterator or better. Ensure
we diagnose the contract violation at compile time instead of
of silently doing the wrong thing.
Further algorithms will be audited in upcoming patches.
llvm-svn: 340426
Summary:
When a seed sequence would lead to having no non-zero significant bits
in the initial state of a `mersenne_twister_engine`, the fallback is to
flip the most significant bit of the first value that appears in the
textual representation of the initial state.
rand.eng.mers describes this as setting the value to be 2 to the power
of one less than w; the previous value encoded in the implementation,
namely one less than "2 to the power of w", is replaced by the correct
value in this patch.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, jasonliu
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: mclow.lists, jasonliu, EricWF, christof, ldionne, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50736
llvm-svn: 339969
Because FreeBSD uses _M in its <sys/types.h>, and it is hard to avoid
including that header, only define _M to NASTY_MACRO for other operating
systems. This fixes almost 2000 unexpected test failures.
Discussed with Eric Fiselier.
llvm-svn: 339794
Summary:
Since r338934, Clang emits an error when aligned allocation functions are
used in conjunction with a system libc++ dylib that does not support those
functions. This causes some tests to fail when testing against older libc++
dylibs. This commit marks those tests as UNSUPPORTED, and also documents the
various reasons for the tests being unsupported.
Reviewers: vsapsai, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, mclow.lists, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50341
llvm-svn: 339743
Summary:
Those tests are breaking the test bots. A Bugzilla has been filed to
make sure those tests are re-enabled: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38572
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: krytarowski, christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50748
llvm-svn: 339742
Summary:
The macro was not defined in C++11 mode when it should have been, at least
according to how _LIBCPP_HAS_C11_FEATURES is defined.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, jfb, dexonsmith
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50719
llvm-svn: 339702
Summary:
These #includes are quite important, since otherwise any
#if TEST_STD_VER > 14 && defined(TEST_HAS_C11_FEATURES)
checks are always false, and so we don't actually test for C11 support
in the standard library.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50674
llvm-svn: 339675
Summary:
The current code enables aligned allocation functions when compiling in C++17
and later. This is a problem because aligned allocation functions might not
be supported on the target platform, which leads to an error at link time.
Since r338934, Clang knows not to define __cpp_aligned_new when it's not
available on the target platform -- this commit takes advantage of that to
only use aligned allocation functions when they are available.
Reviewers: vsapsai, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, EricWF, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50344
llvm-svn: 339431
(Still pending review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D47400 which has been open since may; will ask for forgiveness rather than permission :) )
llvm-svn: 339214
I'm not sure if libcxx is asserting UTF-8 here; but on Windows the full char value is always passed through in its entirety, since the default codepage is something like Windows-1252. The replacement character is only used for non-chars there; and that should be a more portable test everywhere.
(Still pending review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D47395 which has been open since may; will ask for forgiveness rather than permission :) )
llvm-svn: 339213
Summary:
Major QoI considerations:
- The facility is backported to C++14, same as libstdc++.
- Efforts have been made to minimize the header dependencies.
- The design is friendly to the uses of MSVC intrinsics (`__emulu`, `_umul128`, `_BitScanForward`, `_BitScanForward64`) but not implemented; future contributions are welcome.
Thanks to Milo Yip for contributing the implementation of `__u64toa` and `__u32toa`.
References:
https://wg21.link/p0067r5https://wg21.link/p0682r1
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: ldionne, Quuxplusone, christof, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41458
llvm-svn: 338479
This commit adds a node handle type, (located in __node_handle), and adds
extract() and insert() members to all map and set types, as well as their
implementations in __tree and __hash_table.
The second half of this feature is adding merge() members, which splice nodes
in bulk from one container into another. This will be committed in a follow-up.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46845
llvm-svn: 338472
Summary:
This patch adds a new macro _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VECTOR_EXTENSION for detecting
whether a vector extension (\_\_attribute\_\_((vector_size(num_bytes)))) is
available.
On the top of that, this patch implements the following API:
* all constructors
* operator[]
* copy_from
* copy_to
It also defines simd_abi::native to use vector extension, if available.
In GCC and Clang, certain values with vector extension are passed by registers,
instead of memory.
Based on D41148.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, MaskRay, lichray, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41376
llvm-svn: 338309
The bots were failing to build the cxx_filesystem target, so the
tests were failing. Though this does lead me to wonder how it
was ever working with c++experimental.
llvm-svn: 338095
This patch implements the <filesystem> header and uses that
to provide <experimental/filesystem>.
Unlike other standard headers, the symbols needed for <filesystem>
have not yet been placed in libc++.so. Instead they live in the
new libc++fs.a library. Users of filesystem are required to link this
library. (Also note that libc++experimental no longer contains the
definition of <experimental/filesystem>, which now requires linking libc++fs).
The reason for keeping <filesystem> out of the dylib for now is that
it's still somewhat experimental, and the possibility of requiring an
ABI breaking change is very real. In the future the symbols will likely
be moved into the dylib, or the dylib will be made to link libc++fs automagically).
Note that moving the symbols out of libc++experimental may break user builds
until they update to -lc++fs. This should be OK, because the experimental
library provides no stability guarantees. However, I plan on looking into
ways we can force libc++experimental to automagically link libc++fs.
In order to use a single implementation and set of tests for <filesystem>, it
has been placed in a special `__fs` namespace. This namespace is inline in
C++17 onward, but not before that. As such implementation is available
in C++11 onward, but no filesystem namespace is present "directly", and
as such name conflicts shouldn't occur in C++11 or C++14.
llvm-svn: 338093
Summary:
The ``file_time_type`` time point is used to represent the write times for files.
Its job is to act as part of a C++ wrapper for less ideal system interfaces. The
underlying filesystem uses the ``timespec`` struct for the same purpose.
However, the initial implementation of ``file_time_type`` could not represent
either the range or resolution of ``timespec``, making it unsuitable. Fixing
this requires an implementation which uses more than 64 bits to store the
time point.
I primarily considered two solutions: Using ``__int128_t`` and using a
arithmetic emulation of ``timespec``. Each has its pros and cons, and both
come with more than one complication.
However, after a lot of consideration, I decided on using `__int128_t`. This patch implements that change.
Please see the [FileTimeType Design Document](http://libcxx.llvm.org/docs/DesignDocs/FileTimeType.html) for more information.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne, joerg, arthur.j.odwyer, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, K-ballo, cfe-commits, BillyONeal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49774
llvm-svn: 337960
Tuple has tests that ensure we diagnose non-lifetime extended
reference bindings inside tuples constructors. As of yesterday,
Clang now does this for us.
Adjust the test to tolerate the new diagnostics, while still
testing that we emit diagnostics of our own. Maybe after this
version of Clang has been adopted by most users we should
remove our diagnostics; but for now more error detection is
better!
llvm-svn: 337905
Libc++ was incorrectly reporting an error when the target of create_directory
already exists, but was not a directory. This behavior is not specified
in the most recent standard, which says no error should be reported.
Additionally, libc++ failed to report an error when the attribute directory
path didn't exist or didn't name a directory. This has been fixed as well.
Although it's not clear if we should call status or symlink_status on the
attribute directory. This patch chooses to still call status.
llvm-svn: 337888
Previously the <experimental/filesystem> didn't guard its
contents in any dialect. However, the implementation implicitly
requires at least C++11, and the tests have always been marked
unsupported in C++03. This patch puts a header guard around the
contents to avoid exposing them before C++11.
Additionally, it replaces all of the usages of _NOEXCEPT or
_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR with the keyword directly, since we can
expect the compiler to implement those by now.
llvm-svn: 337884
Summary:
This is not guaranteed to work since the characters after '__has_include('
have special lexing rules that can't possibly be applied when
__has_include is generated by a macro. It also breaks the crash reproducers
generated by -frewrite-includes (see https://llvm.org/pr37990).
Reviewers: EricWF, rsmith, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49067
llvm-svn: 337824
When adding the new tests for the filesystem_error::what method,
I incorrectly removed a test case and replaced it with something else.
This patch restores that test case
llvm-svn: 337764
This patch implements the `what()` for filesystem errors. The message
includes the 'what_arg', any paths that were specified, and the
error code message.
Additionally this patch refactors how errors are created, making it easier
to report them correctly.
llvm-svn: 337664
This patch improves both the performance, and the safety of the
copy_file implementation.
The performance improvements are achieved by using sendfile on
Linux and copyfile on OS X when available.
The TOCTOU hardening is achieved by opening the source and
destination files and then using fstat to check their attributes to
see if we can copy them.
Unfortunately for the destination file, there is no way to open
it without accidentally creating it, so we first have to use
stat to determine if it exists, and if we should copy to it.
Then, once we're sure we should try to copy, we open the dest
file and ensure it names the same entity we previously stat'ed.
llvm-svn: 337649
First, <experimental/filesystem> didn't correctly guard
against min/max macros. This adds the proper push/pop macro guards.
Second, an internal time helper had been renamed but the test for
it hadn't been updated. This patch updates those tests.
llvm-svn: 337520
Summary:
This patch implements directory_entry caching *almost* as specified in P0317r1. However, I explicitly chose to deviate from the standard as I'll explain below.
The approach I decided to take is a fully caching one. When `refresh()` is called, the cache is populated by calls to `stat` and `lstat` as needed.
During directory iteration the cache is only populated with the `file_type` as reported by `readdir`.
The cache can be in the following states:
* `_Empty`: There is nothing in the cache (likely due to an error)
* `_IterSymlink`: Created by directory iteration when we walk onto a symlink only the symlink file type is known.
* `_IterNonSymlink`: Created by directory iteration when we walk onto a non-symlink. Both the regular file type and symlink file type are known.
* `_RefreshSymlink` and `_RefreshNonSymlink`: A full cache created by `refresh()`. This case includes dead symlinks.
* `_RefreshSymlinkUnresolved`: A partial cache created by refresh when we fail to resolve the file pointed to by a symlink (likely due to permissions). Symlink attributes are cached, but attributes about the linked entity are not.
As mentioned, this implementation purposefully deviates from the standard. According to some readings of the specification, and the Windows filesystem implementation, the constructors and modifiers which don't pass an `error_code` must throw when the `directory_entry` points to a entity which doesn't exist. or when attribute resolution fails for another reason.
@BillyONeal has proposed a more reasonable set of requirements, where modifiers other than refresh ignore errors. This is the behavior libc++ currently implements, with the expectation some form of the new language will be accepted into the standard.
Some additional semantics which differ from the Windows implementation:
1. `refresh` will not throw when the entry doesn't exist. In this case we can still meet the functions specification, so we don't treat it as an error.
2. We don't clear the path name when a constructor fails via refresh (this will hopefully be changed in the standard as well).
It should be noted that libstdc++'s current implementation has the same behavior as libc++, except for point (2).
If the changes to the specification don't get accepted, we'll be able to make the changes later.
[1] http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0317r1.html
Reviewers: mclow.lists, gromer, ldionne, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: BillyONeal, christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49530
llvm-svn: 337516
* Remove unused type from is_assignable.pass.cpp
* Don't specialize `common_type<::X<float>>` in common_type.pass.cpp, which violates the requirements of [meta.trans.other]/5
llvm-svn: 336618
When built against the old libc++ version the test was causing linker error
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"std::experimental::fundamentals_v1::pmr::new_delete_resource()", referenced from:
void test_evil<WidgetV0, WidgetV0>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV0, WidgetV1>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV0, WidgetV2>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV0, WidgetV3>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV1, WidgetV0>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV1, WidgetV1>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
void test_evil<WidgetV1, WidgetV2>() in construct_piecewise_pair_evil.pass.cpp.o
...
llvm-svn: 334431
C++2a[container.requirements.general]p8 states that when move constructing
a container, the allocator is move constructed. Vector previously copy
constructed these allocators. This patch fixes that bug.
Additionally it cleans up some unnecessary allocator conversions
when copy constructing containers. Libc++ uses
__internal_allocator_traits::select_on_copy_construction to select
the correct allocator during copy construction, but it unnecessarily
converted the resulting allocator to the user specified allocator
type and back. After this patch list and forward_list no longer
do that.
Technically we're supposed to be using allocator_traits<allocator_type>::select_on_copy_construction,
but that should seemingly be addressed as a separate patch, if at all.
llvm-svn: 334053
Summary:
The filesystem test was confused about access versus write / modification time. The spec says:
file_time_type last_write_time(const path& p, error_code& ec) noexcept;
Returns: The time of last data modification of p, determined as if by the value of the POSIX stat structure member st_mtime obtained as if by POSIX stat(). The signature with argument ec returns file_time_type::min() if an error occurs.
The test was looking at st_atime, not st_mtime, when comparing the result from last_write_time. That was probably due to using a pair instead of naming things nicely or using types. I opted to rename things so it's clearer.
This used to cause test bot failures.
<rdar://problem/40648859>
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, aemerson
Subscribers: christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47557
llvm-svn: 333723
Patch from Arthur O'Dwyer.
In the TS, `uses_allocator` construction for `pair` tried to use an allocator
type of `memory_resource*`, which is incorrect because `memory_resource*` is
not an allocator type. LWG 2969 fixed it to use `polymorphic_allocator` as the
allocator type instead.
https://wg21.link/lwg2969
(D47090 included this in `<memory_resource>`; at Eric's request, I've split
this out into its own patch applied to the existing
`<experimental/memory_resource>` instead.)
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D47109
llvm-svn: 333384
That's r333325, as well as follow-up "Fix GCC handling of ATOMIC_VAR_INIT"
r333327.
Marshall asked to revert:
Let's have a discussion about how to implement this so that it is more friendly
to people with installed code bases. We've had *extremely* loud responses to
unilaterally adding warnings - especially ones that can't be easily disabled -
to the libc++ code base in the past.
llvm-svn: 333351
r333325 from D47225 added warning checks, and the test was written to be C++11 correct by using ATOMIC_VAR_INIT (note that the committee fixed that recently...). It seems like GCC can't handle ATOMIC_VAR_INIT well because it generates 'type 'std::atomic<int>' cannot be initialized with an initializer list' on bot libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx03. Drop the ATOMIC_VAR_INITs since they weren't required to test the diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 333327
Summary:
The atomic non-member functions accept pointers to std::atomic / std::atomic_flag as well as to the non-atomic value. These are all dereferenced unconditionally when lowered, and therefore will fault if null. It's a tiny gotcha for new users, especially when they pass in NULL as expected value (instead of passing a pointer to a NULL value). We can therefore use the nonnull attribute to denote that:
- A warning should be generated if the argument is null
- It is undefined behavior if the argument is null (because a dereference will segfault)
This patch adds support for this attribute for clang and GCC, and sticks to the subset of the syntax both supports. In particular, work around this GCC oddity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60625
The attributes are documented:
- https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.0/gcc/Function-Attributes.html
- https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#nullability-attributes
I'm authoring a companion clang patch for the __c11_* and __atomic_* builtins, which currently only warn on a subset of the pointer parameters.
In all cases the check needs to be explicit and not use the empty nonnull list, because some of the overloads are for atomic<T*> and the values themselves are allowed to be null.
<rdar://problem/18473124>
Reviewers: arphaman, EricWF
Subscribers: aheejin, christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47225
llvm-svn: 333325
Checking for complete types is really rather tricky when you consider
the amount of specializations required to check a function type. This
specifically caused PR37407 where we incorrectly diagnosed
noexcept function types as incomplete (but there were plenty of other
cases that would cause this).
This patch removes the complete type checking for now. I'm going
to look into adding a clang builtin to correctly do this for us.
llvm-svn: 332040
Atomics in C and C++ are incompatible at the moment and mixing the
headers can result in confusing error messages.
Emit an error explicitly telling about the incompatibility. Introduce
the macro `__ALLOW_STDC_ATOMICS_IN_CXX__` that allows to choose in C++
between C atomics and C++ atomics.
rdar://problem/27435938
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: jkorous-apple, christof, bumblebritches57, JonChesterfield, smeenai, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45470
llvm-svn: 331379
When using an old version of glibc, a ::isinf(double) and ::isnan(double)
function is provided, rather than just the macro required by C and C++.
Displace this function using _LIBCPP_PREFERRED_OVERLOAD where possible.
The only remaining case where we should get the wrong return type is now
glibc + libc++ + a non-clang compiler.
llvm-svn: 331241
seekoff.pass.cpp:
libc++'s tests are asserting things about the buffer passed to pubsetbuf. [filebuf.virtuals]/12 says that what the filebuf does with the buffer you give it is completely implementation defined. The MSVC++ implementation takes that buffer and hands it off to the CRT (by calling ::setvbuf) and the CRT doesn't necessarily follow the pattern this test wants.
This change simply makes asserts against the buffer's contents use LIBCPP_ASSERT instead of assert.
pbackfail.pass.cpp:
libc++'s tests are asserting about what characters will and will not be available in the putback area. [filebuf.virtuals]/9 says "The function can alter the number of putback positions available as a result of any call." This change LIBCPP_ASSERTS libc++'s behavior, but checks invariants of the putback area independently.
llvm-svn: 330999
Be defensive against a reentrant std::function::operator=(nullptr_t), in case
the held function object has a non-trivial destructor. Destroying the function
object in-place can lead to the destructor being called twice.
Patch by Duncan P. N. Exon Smith. C++03 support by Volodymyr Sapsai.
rdar://problem/32836603
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits, arphaman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34331
llvm-svn: 330885
These io_error asserts that std::errc::is_a_directory has message "Is a directory". On MSVC++ it reports "is a directory" (with a lowercase I). That doesn't matter for the ios_failure component being tested, so just implement in terms of system_category().message().
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D45715
llvm-svn: 330791
There are 3 changes:
* Renamed genertor.pass.cpp to generator.pass.cpp
* Removed nothing_to_do.pass.cpp
* Mark GCC 4.9 as UNSUPPORTED for the test files that have negative
narrowing conversion SFINAE test (see GCC PR63723).
llvm-svn: 330655
Summary:
The patch includes all declarations, and also implements the following features:
* ABI.
* narrowing-conversion related SFIANE, including simd<> ctors and (static_)simd_cast.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: lichray, sanjoy, MaskRay, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41148
llvm-svn: 330627
This test code triggers the MSVC warning:
"unary minus operator applied to unsigned type, result still unsigned"
Although it would be possible to change the test code to avoid
this warning, I have chosen to simply silence it.
Fixes D45594.
llvm-svn: 329976
Replace unary_function inheritance (which was never required,
even in C++98) with argument_type and result_type typedefs.
This increases portability, as unary_function was removed in C++17
and MSVC has implemented that removal.
Fixes D45596.
llvm-svn: 329974
MSVC emits "warning C4244: 'initializing': conversion from 'int'
to 'short', possible loss of data" when it sees pair<Whatever, short>
constructed from (whatever, 4), because int is being truncated to
short within pair's constructor. (The compiler doesn't take into
account the fact that 4 is a literal at the callsite; it generates
this warning when the constructor is instantiated, because it might
be called with a runtime-valued int that would actually truncate.)
Instead of static_cast<short>, we can simply change short to int
in these tests, without affecting the pair operations that they're
trying to test: move assignment, convert copy construction, and
convert move construction.
Fixes D45016.
llvm-svn: 329973
Patch from Joe Loser.
Several unit tests meaning to test the behavior of lvalue insertion incorrectly
pass rvalues. Fixes bug PR # 27394
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D44411
llvm-svn: 329541
Summary:
D44883 extends -Wself-assign to also work on C++ classes.
These new warnings pop up in the test suite, so they have to be silenced.
Please refer to the D45082 for disscussion on whether this is the right way to solve this.
Testing: `ninja check-libcxx check-libcxxabi` in stage-2 build.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45128
llvm-svn: 329490
this patch adds the <compare> header and implements all of it
except for [comp.alg].
As I understand it, the header is needed by the compiler in
when implementing the semantics of operator<=>. For that reason
I feel it's important to land this header early, despite
all compilers lacking support.
llvm-svn: 329460
Louis Dionne