Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Craig Topper d1498ed8df [CostModel][X86] Fix overcounting arithmetic cost in illegal types in getArithmeticReductionCost/getMinMaxReductionCost
We were overcounting the number of arithmetic operations needed at each level before we reach a legal type. We were using the full vector type for that level, but we are going to split the input vector at that level in half. So the effective arithmetic operation cost at that level is half the width.

So for example on 8i32 on an sse target. Were were calculating the cost of an 8i32 op which is likely 2 for basic integer. Then after the loop we count 2 more v4i32 ops. For a total arith cost of 4. But if you look at the assembly there would only be 3 arithmetic ops.

There are still more bugs in this code that I'm going to work on next. The non pairwise code shouldn't count extract subvectors in the loop. There are no extracts, the types are split in registers. For pairwise we need to use 2 two src permute shuffles.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55397

llvm-svn: 348621
2018-12-07 18:20:56 +00:00
Craig Topper 381b4fb0ab [X86] Remove -costmodel-reduxcost=true from the experimental vector reduction intrinsic tests as it appears to be unnecessary. NFC
I think this has something to do with matching reductions from extractelement, binops, and shuffles. But we're not matching here.

llvm-svn: 348340
2018-12-05 07:56:50 +00:00
Craig Topper b4719e5842 [X86] Add more cost model tests for vector reductions with narrow vector types. NFC
llvm-svn: 348339
2018-12-05 07:26:57 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 102854f4d4 [TTI] Reduction costs only need to include a single extract element cost (REAPPLIED)
We were adding the entire scalarization extraction cost for reductions, which returns the total cost of extracting every element of a vector type.

For reductions we don't need to do this - we just need to extract the 0'th element after the reduction pattern has completed.

Fixes PR37731

Rebased and reapplied after being reverted in rL347541 due to PR39774 - which was fixed by D54955/rL347759 and D55017/rL347997

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54585

llvm-svn: 348076
2018-12-01 14:18:31 +00:00
Fedor Sergeev 8cd9d1b5ce Revert "[TTI] Reduction costs only need to include a single extract element cost"
This reverts commit r346970.
It was causing PR39774, a crash in slp-vectorizer on a rather simple loop
with just a bunch of 'and's in the body.

llvm-svn: 347541
2018-11-26 10:17:27 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 924f193419 [TTI] Reduction costs only need to include a single extract element cost
We were adding the entire scalarization extraction cost for reductions, which returns the total cost of extracting every element of a vector type.

For reductions we don't need to do this - we just need to extract the 0'th element after the reduction pattern has completed.

Fixes PR37731

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54585

llvm-svn: 346970
2018-11-15 17:42:53 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim fc8f1d7da7 [CostModel][X86] SK_ExtractSubvector is free if the subvector is at the start of the source vector
llvm-svn: 346538
2018-11-09 19:04:27 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 44a9a71d2a [TTI] Fix uses of SK_ExtractSubvector shuffle costs (PR39368)
Correct costings of SK_ExtractSubvector requires the SubTy argument to indicate the type/size of the extracted subvector.

Unlike the rest of the shuffle kinds this means that the main Ty argument represents the source vector type not the destination!

I've done my best to fix a number of vectorizer uses:

SLP - the reduction epilogue costs should be using a SK_PermuteSingleSrc shuffle as these all occur at the hardware vector width - we're not extracting (illegal) subvector types. This is causing the cost model diffs as SK_ExtractSubvector costs are poorly handled and tend to just return 1 at the moment.

LV - I'm not clear on what the SK_ExtractSubvector should represents for recurrences - I've used a <1 x ?> subvector extraction as that seems to match the VF delta.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53573

llvm-svn: 345617
2018-10-30 18:10:02 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim e612ab0c80 [CostModel][X86] Add integer vector reduction cost tests
llvm-svn: 344846
2018-10-20 14:29:59 +00:00