The missed load folding noticed in D55898 is visible independent of that change
either with an adjusted IR pattern to start or with AVX2/AVX512 (where the build
vector becomes a broadcast first; movddup is not produced until we get into isel
via tablegen patterns).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55936
llvm-svn: 350005
This is admittedly a narrow fix for the problem:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37502
...but as the XOP restriction shows, it's a maze to get this right.
In the motivating example, note that we have movddup before SSE4.1 and
again with AVX2. That's because insertps isn't available pre-SSE41 and
vbroadcast is (more generally) available with AVX2 (and the splat is
reduced to movddup via isel pattern).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55898
llvm-svn: 349937
This adds an AVX512 run as suggested in D55936.
The test didn't really belong with other build vector tests
because that's not the pattern here. I don't see much value
in adding 64-bit RUNs because they wouldn't exercise the
isel patterns that we're aiming to expose.
llvm-svn: 349920
Don't combine buildvector(binop(),binop(),binop(),binop()) -> binop(buildvector(), buildvector()) if its a splat - keep the binop scalar and just splat the result to avoid large vector constants.
llvm-svn: 321607
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
Relanding after rewriting undef.ll test to avoid host-dependant
endianness.
As discussed in D34087, rewrite areNonVolatileConsecutiveLoads using
generic checks. Also, propagate missing local handling from there to
BaseIndexOffset checks.
Tests of note:
* test/CodeGen/X86/build-vector* - Improved.
* test/CodeGen/BPF/undef.ll - Improved store alignment allows an
additional store merge
* test/CodeGen/X86/clear_upper_vector_element_bits.ll - This is a
case we already do not handle well. Here, the DAG is improved, but
scheduling causes a code size degradation.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, andreadb, filcab
Subscribers: nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34472
llvm-svn: 307114
As discussed in D34087, rewrite areNonVolatileConsecutiveLoads using
generic checks. Also, propagate missing local handling from there to
BaseIndexOffset checks.
Tests of note:
* test/CodeGen/X86/build-vector* - Improved.
* test/CodeGen/BPF/undef.ll - Improved store alignment allows an
additional store merge
* test/CodeGen/X86/clear_upper_vector_element_bits.ll - This is a
case we already do not handle well. Here, the DAG is improved, but
scheduling causes a code size degradation.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, andreadb, filcab
Subscribers: nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34472
llvm-svn: 306819
We currently generate BUILD_VECTOR as a tree of UNPCKL shuffles of the same type:
e.g. for v4f32:
Step 1: unpcklps 0, 2 ==> X: <?, ?, 2, 0>
: unpcklps 1, 3 ==> Y: <?, ?, 3, 1>
Step 2: unpcklps X, Y ==> <3, 2, 1, 0>
The issue is because we are not placing sequential vector elements together early enough, we fail to recognise many combinable patterns - consecutive scalar loads, extractions etc.
Instead, this patch unpacks progressively larger sequential vector elements together:
e.g. for v4f32:
Step 1: unpcklps 0, 2 ==> X: <?, ?, 1, 0>
: unpcklps 1, 3 ==> Y: <?, ?, 3, 2>
Step 2: unpcklpd X, Y ==> <3, 2, 1, 0>
This does mean that we are creating UNPCKL shuffle of different value types, but the relevant combines that benefit from this are quite capable of handling the additional BITCASTs that are now included in the shuffle tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33864
llvm-svn: 304688
Sanjay Patel