I'm circling back around to a loose end from D51929.
The backend (either CGP or DAG) doesn't recognize this pattern, so we end up with different asm for these IR variants.
Regardless of any future changes to canonicalize to saturation/overflow intrinsics, we want to get raw IR variations
into the minimal number of raw IR forms. If/when we can canonicalize to intrinsics, that will make that step easier.
Pre: C2 == ~C1
%a = add i32 %x, C1
%c = icmp ugt i32 %x, C2
%r = select i1 %c, i32 -1, i32 %a
=>
%a = add i32 %x, C1
%c2 = icmp ult i32 %x, C2
%r = select i1 %c2, i32 %a, i32 -1
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pkH
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57352
llvm-svn: 352536
We should choose one of these as canonical:
%z = zext i1 %cmp to i32
%r = sub i32 %x, %z
=>
%s = sext i1 %cmp to i32
%r = add i32 %x, %s
The test comments assume that the zext form is better,
but we can adjust that if we decide to go the other way.
llvm-svn: 352515
I had a local change I hadn't realized when submitting that auto-update. As such, the auto-update was wrong. This should fix it, and with that, it's clearly time to stop submitting changes and go to bed.
llvm-svn: 352454
This file appears to have been manually editted at some point after being auto-updated. A future change adjusts this file slightly, and all of the updates makes the diff super confusing.
llvm-svn: 352453
GEPs can produce either scalar or vector results. If we're extracting only a subset of the vector lanes, simplifying the operands is helpful in eliminating redundant computation, and (eventually) allowing further optimizations
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57177
llvm-svn: 352440
Bitcast and certain Ptr2Int/Int2Ptr instructions will not alter the
value of their operand and can therefore be looked through when we
determine non-nullness.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54956
llvm-svn: 352293
This is the first part of splitting apart https://reviews.llvm.org/D57140 into usuable pieces. Landing the tests in advance of posting a review specifically for the demanded elements part.
llvm-svn: 352091
Followup to D55745, this time handling comparisons with ugt and ult
predicates (which are the canonical forms for non-equality predicates).
For ctlz we can convert into a simple icmp, for cttz we can convert
into a mask check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56355
llvm-svn: 351645
Summary:
InstCombine's sinking algorithm only thinks about memory. It doesn't
think about non-memory constraints like stack object lifetime. It can
sink dynamic allocas across a stacksave call, which may be used with
stackrestore, which can incorrectly reduce the lifetime of the dynamic
alloca.
Fixes PR40365
Reviewers: hfinkel, efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56872
llvm-svn: 351475
InstCombine is able to transform mem transfer instrinsic to alone store or store/load pair.
It might result in generation of unaligned atomic load/store which later in backend
will be transformed to libcall. It is not an evident gain and it is better to keep intrinsic as is
and handle it at backend.
Reviewers: reames, anna, apilipenko, mkazantsev
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: t.p.northover, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56582
llvm-svn: 351295
compiler identification lines in test-cases.
(Doing so only because it's then easier to search for references which
are actually important and need fixing.)
llvm-svn: 351200
Summary:
This allows moving the condition from the intrinsic to the standard ICmp
opcode, so that LLVM can do simplifications on it. The icmp.i1 intrinsic
is an identity for retrieving the SGPR mask.
And we can also get the mask from and i1, or i1, xor i1.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52060
llvm-svn: 351150
TFE and LWE support requires extra result registers that are written in the
event of a failure in order to detect that failure case.
The specific use-case that initiated these changes is sparse texture support.
This means that if image intrinsics are used with either option turned on, the
programmer must ensure that the return type can contain all of the expected
results. This can result in redundant registers since the vector size must be a
power-of-2.
This change takes roughly 6 parts:
1. Modify the instruction defs in tablegen to add new instruction variants that
can accomodate the extra return values.
2. Updates to lowerImage in SIISelLowering.cpp to accomodate setting TFE or LWE
(where the bulk of the work for these instruction types is now done)
3. Extra verification code to catch cases where intrinsics have been used but
insufficient return registers are used.
4. Modification to the adjustWritemask optimisation to account for TFE/LWE being
enabled (requires extra registers to be maintained for error return value).
5. An extra pass to zero initialize the error value return - this is because if
the error does not occur, the register is not written and thus must be zeroed
before use. Also added a new (on by default) option to ensure ALL return values
are zero-initialized that is required for sparse texture support.
6. Disable the inst_combine optimization in the presence of tfe/lwe (later TODO
for this to re-enable and handle correctly).
There's an additional fix now to avoid a dmask=0
For an image intrinsic with tfe where all result channels except tfe
were unused, I was getting an image instruction with dmask=0 and only a
single vgpr result for tfe. That is incorrect because the hardware
assumes there is at least one vgpr result, plus the one for tfe.
Fixed by forcing dmask to 1, which gives the desired two vgpr result
with tfe in the second one.
The TFE or LWE result is returned from the intrinsics using an aggregate
type. Look in the test code provided to see how this works, but in essence IR
code to invoke the intrinsic looks as follows:
%v = call {<4 x float>,i32} @llvm.amdgcn.image.load.1d.v4f32i32.i32(i32 15,
i32 %s, <8 x i32> %rsrc, i32 1, i32 0)
%v.vec = extractvalue {<4 x float>, i32} %v, 0
%v.err = extractvalue {<4 x float>, i32} %v, 1
This re-submit of the change also includes a slight modification in
SIISelLowering.cpp to work-around a compiler bug for the powerpc_le
platform that caused a buildbot failure on a previous submission.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48826
Change-Id: If222bc03642e76cf98059a6bef5d5bffeda38dda
Work around for ppcle compiler bug
Change-Id: Ie284cf24b2271215be1b9dc95b485fd15000e32b
llvm-svn: 351054
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40110.
This implements handling of undef operands for integer intrinsics in
ConstantFolding, in particular for the bitcounting intrinsics (ctpop,
cttz, ctlz), the with.overflow intrinsics, the saturating math
intrinsics and the funnel shift intrinsics.
The undef behavior follows what InstSimplify does for the general cas
e of non-constant operands. For the bitcount intrinsics (where
InstSimplify doesn't do undef handling -- there cannot be a combination
of an undef + non-constant operand) I'm using a 0 result if the intrinsic
is defined for zero and undef otherwise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55950
llvm-svn: 350971
The C standard says "The memchr function locates the first
occurrence of c (converted to an unsigned char)[...]". The expansion
was missing the conversion to unsigned char.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39041 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55947
llvm-svn: 350775
This is matching the equivalent of the DAG expansion,
so it should never end up with worse perf than the
original code even if the target doesn't have a rotate
instruction.
llvm-svn: 350672
Change part of the tests to use vectors (I'm using scalar for ugt
and vector for ult), add multiuse variations, rename %lz to %tz
for the cttz tests.
llvm-svn: 350471
The cttz/ctlz intrinsics have a parameter specifying whether the
result is undefined for zero. cttz(x, false) can be relaxed to
cttz(x, true) if x is known non-zero, and in fact such an optimization
is already performed. However, this currently doesn't work if x is
non-zero as a result of a select rather than an explicit branch.
This patch adds handling for this case, thus allowing
x != 0 ? cttz(x, false) : y to simplify to x != 0 ? cttz(x, true) : y.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55786
llvm-svn: 350463
Similar to rL350199 - there are no known analysis/codegen holes for
funnel shift intrinsics now, so we can canonicalize the 6+ regular
instructions to funnel shift to improve vectorization, inlining,
unrolling, etc.
llvm-svn: 350419
The final piece of IR-level analysis to allow this was committed with:
rL350188
Using the intrinsics should improve transforms based on cost models
like vectorization and inlining.
The backend should be prepared too, so we can now canonicalize more
sequences of shift/logic to the intrinsics and know that the end
result should be equal or better to the original code even if the
target does not have an actual rotate instruction.
llvm-svn: 350199
As discussed on D55894, this replaces the existing PADDS/PSUBUS intrinsics with the the sadd/ssub.sat generic intrinsics and moves the tests out of the x86 subfolder.
PR40110 has been raised to fix the regression with constant folding vectors containing undef elements.
llvm-svn: 349759
The current llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata has a problem in that
it uses LoopIDs. LoopID unfortunately is not loop identifier. It is
neither unique (there's even a regression test assigning the some LoopID
to multiple loops; can otherwise happen if passes such as LoopVersioning
make copies of entire loops) nor persistent (every time a property is
removed/added from a LoopID's MDNode, it will also receive a new LoopID;
this happens e.g. when calling Loop::setLoopAlreadyUnrolled()).
Since most loop transformation passes change the loop attributes (even
if it just to mark that a loop should not be processed again as
llvm.loop.isvectorized does, for the versioned and unversioned loop),
the parallel access information is lost for any subsequent pass.
This patch unlinks LoopIDs and parallel accesses.
llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata on instruction is replaced by
llvm.access.group metadata. llvm.access.group points to a distinct
MDNode with no operands (avoiding the problem to ever need to add/remove
operands), called "access group". Alternatively, it can point to a list
of access groups. The LoopID then has an attribute
llvm.loop.parallel_accesses with all the access groups that are parallel
(no dependencies carries by this loop).
This intentionally avoid any kind of "ID". Loops that are clones/have
their attributes modifies retain the llvm.loop.parallel_accesses
attribute. Access instructions that a cloned point to the same access
group. It is not necessary for each access to have it's own "ID" MDNode,
but those memory access instructions with the same behavior can be
grouped together.
The behavior of llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access is not changed by this
patch, but should be considered deprecated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52116
llvm-svn: 349725
There's a mismatch internally about how we are handling these patterns.
We count loads as cheapToScalarize(), but then we don't actually
scalarize them, so that can leave extra instructions compared to where
we started when scalarizing other ops. If it's cheapToScalarize, then
we should be scalarizing.
llvm-svn: 349560
Checking whether a number has a certain number of trailing / leading
zeros means checking whether it is of the form XXXX1000 / 0001XXXX,
which can be done with an and+icmp.
Related to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28668. As a next
step, this can be extended to non-equality predicates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55745
llvm-svn: 349530
The problem is shown specifically for a case with vector multiply here:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40032
...and this might mask the original backend bug for ARM shown in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39967
As the test diffs here show, we were (and probably still aren't) doing
these kinds of transforms in a principled way. We are producing more or
equal wide instructions than we started with in some cases, so we still
need to restrict/correct other transforms from overstepping.
If there are perf regressions from this change, we can either carve out
exceptions to the general IR rules, or improve the backend to do these
transforms when we know the transform is profitable. That's probably
similar to a change like D55448.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55744
llvm-svn: 349389
Sanjay Patel