A volatile operation cannot be used to prove an address points to normal
memory. (LangRef was recently updated to state it explicitly.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57040
llvm-svn: 352109
For the given test SROA detects possible replacement and creates a correct alloca. After that SROA is adding lifetime markers for this new alloca. The function getNewAllocaSlicePtr is trying to deduce the pointer type based on the original alloca, which is split, to use it later in lifetime intrinsic.
For the test we ended up with such code (rA is initial alloca [10 x float], which is split, and rA.sroa.0.0 is a new split allocation)
```
%rA.sroa.0.0.rA.sroa_cast = bitcast i32* %rA.sroa.0 to [10 x float]* <----- this one causing the assertion and is an extra bitcast
%5 = bitcast [10 x float]* %rA.sroa.0.0.rA.sroa_cast to i8*
call void @llvm.lifetime.start.p0i8(i64 4, i8* %5)
```
isAllocaPromotable code assumes that a user of alloca may go into lifetime marker through bitcast but it must be the only one bitcast to i8* type. In the test it's not a i8* type, return false and throw the assertion.
As we are creating a pointer, which will be used in lifetime markers only, the proposed fix is to create a bitcast to i8* immediately to avoid extra bitcast creation.
The test is a greatly simplified to just reproduce the assertion.
Author: Igor Tsimbalist <igor.v.tsimbalist@intel.com>
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55934
llvm-svn: 351325
The current llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata has a problem in that
it uses LoopIDs. LoopID unfortunately is not loop identifier. It is
neither unique (there's even a regression test assigning the some LoopID
to multiple loops; can otherwise happen if passes such as LoopVersioning
make copies of entire loops) nor persistent (every time a property is
removed/added from a LoopID's MDNode, it will also receive a new LoopID;
this happens e.g. when calling Loop::setLoopAlreadyUnrolled()).
Since most loop transformation passes change the loop attributes (even
if it just to mark that a loop should not be processed again as
llvm.loop.isvectorized does, for the versioned and unversioned loop),
the parallel access information is lost for any subsequent pass.
This patch unlinks LoopIDs and parallel accesses.
llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata on instruction is replaced by
llvm.access.group metadata. llvm.access.group points to a distinct
MDNode with no operands (avoiding the problem to ever need to add/remove
operands), called "access group". Alternatively, it can point to a list
of access groups. The LoopID then has an attribute
llvm.loop.parallel_accesses with all the access groups that are parallel
(no dependencies carries by this loop).
This intentionally avoid any kind of "ID". Loops that are clones/have
their attributes modifies retain the llvm.loop.parallel_accesses
attribute. Access instructions that a cloned point to the same access
group. It is not necessary for each access to have it's own "ID" MDNode,
but those memory access instructions with the same behavior can be
grouped together.
The behavior of llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access is not changed by this
patch, but should be considered deprecated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52116
llvm-svn: 349725
When splitting up an alloca's uses we were dropping any explicit
alignment tags, which means they default to the ABI-required default
alignment and this can cause miscompiles if the real value was smaller.
Also refactor the TBAA metadata into a parent class since it's shared by
both children anyway.
llvm-svn: 349465
This fixes an assertion when constant folding a GEP when the part of the offset
was in i32 (IndexSize, as per DataLayout) and part in the i64 (PointerSize) in
the newly created test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52609
llvm-svn: 345585
Splitting an alloca can decrease the alignment of GEPs into the
partition. Normally, rewriting accounts for this, but the code was
missing for uses of PHI nodes and select instructions.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38707 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51335
llvm-svn: 341094
When rewriting an alloca partition copy the DL from the
old alloca over the the new one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48640
llvm-svn: 335904
Summary:
The verifier accepts PHI nodes with multiple entries for the
same basic block, as long as the value is the same.
As seen in PR37203, SROA did not handle such PHI nodes properly
when speculating loads over the PHI, since it inserted multiple
loads in the predecessor block and changed the PHI into having
multiple entries for the same basic block, but with different
values.
This patch teaches SROA to reuse the same speculated load for
each PHI duplicate entry in such situations.
Resolves: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37203
Reviewers: uabelho, chandlerc, hfinkel, bkramer, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: dberlin, efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46426
llvm-svn: 332577
The current integer widening does not support rewriting partial split slices in rewriteIntegerStore (and rewriteIntegerLoad).
This patch adds explicit checks for this case in isIntegerWideningViableForSlice.
Before r322533, splitting is allowed only for the whole-alloca slice and hence the above case is implicitly rejected by another check `if (DL.getTypeStoreSize(ValueTy) > Size)` because whole-alloca slice is larger than the partition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46750
llvm-svn: 332575
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
Summary:
This change is part of step five in the series of changes to remove alignment argument from
memcpy/memmove/memset in favour of alignment attributes. In particular, this changes the
SROA pass to cease using the old getAlignment() & setAlignment() APIs of MemoryIntrinsic in
favour of getting source & dest specific alignments through the new API. This allows us
to enhance visitMemTransferInst to be more aggressive setting the alignment in memcpy
calls that it creates, as well as to only change the alignment of a memcpy/memmove
argument that it replaces.
Steps:
Step 1) Remove alignment parameter and create alignment parameter attributes for
memcpy/memmove/memset. ( rL322965, rC322964, rL322963 )
Step 2) Expand the IRBuilder API to allow creation of memcpy/memmove with differing
source and dest alignments. ( rL323597 )
Step 3) Update Clang to use the new IRBuilder API. ( rC323617 )
Step 4) Update Polly to use the new IRBuilder API. ( rL323618 )
Step 5) Update LLVM passes that create memcpy/memmove calls to use the new IRBuilder API,
and those that use use MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() to use [get|set]DestAlignment()
and [get|set]SourceAlignment() instead. ( rL323886, rL323891, rL324148, rL324273, rL324278,
rL324384, rL324395, rL324402, rL324626, rL324642, rL324653, rL324654, rL324773, rL324774,
rL324781, rL324784, rL324955, rL324960, rL325816 )
Step 6) Remove the single-alignment IRBuilder API for memcpy/memmove, and the
MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() methods.
Reference
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089384.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
Reviewers: chandlerc, bollu, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42974
llvm-svn: 327398
Now that we have the new TBAA metadata format that is capable of
representing accesses to aggregates, we can propagate TBAA access
tags from memory setting and transferring intrinsics to load and
store instructions and vice versa.
Since SROA produces lots of new loads and stores on optimized
builds, this change significantly decreases the share of
undecorated memory accesses on such builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41563
llvm-svn: 325329
This patch fixes the assertion failure in SROA reported in PR35657.
PR35657 reports the assertion failure due to r319522 (splitting for non-whole-alloca slices), but this problem can happen even without r319522.
The problem exists in a check for reusing an existing alloca when rewriting partitions. As the original comment said, we can reuse the existing alloca if the new alloca has the same type and offset with the existing one. But the code checks only type of the alloca and then check the offset using an assert.
In a corner case with out-of-bounds access (e.g. @PR35657 function added in unit test), it is possible that the two allocas have the same type but different offsets.
This patch makes the check of the offset in the if condition, and re-enables the splitting for non-whole-alloca slices.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41981
llvm-svn: 322533
This patch introduce a switch to control splitting of non-whole-alloca slices with default off.
The switch will be default on again after fixing an issue reported in PR35657.
llvm-svn: 320958
Currently, SROA splits loads and stores only when they are accessing the whole alloca.
This patch relaxes this limitation to allow splitting a load/store if all other loads and stores to the alloca are disjoint to or fully included in the current load/store. If there is no other load or store that crosses the boundary of the current load/store, the current splitting implementation works as is.
The whole-alloca loads and stores meet this new condition and so they are still splittable.
Here is a simplified motivating example.
struct record {
long long a;
int b;
int c;
};
int func(struct record r) {
for (int i = 0; i < r.c; i++)
r.b++;
return r.b;
}
When updating r.b (or r.c as well), LLVM generates redundant instructions on some platforms (such as x86_64, ppc64); here, r.b and r.c are packed into one 64-bit GPR when the struct is passed as a method argument.
With this patch, the above example is compiled into only few instructions without loop.
Without the patch, unnecessary loop-carried dependency is introduced by SROA and the loop cannot be eliminated by the later optimizers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32998
llvm-svn: 319407
Revert "[SROA] Propagate !range metadata when moving loads."
Revert "[Mem2Reg] Clang-format unformatted parts of this file. NFCI."
Davide says they broke a bot.
llvm-svn: 319131
This tries to propagate !range metadata to a pre-existing load
when a load is optimized out. This is done instead of adding an
assume because converting loads to and from assumes creates a
lot of IR.
Patch by Ariel Ben-Yehuda.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37216
llvm-svn: 319096
Summary:
SROA can fail in rewriting alloca but still rewrite a phi resulting
in dead instruction elimination. The Changed flag was not being set
correctly, resulting in downstream passes using stale analyses.
The included test case will assert during the second BDCE pass as a
result.
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39921
llvm-svn: 318677
The fix is to avoid invalidating our insertion point in
replaceDbgDeclare:
Builder.insertDeclare(NewAddress, DIVar, DIExpr, Loc, InsertBefore);
+ if (DII == InsertBefore)
+ InsertBefore = &*std::next(InsertBefore->getIterator());
DII->eraseFromParent();
I had to write a unit tests for this instead of a lit test because the
use list order matters in order to trigger the bug.
The reduced C test case for this was:
void useit(int*);
static inline void inlineme() {
int x[2];
useit(x);
}
void f() {
inlineme();
inlineme();
}
llvm-svn: 313905
.. as well as the two subsequent changes r313826 and r313875.
This leads to segfaults in combination with ASAN. Will forward repro
instructions to the original author (rnk).
llvm-svn: 313876
Summary:
This implements the design discussed on llvm-dev for better tracking of
variables that live in memory through optimizations:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-September/117222.html
This is tracked as PR34136
llvm.dbg.addr is intended to be produced and used in almost precisely
the same way as llvm.dbg.declare is today, with the exception that it is
control-dependent. That means that dbg.addr should always have a
position in the instruction stream, and it will allow passes that
optimize memory operations on local variables to insert llvm.dbg.value
calls to reflect deleted stores. See SourceLevelDebugging.rst for more
details.
The main drawback to generating DBG_VALUE machine instrs is that they
usually cause LLVM to emit a location list for DW_AT_location. The next
step will be to teach DwarfDebug.cpp how to recognize more DBG_VALUE
ranges as not needing a location list, and possibly start setting
DW_AT_start_offset for variables whose lifetimes begin mid-scope.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37768
llvm-svn: 313825
Summary:
Most DIExpressions are empty or very simple. When they are complex, they
tend to be unique, so checking them inline is reasonable.
This also avoids the need for CodeGen passes to append to the
llvm.dbg.mir named md node.
See also PR22780, for making DIExpression not be an MDNode.
Reviewers: aprantl, dexonsmith, dblaikie
Subscribers: qcolombet, javed.absar, eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37075
llvm-svn: 311594
There is no situation where this rarely-used argument cannot be
substituted with a DIExpression and removing it allows us to simplify
the DWARF backend. Note that this patch does not yet remove any of
the newly dead code.
rdar://problem/33580047
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35951
llvm-svn: 309426
SROA assumes alloca address space is 0, which causes assertion. This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34104
llvm-svn: 306440
This is based heavily on the work done ni D34285. I mostly wanted to do
test cleanup for the author to save them some time, but I had a really
hard time understanding why it was so hard to write better test cases
for these issues.
The problem is that because SROA does a second rewrite of the loads and
because we *don't* propagate !nonnull for non-pointer loads, we first
introduced invalid !nonnull metadata and then stripped it back off just
in time to avoid most ways of this PR manifesting. Moving to the more
careful utility only fixes this by changing the predicate to look at the
new load's type rather than the target type. However, that *does* fix
the bug, and the utility is much nicer including adding range metadata
to model the nonnull property after a conversion to an integer.
However, we have bigger problems because we don't actually propagate
*range* metadata, and the utility to do this extracted from instcombine
isn't really in good shape to do this currently. It *only* handles the
case of copying range metadata from an integer load to a pointer load.
It doesn't even handle the trivial cases of propagating from one integer
load to another when they are the same width! This utility will need to
be beefed up prior to using in this location to get the metadata to
fully survive.
And even then, we need to go and teach things to turn the range metadata
into an assume the way we do with nonnull so that when we *promote* an
integer we don't lose the information.
All of this will require a new test case that looks kind-of like
`preserve-nonnull.ll` does here but focuses on range metadata. It will
also likely require more testing because it needs to correctly handle
changes to the integer width, especially as SROA actively tries to
change the integer width!
Last but not least, I'm a little worried about hooking the range
metadata up here because the instcombine logic for converting from
a range metadata *to* a nonnull metadata node seems broken in the face
of non-zero address spaces where null is not mapped to the integer `0`.
So that probably needs to get fixed with test cases both in SROA and in
instcombine to cover it.
But this *does* extract the core PR fix from D34285 of preventing the
!nonnull metadata from being propagated in a broken state just long
enough to feed into promotion and crash value tracking.
On D34285 there is some discussion of zero-extend handling because it
isn't necessary. First, the new load size covers all of the non-undef
(ie, possibly initialized) bits. This may even extend past the original
alloca if loading those bits could produce valid data. The only way its
valid for us to zero-extend an integer load in SROA is if the original
code had a zero extend or those bits were undef. And we get to assume
things like undef *never* satifies nonnull, so non undef bits can
participate here. No need to special case the zero-extend handling, it
just falls out correctly.
The original credit goes to Ariel Ben-Yehuda! I'm mostly landing this to
save a few rounds of trivial edits fixing style issues and test case
formulation.
Differental Revision: D34285
llvm-svn: 306379
Currently there is a bug in SROA::presplitLoadsAndStores which causes assertion in
GEPOperator::accumulateConstantOffset.
Basically it does not consider the situation that the pointer operand of load or store
may be in a non-zero address space and its size may be different from the size of
a pointer in address space 0.
This patch fixes assertion when compiling Blender Cycles kernels for amdgpu backend.
Diffferential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33298
llvm-svn: 305107
Summary:
As shown in the test case, SROA was crashing when trying to split
stores (to the alloca) of loads (from anywhere), because it assumed
the pointer operand to the loads and stores had to have the same
address space. This isn't the case. Make sure to use the correct
pointer type for both the load and the store.
Reviewed By: yaxunl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32593
llvm-svn: 304585
LLVM makes several assumptions about address space 0. However,
alloca is presently constrained to always return this address space.
There's no real way to avoid using alloca, so without this
there is no way to opt out of these assumptions.
The problematic assumptions include:
- That the pointer size used for the stack is the same size as
the code size pointer, which is also the maximum sized pointer.
- That 0 is an invalid, non-dereferencable pointer value.
These are problems for AMDGPU because alloca is used to
implement the private address space, which uses a 32-bit
index as the pointer value. Other pointers are 64-bit
and behave more like LLVM's notion of generic address
space. By changing the address space used for allocas,
we can change our generic pointer type to be LLVM's generic
pointer type which does have similar properties.
llvm-svn: 299888
so we can stop using DW_OP_bit_piece with the wrong semantics.
The entire back story can be found here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20161114/405934.html
The gist is that in LLVM we've been misinterpreting DW_OP_bit_piece's
offset field to mean the offset into the source variable rather than
the offset into the location at the top the DWARF expression stack. In
order to be able to fix this in a subsequent patch, this patch
introduces a dedicated DW_OP_LLVM_fragment operation with the
semantics that we used to apply to DW_OP_bit_piece, which is what we
actually need while inside of LLVM. This patch is complete with a
bitcode upgrade for expressions using the old format. It does not yet
fix the DWARF backend to use DW_OP_bit_piece correctly.
Implementation note: We discussed several options for implementing
this, including reserving a dedicated field in DIExpression for the
fragment size and offset, but using an custom operator at the end of
the expression works just fine and is more efficient because we then
only pay for it when we need it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27361
rdar://problem/29335809
llvm-svn: 288683
Preserving lifetime markers isn't as important as allowing promotion,
so just drop the lifetime markers if necessary.
This also fixes an assertion failure where other parts of SROA assumed
that lifetime markers never block promotion.
Fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=29139.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24854
llvm-svn: 288074
SROA doesn't preserve the llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata when it
transforms loads/stores. This patch fixes a couple occurences of this
issue.
(Partially addresses PR28981).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23549
llvm-svn: 281960
pointing to the same addr space. This can prevent SROA from creating a bitcast
between pointers with different addr spaces.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19697
llvm-svn: 268424
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.
Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.
Motivation
----------
Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.
We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.
Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>
llvm-svn: 266446
While not strictly necessary, since we don't support large integer
types, this avoids bugs due to silent truncation from uint64_t to a
32-bit unsigned (e.g. DL.isLegalInteger(DL.getTypeSizeInBits(Ty) )
This fixes PR26972.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18258
llvm-svn: 263850
of, and I misdiagnosed for months and months.
Andrea has had a patch for this forever, but I just couldn't see how
it was fixing the root cause of the problem. It didn't make sense to me,
even though the patch was perfectly good and the analysis of the actual
failure event was *fantastic*.
Well, I came back to it today because the patch has sat for *far* too
long and needs attention and decided I wouldn't let it go until I really
understood what was going on. After quite some time in the debugger,
I finally realized that in fact I had just missed an important case with
my previous attempt to fix PR22093 in r225149. Not only do we need to
handle loads that won't be split, but stores-of-loads that we won't
split. We *do* actually have enough logic in the presplitting to form
new slices for split stores.... *unless* we decided not to split them!
I'm so sorry that it took me this long to come to the realization that
this is the issue. It seems so obvious in hind sight (of course).
Anyways, the fix becomes *much* smaller and more focused. The fact that
we're left doing integer smashing is related to the FIXME in my original
commit: fundamentally, we're not aggressive about pre-splitting for
loads and stores to the same alloca. If we want to get aggressive about
this, it'll need both what Andrea had put into the proposed fix, but
also a *lot* more logic to essentially iteratively pre-split the alloca
until we can't do any more. As I said in that commit log, its really
unclear that this is the right call. Instead, the integer blending and
letting targets lower this to narrower stores seems slightly better. But
we definitely shouldn't really go down that path just to fix this bug.
Again, tons of thanks are owed to Andrea and others at Sony for working
on this bug. I really should have seen what was going on here and
re-directed them sooner. =////
llvm-svn: 263121
Eli Friedman