All the PassBuilder::parse interfaces now return descriptive StringError
instead of a plain bool. It allows to make -passes/aa-pipeline parsing
errors context-specific and thus less confusing.
TODO: ideally we should also make suggestions for misspelled pass names,
but that requires some extensions to PassBuilder.
Reviewed By: philip.pfaffe, chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53246
llvm-svn: 344685
Summary:
All the PassBuilder::parse interfaces now return descriptive StringError
instead of a plain bool. It allows to make -passes/aa-pipeline parsing
errors context-specific and thus less confusing.
TODO: ideally we should also make suggestions for misspelled pass names,
but that requires some extensions to PassBuilder.
Reviewed By: philip.pfaffe, chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53246
llvm-svn: 344519
Summary:
As we teach Clang to use ThinkLTO + new PM, it's good for the users to
inject through Config, instead of setting a flag in the LTOBackend
library. Move the flag to llvm-lto2.
As it moves to llvm-lto2, a new name -use-new-pm seems simpler and as
clear.
Reviewers: davide, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, chandlerc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33799
llvm-svn: 304492
Move LTO::run() to a "run" subcommand so that we can introduce new subcommands
for testing different parts of the LTO implementation.
This doesn't use llvm::cl subcommands because it doesn't appear to be currently
possible to pass an argument not associated with a subcommand to a subcommand
(e.g. -lto-use-new-pm, -mcpu=yonah).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31410
llvm-svn: 299967
until we can get better TargetMachine::isCompatibleDataLayout to compare - otherwise
we can't code generate existing bitcode without a string equality data layout.
This reverts commit r294702.
llvm-svn: 294709
For other platforms we should find out what they need and likely
make the same change, however, a smaller additional change is easier
for platforms we know have it specified in the ABI. As part of this
rewrite some of the handling in the backends for data layout and update
a bunch of testcases.
Based on a patch by Simonas Kazlauskas!
llvm-svn: 294702
Also, udpate the ~60 failing tests in the tree which did
not contain a valid datalayout.
This fixes PR31123. lld will be updated in a following patch,
immediately after this is committed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27082
llvm-svn: 289719
Fedor Sergeev