conversions. Fix an access-control bug where privileges were not considered
at intermediate points along the inheritance path. Prepare for friends.
llvm-svn: 95775
of a C++ record. Exposed a lot of problems where various routines were
silently doing The Wrong Thing (or The Acceptable Thing in The Wrong Order)
when presented with a non-definition. Also cuts down on memory usage.
llvm-svn: 95330
WHAT!?!
It turns out that Type::isPromotableIntegerType() was not considering
enumeration types to be promotable, so we would never do the
promotion despite having properly computed the promotion type when the
enum was defined. Various operations on values of enum type just
"worked" because we could still compute the integer rank of an enum
type; the oddity, however, is that operations such as "add an enum and
an unsigned" would often have an enum result type (!). The bug
actually showed up as a spurious -Wformat diagnostic
(<rdar://problem/7595366>), but in theory it could cause miscompiles.
In this commit:
- Enum types with a promotion type of "int" or "unsigned int" are
promotable.
- Tweaked the computation of promotable types for enums
- For all of the ABIs, treat enum types the same way as their
underlying types (*not* their promotion types) for argument passing
and return values
- Extend the ABI tester with support for enumeration types
llvm-svn: 95117
sequences, where we would occasionally determine (incorrectly) that
one standard conversion sequence was a proper subset of another when,
in fact, they contained completely incomparable conversions.
This change records the types in each step within a standard
conversion sequence, so that we can check the specific comparison
types to determine when one sequence is a proper subset of the
other. Fixes this testcase (thanks, Anders!), which was distilled from
PR6095 (also thanks to Anders).
llvm-svn: 94660
This solution relies on an O(n) scan of redeclarations, which means it might
scale poorly in crazy cases with tons of redeclarations brought in by a ton
of distinct associated namespaces. I believe that avoiding this
is not worth the common-case cost.
llvm-svn: 94530
incomplete type (or a pointer/reference to such).
The causes of this problem are different enough to justify a different "design"
for the diagnostic. Most notably, it doesn't give an operand index:
it's usually pretty obvious which operand is the problem, it adds a lot of
clutter to mention it, and the fix is usually in a different part of the file
anyway.
This is yet another diagnostic that should really have an analogue in the
non-overloaded case --- which should be much easier to write because of
the weaker space constraints.
llvm-svn: 94303
conversions. To make this work, fill out all conversions for all candidates
(but only when diagnosing overload failure). Split out a few cases from
ovl_fail_bad_conversion which didn't actually involve a failed argument
conversion.
I'm pretty sure this is not a well-founded ordering, but I'm not sure it matters.
llvm-svn: 94283
Change LookupResult to use UnresolvedSet. Also extract UnresolvedSet into its
own header and make it templated over an inline capacity.
llvm-svn: 93959
to be considering user-defined conversions in the first place.
Doug, please review; I'm not sure what we should be doing if we see a real
ambiguity in selecting a copy constructor when otherwise suppressing
user-defined conversions.
Fixes PR6014.
llvm-svn: 93365
information to feed diagnostics instead of regenerating it. Much room for
improvement here, but fixes some unfortunate problems reporting on method calls.
llvm-svn: 93316
why the candidate is non-viable. There's a lot we can do to improve this, but
it's a good start. Further improvements should probably be integrated with the
bad-initialization reporting routines.
llvm-svn: 93277
I said to myself, self, why don't you go add a couple of parameters to a method
and then fail to use them, and I thought that sounded like a pretty good idea,
so I did it.
llvm-svn: 93233
fidelity with which we note them as functions/constructors and templates
thereof. Also will be helpful when reporting bad conversions (next).
llvm-svn: 93224
sequence. Lots of small relevant changes. Fixes some serious problems with
ambiguous conversions; also possibly improves associated diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 93214
(C++ [temp.mem]p5-6), which involves template argument deduction based
on the type named, e.g., given
struct X { template<typename T> operator T*(); } x;
when we call
x.operator int*();
we perform template argument deduction to determine that T=int. This
template argument deduction is needed for template specialization and
explicit instantiation, e.g.,
template<> X::operator float*() { /* ... */ }
and when calling or otherwise naming a conversion function (as in the
first example).
This fixes PR5742 and PR5762, although there's some remaining ugliness
that's causing out-of-line definitions of conversion function
templates to fail. I'll look into that separately.
llvm-svn: 93162
not just the viable ones. This is reasonable because the most common use of
deleted functions is to exclude some implicit conversion during calls; users
therefore will want to figure out why some other options were excluded.
Started sorting overload results. Right now it just sorts by location in the
translation unit (after putting viable functions first), but we can do better than
that.
Changed bool OnlyViable parameter to PrintOverloadCandidates to an enum for better
self-documentation.
llvm-svn: 92990
no viable overloads. Use a different message when the class provides
no operator[] overloads at all; use it for operator(), too.
Partially addresses PR 5900.
llvm-svn: 92894
typo.cpp:22:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'radious'; did
you mean 'radius'?
return radious * pi;
^~~~~~~
radius
This was super-easy, since we already had decent recovery by looking
for names in dependent base classes.
llvm-svn: 92341
more or less cv-qualified than another during implicit conversion and overload
resolution ([basic.type.qualifier] p5). Factors the logic out of template
deduction and into the ASTContext so it can be shared.
This fixes several aspects of PR5542, but not all of them.
llvm-svn: 92248
address resolution. This fixes PR5751.
Also, while we're here, remove logic from ADL which mistakenly included the
definition namespaces of overloaded and/or templated functions whose name or
address is used as an argument.
llvm-svn: 92245
constructor call, the conversion is only a standard conversion
sequence if that constructor is a copy constructor. This fixes PR5834
in a semi-lame way, because the "real" fix will be to move over to
InitializationSequence. That will happen "soonish", but not now.
llvm-svn: 91861
explicitly-specified template arguments are enough to determine the
instantiation, and either template argument deduction fails or is not
performed in that context, we can resolve the template-id down to a
function template specialization (so sayeth C++0x
[temp.arg.explicit]p3). Fixes PR5811.
llvm-svn: 91852
function in a C++ call using an arbitrary call-expression type.
Actually exploit this to fix the recovery implemented earlier.
The diagnostic is still iffy, though.
llvm-svn: 91538
used as expressions). In dependent contexts, try to recover by doing a lookup
in previously-dependent base classes. We get better diagnostics out, but
unfortunately the recovery fails: we need to turn it into a method call
expression, not a bare call expression. Thus this is still a WIP.
llvm-svn: 91525
are a couple of O(n^2) operations in this, some analogous to the usual O(n^2)
redeclaration problem and some not. In particular, retroactively removing
shadow declarations when they're hidden by later decls is pretty unfortunate.
I'm not yet convinced it's worse than the alternative, though.
llvm-svn: 91045
new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the
computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic
information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an
expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit
callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow.
Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the
diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit
better than before. Some examples:
p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Derived'
cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base'
Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to
a value of
type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers
Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}}
^ ~~
p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class
'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base':
struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base
struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base
Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from
...
^~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long'
cannot bind to
a value of unrelated type 'int'
long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Base' cannot
bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base'
Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field
'i'
int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here
int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}}
^
llvm-svn: 90992
"integer promotion" type associated with an enum decl, and use this type to
determine which type to promote to. This type obeys C++ [conv.prom]p2 and
is therefore generally signed unless the range of the enumerators forces
it to be unsigned.
Kills off a lot of false positives from -Wsign-compare in C++, addressing
rdar://7455616
llvm-svn: 90965
using value decls; we optimistically assume they won't turn into conflicts.
Teach it to tell the caller *why* the function doesn't overload with the returned
decl; this will be useful for using hiding.
llvm-svn: 90939
pointers thereof) to their corresponding non-noreturn function
types. This conversion is considered an exact match for
overload-resolution purposes. Note that we are a little more strict
that GCC is, because we encode noreturn in the type system, but that's
a Good Thing (TM) because it does not allow us to pretend that
potentially-returning function pointers are non-returning function
pointers.
Fxies PR5620.
llvm-svn: 90913
overloaded-operator resolution is wildly untested, but the parallel code for
methods seems to satisfy some trivial tests.
Also change some overload-resolution APIs to take a type instead of an expression,
which lets us avoid creating a spurious CXXThisExpr when resolving implicit
member accesses.
llvm-svn: 90410
implicit member access to a specific declaration, go ahead and create
it as a DeclRefExpr or a MemberExpr (with implicit CXXThisExpr base) as
appropriate. Otherwise, create an UnresolvedMemberExpr or
DependentScopeMemberExpr with a null base expression.
By representing implicit accesses directly in the AST, we get the ability
to correctly delay the decision about whether it's actually an instance
member access or not until resolution is complete. This permits us
to correctly avoid diagnosing the 'problem' of 'MyType::foo()'
where the relationship to the type isn't really known until instantiation.
llvm-svn: 90266
Create a new UnresolvedMemberExpr for these lookups. Assorted hackery
around qualified member expressions; this will all go away when we
implement the correct (i.e. extremely delayed) implicit-member semantics.
llvm-svn: 90161
DependentScopeDeclRefExpr support storing templateids. Unite the common
code paths between ActOnDeclarationNameExpr and ActOnTemplateIdExpr.
This gets us to a point where we don't need to store function templates in
the AST using TemplateNames, which is critical to ripping out OverloadedFunction.
Also resolves a few FIXMEs.
llvm-svn: 89785
into pretty much everything about overload resolution in order to wean
BuildDeclarationNameExpr off LookupResult::getAsSingleDecl(). Replace
UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr with UnresolvedLookupExpr, which generalizes the
idea of a non-member lookup that we haven't totally resolved yet, whether by
overloading, argument-dependent lookup, or (eventually) the presence of
a function template in the lookup results.
Incidentally fixes a problem with argument-dependent lookup where we were
still performing ADL even when the lookup results contained something from
a block scope.
Incidentally improves a diagnostic when using an ObjC ivar from a class method.
This just fell out from rewriting BuildDeclarationNameExpr's interaction with
lookup, and I'm too apathetic to break it out.
The only remaining uses of OverloadedFunctionDecl that I know of are in
TemplateName and MemberExpr.
llvm-svn: 89544
than tweaking existing ASTs, since we were (*gasp*) stomping on ASTs
within templates. I'm glad we found this little stick of TNT early...
llvm-svn: 89475
strip the sugar off in getFoundDecl() and getAsSingleDecl(), but leave it on for
clients like overload resolution who want to use the iterators.
Refactor a few pieces of overload resolution to strip off using declarations in
a single place. Don't do anything useful with the extra context knowledge yet.
llvm-svn: 89061
LookupResult RAII powers to diagnose ambiguity in the results. Other diagnostics
(e.g. access control and deprecation) will be moved to automatically trigger
during lookup as part of this same mechanism.
This abstraction makes it much easier to encapsulate aliasing declarations
(e.g. using declarations) inside the lookup system: eventually, lookup will
just produce the aliases in the LookupResult, and the standard access methods
will naturally strip the aliases off.
llvm-svn: 89027
sugared types. The basic problem is that our qualifier accessors
(getQualifiers, getCVRQualifiers, isConstQualified, etc.) only look at
the current QualType and not at any qualifiers that come from sugared
types, meaning that we won't see these qualifiers through, e.g.,
typedefs:
typedef const int CInt;
typedef CInt Self;
Self.isConstQualified() currently returns false!
Various bugs (e.g., PR5383) have cropped up all over the front end due
to such problems. I'm addressing this problem by splitting each
qualifier accessor into two versions:
- the "local" version only returns qualifiers on this particular
QualType instance
- the "normal" version that will eventually combine qualifiers from this
QualType instance with the qualifiers on the canonical type to
produce the full set of qualifiers.
This commit adds the local versions and switches a few callers from
the "normal" version (e.g., isConstQualified) over to the "local"
version (e.g., isLocalConstQualified) when that is the right thing to
do, e.g., because we're printing or serializing the qualifiers. Also,
switch a bunch of
Context.getCanonicalType(T1).getUnqualifiedType() == Context.getCanonicalType(T2).getQualifiedType()
expressions over to
Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(T1, T2)
llvm-svn: 88969
type, use full qualified name lookup rather than the poking the
declaration context directly. This makes sure that we see operator()'s
in superclasses. Also, move the complete-type check before this name
lookup.
llvm-svn: 88842
- Also, perform calculated implicit cast sequences if they're determined to work. This finally diagnoses static_cast to ambiguous or implicit bases and fixes two long-standing fixmes in the test case. For the C-style cast, this requires propagating the access check suppression pretty deep into other functions.
- Pass the expressions for TryStaticCast and TryStaticImplicitCast by reference. This should lead to a better AST being emitted for such casts, and also fixes a memory leak, because CheckReferenceInit and PerformImplicitConversion wrap the node passed to them. These wrappers were previously lost.
llvm-svn: 88809
like a copy constructor to the overload set, just ignore it. This
ensures that we don't try to use such a constructor as a copy
constructor *without* triggering diagnostics at the point of
declaration.
Note that we *do* diagnose such copy constructors when explicitly
written by the user (e.g., as an explicit specialization).
llvm-svn: 88733
Douglas Gregor