which are identical to the original patterns.
- Change the multiply with overflow so that we distinguish between signed and
unsigned multiplication. Currently, unsigned multiplication with overflow
isn't working!
llvm-svn: 60963
ISD::ADD to emit an implicit EFLAGS. This was horribly broken. Instead, replace
the intrinsic with an ISD::SADDO node. Then custom lower that into an
X86ISD::ADD node with a associated SETCC that checks the correct condition code
(overflow or carry). Then that gets lowered into the correct X86::ADDOvf
instruction.
Similar for SUB and MUL instructions.
llvm-svn: 60915
loops when they can be subsumed into addressing modes.
Change X86 addressing mode check to realize that
some PIC references need an extra register.
(I believe this is correct for Linux, if not, I'm sure
someone will tell me.)
llvm-svn: 60608
- LowerXADDO lowers [SU]ADDO into an ADD with an implicit EFLAGS define. The
EFLAGS are fed into a SETCC node which has the conditional COND_O or COND_C,
depending on the type of ADDO requested.
- LowerBRCOND now recognizes if it's coming from a SETCC node with COND_O or
COND_C set.
llvm-svn: 60388
ReplaceNodeResults: rather than returning a node which
must have the same number of results as the original
node (which means mucking around with MERGE_VALUES,
and which is also easy to get wrong since SelectionDAG
folding may mean you don't get the node you expect),
return the results in a vector.
llvm-svn: 60348
the conditional for the BRCOND statement. For instance, it will generate:
addl %eax, %ecx
jo LOF
instead of
addl %eax, %ecx
; About 10 instructions to compare the signs of LHS, RHS, and sum.
jl LOF
llvm-svn: 60123
a memset using 16-byte XMM stores, but where the stack realignment code
didn't work. Until it does (PR2962) disable use of xmm regs in memcpy
and memset formation for linux and other targets with insufficiently
aligned stacks.
This is part of PR2888
llvm-svn: 58317
LHS is a foldable load, then LHS and RHS are swapped
and SetCCOpcode is changed to SETUGT. But the later
code is expecting operands to be the wrong way round
for SETUGT, but they are not in this case, resulting
in an inverted compare. The solution is to move the
load normalization before the correction for SETUGT.
This bug was tickled by LegalizeTypes which happened
to legalize the testcase slightly differently to
LegalizeDAG.
llvm-svn: 58092
assume that i64 has been turned into a BUILD_PAIR
node (when called from LegalizeTypes this hasn't
happened yet) and don't use a vector shuffle mask
with an illegal element type.
llvm-svn: 57972
The same one Apple gcc uses, faster. Also gets the
extreme case in gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c
correct which we weren't before; this is not
sufficient to get the test to pass though, there
is another bug.
llvm-svn: 57926
in the 32-bit signed offset field of addresses. Even though this
may be intended, some linkers refuse to relocate code where the
relocated address computation overflows.
Also, fix the sign-extension of constant offsets to use the
actual pointer size, rather than the size of the GlobalAddress
node, which may be different, for example on x86-64 where MVT::i32
is used when the address is being fit into the 32-bit displacement
field.
llvm-svn: 57885
Where previously LLVM might emit code like this:
ucomisd %xmm1, %xmm0
setne %al
setp %cl
orb %al, %cl
jne .LBB4_2
it now emits this:
ucomisd %xmm1, %xmm0
jne .LBB4_2
jp .LBB4_2
It has fewer instructions and uses fewer registers, but it does
have more branches. And in the case that this code is followed by
a non-fallthrough edge, it may be followed by a jmp instruction,
resulting in three branch instructions in sequence. Some effort
is made to avoid this situation.
To achieve this, X86ISelLowering.cpp now recognizes FCMP_OEQ and
FCMP_UNE in lowered form, and replace them with code that emits
two branches, except in the case where it would require converting
a fall-through edge to an explicit branch.
Also, X86InstrInfo.cpp's branch analysis and transform code now
knows now to handle blocks with multiple conditional branches. It
uses loops instead of having fixed checks for up to two
instructions. It can now analyze and transform code generated
from FCMP_OEQ and FCMP_UNE.
llvm-svn: 57873
LowerOperation if it doesn't know what else to do.
This methods should probably be factorized some,
but this is good enough for the moment. Have
LowerATOMIC_BINARY_64 use EXTRACT_ELEMENT rather
than assuming the operand is a BUILD_PAIR (if it
is then getNode will automagically simplify the
EXTRACT_ELEMENT). This way LowerATOMIC_BINARY_64
usable from LegalizeTypes.
llvm-svn: 57831
and add a TargetLowering hook for it to use to determine when this
is legal (i.e. not in PIC mode, etc.)
This allows instruction selection to emit folded constant offsets
in more cases, such as the included testcase, eliminating the need
for explicit arithmetic instructions.
This eliminates the need for the C++ code in X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp
that attempted to achieve the same effect, but wasn't as effective.
Also, fix handling of offsets in GlobalAddressSDNodes in several
places, including changing GlobalAddressSDNode's offset from
int to int64_t.
The Mips, Alpha, Sparc, and CellSPU targets appear to be
unaware of GlobalAddress offsets currently, so set the hook to
false on those targets.
llvm-svn: 57748
in 32-bit mode instead of assigning a register pair. This has nothing to
do with PR2356, but I happened to notice it while working on it.
llvm-svn: 57704
i.e. conditions that cannot be checked with a single instruction. For example,
SETONE and SETUEQ on x86.
- Teach legalizer to implement *illegal* setcc as a and / or of a number of
legal setcc nodes. For now, only implement FP conditions. e.g. SETONE is
implemented as SETO & SETNE, SETUEQ is SETUO | SETEQ.
- Move x86 target over.
llvm-svn: 57542
- Move the EH landing-pad code and adjust it so that it works
with FastISel as well as with SDISel.
- Add FastISel support for @llvm.eh.exception and
@llvm.eh.selector.
llvm-svn: 57539
`-fno-builtin' flag. Currently, it's used to replace "memset" with "_bzero"
instead of "__bzero" on Darwin10+. This arguably violates the meaning of this
flag, but is currently sufficient. The meaning of this flag should become more
specific over time.
llvm-svn: 56885
Mon P Wang