that the destructor body is trivial and that all member variables also have either
trivial destructors or trivial destructor bodies, we don't need to initialize the
vtable pointers since no virtual member functions will be called on the destructor.
Fixes PR9181.
llvm-svn: 131368
send if the receiver is null. Normally it's not worthwhile to check this,
but avoiding the null-initialization is nice, and this also avoids nasty
problems where the null-initialization is visible within the call because
we use an aliased result buffer. rdar://problem/9402992
llvm-svn: 131366
Go through and expand the members of bases into the encoding string (and encode the VTable as well).
Unlike gcc which expands virtual bases as many times as they appear in the
hierarchy, clang will only expand them once at the end, to reflect the actual layout.
Note that there doesn't seem to be a way to indicate in the encoding that
packing/alignment of members is different that normal, in which case
the encoding will be out-of-sync with the real layout.
If the runtime switches to just consider the size of types without
taking into account alignment, we could easily make padding explicit in the
encoding (e.g. using arrays of chars). The encoding strings would be
longer then though.
Also encode a flexible array member as array of 0 size, like gcc, not as a pointer.
llvm-svn: 131365
There are APIs, e.g. [NSValue valueWithBytes:objCType:], which use the encoding to find out
the size of an object pointed to by a pointer. Make things safer by making it illegal to @encode
incomplete types.
llvm-svn: 131364
template<class U>
struct X1 {
template<class T> void f(T*);
template<> void f(int*) { }
};
Won't be so simple. I need to think more about it.
llvm-svn: 131362
out as "v-table" message sends and stop calling normal messages "legacy"
message sends.
Also, fix some comments to reveal the true state of affairs.
llvm-svn: 131335
__has_extension is a function-like macro which takes the same set
of feature identifiers as __has_feature. It evaluates to 1 if the
feature is supported by Clang in the current language (either as a
language extension or a standard language feature) or 0 if not.
At the same time, add support for the C1X feature identifiers
c_generic_selections (renamed from generic_selections) and
c_static_assert, and document them.
Patch by myself and Jean-Daniel Dupas.
llvm-svn: 131308
This introduces a generic base class for the expression evaluator
classes, which handles a few common expression types which were
previously handled separately in each class. Also, the expression
evaluator now uses ConstStmtVisitor.
llvm-svn: 131281
ConstStmtVisitor is a constness-preserving variant of StmtVisitor.
ConstStmtVisitor and StmtVisitor share an implementation using a common
base class, StmtVisitorBase, which uses a template template parameter
to build pointer types.
llvm-svn: 131280
template parameter lists to scope specifiers for friend declarations
about injected class name types. Fixes the
g++.dg/template/memfriend5.C regression in the GCC testsuite.
llvm-svn: 131272
don't build circular AST in protocol's protocol list
when user code has introduced it. Indexer and other
clients may crash. // rdar://9221614
llvm-svn: 131254
(__m128){ p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3] }
which produces really bad code. This could be done in instcombine, but it's
probably better to do it in the front-end instead.
<rdar://problem/9424836>
llvm-svn: 131237
They are actually grammatically considered definitions and parsed
accordingly.
This fixes the outstanding bugs regarding defaulting functions after
their declarations.
We now really nicely diagnose the following construct (try it!)
int foo() = delete, bar;
Still todo: Defaulted functions other than default constructors
Test cases (including for the above construct)
llvm-svn: 131228
defaulted default constructors.
As it happens, making sure that we handle out-of-line defaulted
functions properly will involved making sure that we actually parse them
correctly, so that's coming after.
llvm-svn: 131224
nested of an out-of-line declaration, only require a 'template<>'
header for each enclosing class template that hasn't been previously
specialized; previously, we were requiring 'template<>' for enclosing
class templates and members of class templates that hadn't been
previously specialized. Fixes <rdar://problem/9422013>.
llvm-svn: 131207
that they are C++0x extensions, and put them in the appropriate
group. We already support most of the semantics. Addresses
<rdar://problem/9407525>.
llvm-svn: 131153
Wait, what?
So, we run Clang (and LLVM) tests in an environment where the md5sum of the
input files becomes a component of the path. When testing the preprocessor,
the path becomes part of the output (in line directives). In this test, we
were grepping for the absence of "abc" in the output. When the stars aligned
properly, the md5sum component of the path contained "abc" and the test
failed. Oops.
llvm-svn: 131147
I've edited one diagnostic which would print "copy constructor" for copy
constructors and "constructor" for any other constructor. If anyone is
extremely enamored with this, it can be reinstated with a simple boolean
flag rather than calling getSpecialMember, which is inappropriate.
llvm-svn: 131143
the semantic context referenced by the nested-name-specifier rather
than the syntactic form of the nested-name-specifier. The previous
incarnation was based on my complete misunderstanding of C++
[temp.expl.spec]. The latest C++0x working draft clarifies the
requirements here, and this rewrite is intended to follow that.
Along the way, improve source location information in the
diagnostics. For example, if we report that a specific type needs or
doesn't need a 'template<>' header, we dig out that type in the
nested-name-specifier and highlight its range.
Fixes: PR5907, PR9421, PR8277, PR8708, PR9482, PR9668, PR9877, and
<rdar://problem/9135379>.
llvm-svn: 131138
Focus is on default constructors for the time being. Currently the
exception specification and prototype are processed correctly. Codegen
might work but in all likelihood doesn't.
Note that due to an error, out-of-line defaulting of member functions is
currently impossible. It will continue to that until I muster up the
courage to admit that I secretly pray to epimetheus and that I need to
rework the way default gets from Parse -> Sema.
llvm-svn: 131115
hasTrivialDefaultConstructor() really really means it now.
Also implement a fun standards bug regarding aggregates. Doug, if you'd
like, I can un-implement that bug if you think it is truly a defect.
The bug is that non-special-member constructors are never considered
user-provided, so the following is an aggregate:
struct foo {
foo(int);
};
It's kind of bad, but the solution isn't obvious - should
struct foo {
foo (int) = delete;
};
be an aggregate or not?
Lastly, add a missing initialization to FunctionDecl.
llvm-svn: 131101
also consider whether any of the parameter types (as written, prior to
decay) are dependent. Fixes PR9880 and <rdar://problem/9408413>.
llvm-svn: 131099
Argyrios Kyrtzidis