Commit Graph

57 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Lebedev 3adf88b746 [X86][NFC] sse41-schedule.ll: disable XOP for BdVer2 tests
Else we are clearly testing the wrong instruction.

llvm-svn: 345475
2018-10-28 13:39:06 +00:00
Roman Lebedev a5baf86744 AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
  * All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
  * Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
  They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...

To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!

# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark                                                                                        Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0607         -0.0604           234           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0630         -0.0626           233           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            +0.2581         +0.2587             1             2             1             2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0770         -0.0767           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0767         -0.0763           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            -0.4170         -0.4156             1             0             1             0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0271         -0.0270           463           450           463           450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0093         -0.0093           453           449           453           449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7280         -0.7280            13             4            13             4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0065         -0.0065           569           565           569           565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0077         -0.0077           569           564           569           564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +1.0077         +1.0068             2             5             2             5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0220          0.0199      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0006         +0.0007           312           312           312           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         +0.0031         +0.0032           311           312           311           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7069         -0.7072             4             1             4             1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0015         -0.0015           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0010         -0.0011           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1486         -0.1456             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.6139          0.8766      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0008         -0.0005            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0006         -0.0002            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1467         -0.1390             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0137          0.0137      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0002         +0.0002           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0015         -0.0014           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +3.3687         +3.3587             0             2             0             2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.4041          0.3933      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      +0.0004         +0.0004            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0000         -0.0000            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +0.1947         +0.1995             0             0             0             0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                              0.0074          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                               -0.0092         +0.0074           547           542            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                             -0.0054         +0.0115           544           541            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                             -0.4086         -0.3486             8             5             0             0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.3320          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         +0.0015         +0.0204           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                                       +0.0001         +0.0203           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +0.2259         +0.2023             1             1             0             0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       -0.0209         -0.0179            96            94            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median                                     -0.0182         -0.0155            95            93            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.6164         -0.2703             2             1             2             1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      -0.0098         -0.0098           176           175           176           175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0126         -0.0126           176           174           176           174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +6.9789         +6.9157             0             2             0             2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                 0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                  -0.0237         -0.0238           474           463           474           463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median                -0.0267         -0.0267           473           461           473           461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                +0.7179         +0.7178             3             5             3             5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                   0.6837          0.6554      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean                    -0.0014         -0.0013          1375          1373          1375          1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median                  +0.0018         +0.0019          1371          1374          1371          1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                  -0.7457         -0.7382            11             3            10             3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         -0.0080         -0.0289            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                       -0.0070         -0.0287            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +1.0977         +0.6614             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                       0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                        +0.0132         +0.0967            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                      +0.0132         +0.0956            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                      -0.0407         -0.1695             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       +0.0331         +0.1307            13            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                     +0.0430         +0.1373            12            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.9006         -0.8847             1             0             0             0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                            0.0016          0.0010      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                             -0.0023         -0.0024           395           394           395           394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median                                           -0.0029         -0.0030           395           394           395           393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                           -0.0275         -0.0375             1             1             1             1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0232          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0047         +0.0039           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0050         +0.0037           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.0599         -0.2683             1             1             0             0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                           +0.0206         +0.0207           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                         +0.0204         +0.0205           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                         +0.2155         +0.2212             1             1             1             1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                          -0.0109         -0.0108           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                        -0.0104         -0.0103           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                        -0.4919         -0.4800             0             0             0             0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0149         -0.0147           220           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0173         -0.0169           221           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        +1.0337         +1.0341             1             3             1             3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0001          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0019         -0.0019           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0021         -0.0021           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        -0.4441         -0.4282             0             0             0             0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                0.0000          0.4263      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                 +0.0258         -0.0006            81            83            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                               +0.0235         -0.0011            81            82            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                               +0.1634         +0.1070             1             1             0             0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.

llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-27 20:46:30 +00:00
Roman Lebedev a51921877a [NFC][X86] Baseline tests for AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Scheduler model
Adding the baseline tests in a preparatory NFC commit,
so that the actual commit shows the *diff*.

Yes, i'm aware that a few of these codegen-based sched tests
are testing wrong instructions, i will fix that afterwards.

For https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345462
2018-10-27 20:36:11 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 84cc110732 [X86][SSE] Update PMULDQ schedule tests to survive more aggressive SimplifyDemandedBits
llvm-svn: 345136
2018-10-24 13:13:36 +00:00
Sanjay Patel f84ece68ca [x86] make blend tests resistant to demanded elements improvements; NFC
Similar to rL343858 - we don't want these tests to lose value with D52912.

llvm-svn: 343882
2018-10-05 20:26:54 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 280af1c7f0 [X86][BtVer2] Fix PHMINPOS schedule resources typo
PHMINPOS can run on either JFPU pipe

llvm-svn: 343299
2018-09-28 08:21:39 +00:00
Clement Courbet 7db69cc08a [X86] Fix skylake server scheduling info.
Summary:
This fixes most of the scheduling info for SKX vector operations.
I had to split a lot of the YMM/ZMM classes into separate classes for YMM and ZMM.

The before/after llvm-exegesis analysis are in the phabricator diff.

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47721

llvm-svn: 334407
2018-06-11 14:37:53 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 59313be8d3 [CodeGen] assume max/default throughput for unspecified instructions
This is a fix for the problem arising in D47374 (PR37678):
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37678

We may not have throughput info because it's not specified in the model 
or it's not available with variant scheduling, so assume that those
instructions can execute/complete at max-issue-width.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47723

llvm-svn: 334055
2018-06-05 23:34:45 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 007b50fd35 [X86][BtVer2] Improve simulation of (V)PINSR values
Include the 6cy delay transferring from the GPR to FPU.

llvm-svn: 332737
2018-05-18 17:09:41 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim f7d2a93d5f [X86] Add vector element insertion/extraction scheduler classes
Split off pinsr/pextr and extractps instructions.

(Mostly) fixes PR36887.

Note: It might be worth adding a WriteFInsertLd class as well in the future.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45929

llvm-svn: 330714
2018-04-24 13:21:41 +00:00
Craig Topper 0c2a12cb3e [X86] Revert the SLM part of r328914.
While it appears to be correct information based on Intel's optimization manual and Agner's data, it causes perf regressions on a couple of the benchmarks in our internal list.

llvm-svn: 329593
2018-04-09 17:07:40 +00:00
Craig Topper c362f42b6a [X86][Znver1] Remove InstRWs for BLENDVPS/PD
Summary:
This removes the InstRWs for BLENDVPS/PD in favor of WriteFVarBlend. The latency listed was 3 cycles but WriteFVarBlend is defined as 1 cycle latency. The 1 cycle latency matches Agner Fog's data.

The patterns were missing the VEX forms which is why there are no test changes. We don't test "-mcpu=znver1 -mattr=-avx"

Reviewers: RKSimon, GGanesh

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44841

llvm-svn: 329538
2018-04-08 17:53:15 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 86588fc809 [X86][Btver2] Add vector extract costs
llvm-svn: 329524
2018-04-08 11:26:26 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 09eeb3a8b9 [X86][SandyBridge] Add (V)DPPS memory fold latencies
Noticed this during D44654

llvm-svn: 329389
2018-04-06 11:25:21 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 8a83f16ccd [X86][SandyBridge] SBWriteResPair +5cy Memory Folds
As mentioned on D44647, this patch increases the default memory latency to +5cy , which more closely matches what most custom cases are doing for reg-mem instructions.

I've bumped LoadLatency, ReadAfterLd and WriteLoad values to 5cy to be consistent.

As Sandy Bridge is currently our default generic model, this affects a lot of scheduling tests...

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44654

llvm-svn: 329388
2018-04-06 11:00:51 +00:00
Craig Topper 13a0f83a05 [X86] Add SchedRW for PMULLD
Summary:
It seems many CPUs don't implement this instruction as well as the other vector multiplies. Often using a multi uop flow. Silvermont in particular has a 7 uop flow with 11 cycle throughput. Sandy Bridge implements it as a single uop with 5 cycle latency and 1 cycle throughput. But Haswell and later use 2 uops with 10 cycle latency and 2 cycle throughput.

This patch adds a new X86SchedWritePair we can use to tag this instruction separately. I've provided correct information for Silvermont, Btver2, and Sandy Bridge. I've removed the InstRWs for SandyBridge. I've left Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake InstRWs in place because I wasn't sure how to account for the different load latency between 128 and 256 bits. I also left Znver1 InstRWs in place because the existing values don't match Agner's spreadsheet.

I also left a FIXME in the SandyBridge model because it being used for the "generic" model is too optimistic for the 256/512-bit versions since those are multiple uops on all known CPUs.

Reviewers: RKSimon, GGanesh, courbet

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: gchatelet, gbedwell, andreadb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44972

llvm-svn: 328914
2018-03-31 04:54:32 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 91fe24b8cf [X86][SSE] Ensure we're testing both non-VEX/VEX variants of SSE instructions on AVX targets
And ensure we don't use later instruction sets in SSE schedule tests

llvm-svn: 328423
2018-03-24 14:51:52 +00:00
Craig Topper 4787b7f434 [X86] Correct the latencies of SNB integer vector multiplies based on Agner's data. Add missing MMX multiplies.
llvm-svn: 328295
2018-03-23 06:41:43 +00:00
Craig Topper fae4173b47 [X86] Add VEXTRB/W/D/Q to Zen scheduler model.
The SSE versions were present, but not the VEX version.

llvm-svn: 328290
2018-03-23 06:41:36 +00:00
Craig Topper 58afb4ea58 [X86][SkylakeClient] Fix a bunch of instructions that were incorrectly assigned Port015 instead of Port01.
The VEC ADD and VEC MUL units aren't present on port 5 on SkylakeClient.

llvm-svn: 328241
2018-03-22 21:10:07 +00:00
Craig Topper d25f1acf67 [X86] Change PMULLD to 10 cycles on Skylake per Agner's tables and llvm-exegesis.
Also restrict to port 0 and 1 for SkylakeClient. It looks like the scheduler models don't account for client not having a full vector ALU on port 5 like server.

Fixes PR36808.

llvm-svn: 328061
2018-03-20 23:39:48 +00:00
Craig Topper 2330d6cd55 [X86] Fix the SNB scheduler for BLENDVB.
PBLENDVBrr0 was with the memory version of VBLENDVB and PBLENDVBrm0 was missing.

llvm-svn: 327937
2018-03-20 01:30:21 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim fb7aa57bf1 [X86][SSE] Introduce Float/Vector WriteMove, WriteLoad and Writetore scheduler classes
As discussed on D44428 and PR36726, this patch splits off WriteFMove/WriteVecMove, WriteFLoad/WriteVecLoad and WriteFStore/WriteVecStore scheduler classes to permit vectors to be handled separately from gpr/scalar types.

I've minimised the diff here by only moving various basic SSE/AVX vector instructions across - we can fix the rest when called for. This does fix the MOVDQA vs MOVAPS/MOVAPD discrepancies mentioned on D44428.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44471

llvm-svn: 327630
2018-03-15 14:45:30 +00:00
Craig Topper df99baa4df [X86] Teach EVEX->VEX pass to turn VRNDSCALE into VROUND when bits 7:4 of the immediate are 0 and the regular EVEX->VEX checks pass.
Bits 7:4 control the scale part of the operation. If the scale is 0 the behavior is equivalent to VROUND.

Fixes PR36246

llvm-svn: 324985
2018-02-13 04:19:26 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 8fb1dd8a1d [X86][SSE] Don't chain shuffles together in schedule tests
This is necessary to prevent the shuffles from being combined/simplified in an upcoming patch.

llvm-svn: 324178
2018-02-03 21:20:19 +00:00
Craig Topper 05af43fbad [X86] Fix some inconsistencies in the itineraries and Sched for (V)PEXTRW/(V)PINSRW
The weirdest being that PEXTRWrr was tagged as a memory operation.

llvm-svn: 323353
2018-01-24 17:58:57 +00:00
Craig Topper c4d2dd80b6 [X86] Add a DAG combine to combine (sext (setcc)) with VLX
Normally target independent DAG combine would do this combine based on getSetCCResultType, but with VLX getSetCCResultType returns a vXi1 type preventing the DAG combining from kicking in.

But doing this combine can allow us to remove the explicit sign extend that would otherwise be emitted.

This patch adds a target specific DAG combine to combine the sext+setcc when the result type is the same size as the input to the setcc. I've restricted this to FP compares and things that can be represented with PCMPEQ and PCMPGT since we don't have full integer compare support on the older ISAs.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41850

llvm-svn: 322101
2018-01-09 18:14:22 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 1074eb225b Reapply "[X86] Flag BroadWell scheduler model as complete"
This reverts commit r320508, in effect re-applying r320308.  Simon has already
reverted the parts that caused the crash that motivated the revert in r320492.

llvm-svn: 320512
2017-12-12 19:11:31 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 81a4a02cbc Revert "[X86] Flag BroadWell scheduler model as complete"
This reverts commit r320308.  r320308 crashes LLC, please see the llvm-commits
thread for a reproducer.

llvm-svn: 320508
2017-12-12 18:40:58 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 1f8cfba0bb [X86] Flag BroadWell scheduler model as complete
Locally tag COPY as WriteMove, which has caused some reg-reg + reg-mem instruction tests to reorder.

llvm-svn: 320308
2017-12-10 13:49:51 +00:00
Gadi Haber 2cf601f28f [X86][Haswell]: Updating the scheduling information for the Haswell subtarget.
Updated the scheduling information for the Haswell subtarget with the following changes:

Regrouped the instructions after adding appropriate load + store latencies.
Added scheduling for missing instructions such as the GATHER instrs.
The changes were made after revisiting the latencies impact of all memory uOps.

Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, craig.topper, apilipenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40021

Change-Id: Iaf6c1f5169add1552845a8a566af4e5a359217a7
llvm-svn: 320137
2017-12-08 09:48:44 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 7724b03cde [X86][SSE] Regenerate vpmovm2*/vpmov*2m avx512 schedule tests
llvm-svn: 319921
2017-12-06 18:47:37 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 25528d6de7 [CodeGen] Unify MBB reference format in both MIR and debug output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.

The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.

* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422

llvm-svn: 319665
2017-12-04 17:18:51 +00:00
Craig Topper deee24b83c [X86] Use sse_load_f32/f64 in patterns for the memory forms of VRNDSCALESS/SD.
llvm-svn: 318009
2017-11-13 02:03:01 +00:00
Craig Topper 63157c4784 [X86] Use EVEX encoded VRNDSCALE instructions to implement the legacy round intrinsics.
The VRNDSCALE instructions implement a superset of the (V)ROUND instructions. They are equivalent if the upper 4-bits of the immediate are 0.

This patch lowers the legacy intrinsics to the VRNDSCALE ISD node and masks the upper bits of the immediate to 0. This allows us to take advantage of the larger register encoding space.

We should maybe consider converting VRNDSCALE back to VROUND in the EVEX to VEX pass if the extended registers are not being used.

I notice some load folding opportunities being missed for the VRNDSCALESS/SD instructions that I'll try to fix in future patches.

llvm-svn: 318008
2017-11-13 02:03:00 +00:00
Craig Topper 0eb4a43384 [X86] Correct the execution domain on ROUND/VROUND instructions.
llvm-svn: 317968
2017-11-11 02:26:05 +00:00
Andrew V. Tischenko f8c75b8794 Sched model improving on btver2: JFPU01 resource, vtestp* for xmm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39802

llvm-svn: 317785
2017-11-09 14:19:59 +00:00
Gadi Haber 323f2e1715 [X86][Broadwell] Added the instruction scheduling information for the Broadwell CPU.
Adding the scheduling information for the Browadwell (BDW) CPU target.

This patch adds the instruction scheduling information for the Broadwell (BDW) architecture target by adding the file X86SchedBroadwell.td located under the X86 Target.
We used the scheduling information retrieved from the Broadwell architects in order to create the file.
The scheduling information includes latency, number of micro-Ops and used ports by each BDW instruction.

The patch continues the scheduling replacement and insertion effort started with the SandyBridge (SNB) target in r310792, the Haswell (HSW) target in r311879, the SkylakeClient (SKL) target in rL313613 + rL315978 and the SkylakeServer (SKX) in rL315175.

Performance fluctuations may be expected due to code alignment effects.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39054

Change-Id: If6f799e5ff60e1091c8d43b05ea78c53581bae01
llvm-svn: 316492
2017-10-24 20:19:47 +00:00
Andrew V. Tischenko 777308b548 Update DPPD/DPPS instruction scheduling on btver2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39046

llvm-svn: 316334
2017-10-23 15:53:30 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 3cb024490a [X86][SSE] Add extractps/pextrd equivalence to domain tables
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39135

llvm-svn: 316274
2017-10-21 20:19:48 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 7025b07828 [X86][SSE] Add missing extractps scheduling test
llvm-svn: 316262
2017-10-21 14:35:09 +00:00
Gadi Haber 85d99b4310 [X86][Broadwell] Added the broadwell cpu to the scheduling regression tests.<NFC>
NFC.
Added the Broadwell cpu and the BROADWELL prefix to all the scheduling regression tests, as part of prepartion for a larger commit of adding all Broadwell scheduiling.

Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, aaboud
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38994

Change-Id: I54bc9065168844c107b1729fcdc1d311ce3ea0a9
llvm-svn: 315998
2017-10-17 13:45:39 +00:00
Gadi Haber 1e0f1f476a [X86][SKL] Updated scheduling information for the SkylakeClient target
Updated the scheduling information for the SkylakeClient target with the following changes:

1. regrouped the instructions after adding load and store latencies.
2. regrouped the instructions after adding identified missing ports in several groups.
The changes were made after revisiting the latencies impact of all the load and store uOps.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38727

Change-Id: I778a308cc11e490e8fa5e27e2047412a1dca029f
llvm-svn: 315978
2017-10-17 06:47:04 +00:00
Gadi Haber 684944b822 [X86][SKX] Adding the scheduling information for the SKX target.
Adding the scheduling information for the SkylakeServer (SKX) target.

This patch adds the instruction scheduling information for the SkylakeServer (SKX) architecture target by adding the file X86SchedSkylakeServer.td located under the X86 Target.
We used the scheduling information retrieved from the Skylake architects in order to create the file.
The scheduling information includes latency, number of micro-Ops and used ports by each SKL instruction.

The patch continues the scheduling replacement and insertion effort started with the SNB target in r310792, the HSW target in r311879 and the SkylakeClient (SKL) target in rL313613.

Please expect some performance fluctuations due to code alignment effects.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon, craig.topper, chandlerc, aymanmu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38443

Change-Id: I5c228fcc09e9e5a99b6116e62b356c4f9b971185
llvm-svn: 315175
2017-10-08 12:52:54 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim a29dbdf2ca [X86][SSE] Add SKX cpu tests to SSE/AVX scheduling tests (D38443)
llvm-svn: 315061
2017-10-06 13:40:29 +00:00
Gadi Haber 6f8fbf4b86 [X86][Skylake] Adding the scheduling information for the SkylakeClient target
This patch adds the instruction scheduling information for the SkylakeClient (SKL) architecture target by adding the file X86SchedSkylakeClient.td located under the X86 Target.
We used the scheduling information retrieved from the Skylake architects in order to create the file.
The scheduling information includes latency, number of micro-Ops and used ports by each SKL instruction.
The patch continues the scheduling replacement and insertion effort started with the SNB target in r307529 and r310792 and for HSW in r311879.

Please expect some performance fluctuations due to code alignment effects.

Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi, chandlerc, igorb, aymanmus, RKSimon, delena
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37294

llvm-svn: 313613
2017-09-19 06:19:27 +00:00
Ashutosh Nema bfcac0b480 AMD family 17h (znver1) scheduler model update.
Summary:
This patch enables the following:
1) Regex based Instruction itineraries for integer instructions.
2) The instructions are grouped as per the nature of the instructions
   (move, arithmetic, logic, Misc, Control Transfer). 
3) FP instructions and their itineraries are added which includes values
   for SSE4A, BMI, BMI2 and SHA instructions.

Patch by Ganesh Gopalasubramanian

Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper

Subscribers: vprasad, shivaram, ddibyend, andreadb, javed.absar, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36617

llvm-svn: 312237
2017-08-31 12:38:35 +00:00
Gadi Haber 767d98bad8 [X86][Skylake] Fixing duplicated prefixes in the run command of Code Gen regression tests
NFC.
Replaced duplicated HASWELL prefixes in run commands in the X86 Code Gen regression tests by the SKYLAKE prefix when the -mcpu is set to skylake.
The fix is needed in preparation of an upcoming patch containing the Skylake scheduling info.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon, aymanmus, igorb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37258

llvm-svn: 312103
2017-08-30 08:08:50 +00:00
Gadi Haber d76f7b824e [X86][Haswell] Updating HSW instruction scheduling information
This patch completely replaces the instruction scheduling information for the Haswell architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedHaswell.td located under the X86 Target.
We used the scheduling information retrieved from the Haswell architects in order to replace and modify the existing scheduling.
The patch continues the scheduling replacement effort started with the SNB target in r307529 and r310792.
Information includes latency, number of micro-Ops and used ports by each HSW instruction.

Please expect some performance fluctuations due to code alignment effects.

Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, aymanmus, craig.topper, m_zuckerman, igorb, dim, chandlerc, aaboud

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36663

llvm-svn: 311879
2017-08-28 10:04:16 +00:00
Gadi Haber bed2c50607 [X86][SandyBridge] Additional updates to the SNB instructions scheduling information
This is a continuation patch for commit r307529 which completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target (see also https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019).

In this patch we added the scheduling information of additional SNB instructions that were missing from the patch commit r307529, fixed the scheduling of several resource groups that include only port0 instead of port05 (i.e., port0 OR port5) and fixed several incorrect instructions' scheduling in the r307529 commit.

The patch also includes the X87 instructions which were missing in previous patch commit r307529 as reported in bugzilla bug 34080.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon, chandlerc, igorb, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, aymanmus, dim

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36388

llvm-svn: 310792
2017-08-13 13:59:24 +00:00