location into a TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc. These were found using
a hand-written program to inspect every source location in
TemplateSpecializationTypeLocs and Valgrind. I don't know of any way to
test them in Clang's existing test suite sadly.
Example code that triggers the ElaboratedType case:
template <typename T> struct X1 {
template <typename U> struct X1_1 {
int x;
};
};
template <typename T, typename U> struct X2 {
typename X1<T>::template X1_1<U> B;
};
X2<char, int> x2;
The other fix was simply spotted by inspection. I audited all constructions of
[Dependent]TemplateSpecializationTypeLocs in TreeTransform.h, and the rest set
the TemplateNameLoc properly.
llvm-svn: 128702
the array alignment to the array access.
- This is more or less the best we can do without having alignment present in
the type system, but is a long way from truly matching how GCC handles this.
llvm-svn: 128691
Note this can potentially be enhanced to detect if the __block variable
is actually written by the block, or only when the block "escapes" or
is actually used, but that requires more analysis than it is probably worth
for this simple check.
llvm-svn: 128681
Models mempcpy() so that if length is NULL the destination pointer is returned. Otherwise, the source and destination are confirmed not to be NULL and not overlapping. Finally the copy is validated to not cause a buffer overrun and the return value is bound to the address of the byte after the last byte copied.
llvm-svn: 128677
__block object copy/dispose helpers for C++ objects with those for
different variables with completely different semantics simply because
they happen to both be no more aligned than a pointer.
Found by inspection.
Also, internalize most of the helper generation logic within CGBlocks.cpp,
and refactor it to fit my peculiar aesthetic sense.
llvm-svn: 128618
from how we process ordinary function calls, had a tremendous about of redundancy, and relied
strictly on inlining behavior (which was incomplete) to provide semantics instead of falling
back to the conservative analysis we use for C functions. This is a significant step into
making C++ analyzer support more useful.
llvm-svn: 128557
when the resolution took place due to a single template specialization
being named with an explicit template argument list. In this case, the
"resolution" doesn't take into account the target type at all, and
therefore can take place for functions, static member functions, and
*non-static* member functions. The latter weren't being properly checked
and their proper form enforced in this scenario. We now do so.
The result of this last form slipping through was some confusing logic
in IsStandardConversion handling of these resolved address-of
expressions which eventually exploded in an assert. Simplify this logic
a bit and add some more aggressive asserts to catch improperly formed
expressions getting into this routine.
Finally add systematic testing of member functions, both static and
non-static, in the various forms they can take. One of these is
essentially PR9563, and this commit fixes the crash in that PR. However,
the diagnostics for this are still pretty terrible. We at least are now
accepting the correct constructs and rejecting the invalid ones rather
than accepting invalid or crashing as before.
llvm-svn: 128456
my expertise on the template instantiation logic isn't good enough to fix this problem for real. This patch worksaround the
problem in -Wuninitialized, but we should fix it for real later.
llvm-svn: 128443
Daniel Dunbar