The regression test is reduced from the example shown in D56281.
This does raise a question as noted in the test file: do we want
to handle this pattern? I don't have a motivating example for
that on x86 yet, but it seems like we could have that pattern
there too, so we could avoid the back-and-forth using a shuffle.
llvm-svn: 351753
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This patch makes some changes related to -dag-dump-verbose.
Main use case has been when debugging how SelectionDAG is
dealing with debug info (SDDbgValue nodes).
1) We now print the number of DbgValues that are mapped to each
SDNode.
2) Removed duplicated printing of DebugLoc (nowadays DebugLoc is
printed also when not using -dag-dump-verbose).
3) Renamed SDDbgValue::dump to SDDbgValue::print, and added a
new SDDbgValue::dump that will start a new line after calling
print.
4) SDDbgValue::print now prints "Order", and it also prints
some additional information when kind is CONST/FRAMEIX/VREG.
5) SelectionDAG::dump() now dumps all SDDbgValue nodes after
the list of SDNodes (both "regular" and "ByVal" SDDbgValue:s).
Invalidated nodes are not printed.
6) Prohibit inline printing of SDNode operands that has SDDbgValue
nodes associated to them.
Reviewers: jmorse, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56793
llvm-svn: 351581
Similar to D55073. Without this change, the DAG combiner crashes on code
with more than 64k of stores in a single basic block that form parallelizable
chains.
No test case, as it would be very IR file.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56740
llvm-svn: 351571
Defer inline asm's output fixup work until after we've generated the
inline asm node itself. Remove StoresToEmit, IndirectStoresToEmit, and
RetValRegs in favor of using ConstraintOperands.
llvm-svn: 351558
This functionality is required at multiple places which potentially
create large operand lists, like SelectionDAGBuilder or DAGCombiner.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56739
llvm-svn: 351552
Summary:
Use this helper to make sure we use the same value at various places.
This will likely be needed at more places were we currently crash
because we use more operands than possible.
Also makes it easier to change in the future.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, efriedma, aemerson
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56859
llvm-svn: 351537
We should not pre-scheduled the node has ADJCALLSTACKDOWN parent,
or else, when bottom-up scheduling, ADJCALLSTACKDOWN and
ADJCALLSTACKUP may hold CallResource too long and make other
calls can't be scheduled. If there's no other available node
to schedule, the scheduler will try to rename the register by
creating copy to avoid the conflict which will fail because
CallResource is not a real physical register.
llvm-svn: 351527
Summary:
This patch supports MS SEH extensions __try/__except/__finally. The intrinsics localescape and localrecover are responsible for communicating escaped static allocas from the try block to the handler.
We need to preserve frame pointers for SEH. So we create a new function/property HasLocalEscape.
Reviewers: rnk, compnerd, mstorsjo, TomTan, efriedma, ssijaric
Reviewed By: rnk, efriedma
Subscribers: smeenai, jrmuizel, alex, majnemer, ssijaric, ehsan, dmajor, kristina, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, chrib, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53540
llvm-svn: 351370
dbg.value intrinsics can appear in blocks where their operand is not used,
meaning the operand never receives an SDNode, and thus no DBG_VALUE will
be created. Get around this by looking to see whether the operand has already
been allocated a virtual register. This allows dbg.values of Phi node and
Values that are used across basic blocks to successfully be translated into
DBG_VALUEs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56678
llvm-svn: 351358
The value returned by max() is the last valid value, adjust the
comparison accordingly.
The code added in D55073 creates TokenFactors with max() operands.
Reviewers: aemerson, efriedma, RKSimon, craig.topper
Reviewed By: aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56738
llvm-svn: 351318
ReduceLoadWidth can trigger using a shifted mask is used and this
requires that the function return a shl node to correct for the
offset. However, the way that this was implemented meant that the
returned result could be an existing node, which would be incorrect.
This fixes the method of inserting the new node and replacing uses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50432
llvm-svn: 351310
The motivating case for this is shown in the first regression test. We are
transferring to scalar and back rather than just zero-extending with 'vpmovzxdq'.
That's a special-case for a more general pattern as shown here. In all tests,
we're avoiding the vector-scalar-vector moves in favor of vector ops.
We aren't producing optimal shuffle code in some cases though, so the patch is
limited to reduce regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56281
llvm-svn: 351198
I accidentally triggered this code while doing some experiments and it doesn't look lke it could possibly work.
It calls 'getNOT' on a node that should be a CondCode.
I think to do this right we would need to swap the branch target and the fallthrough target. But that's not easy to do. Or we could create an explicit SetCC and feed that into a new BR_CC?
llvm-svn: 351022
This pattern:
t33: v8i32 = insert_subvector undef:v8i32, t35, Constant:i64<0>
t21: v16i32 = insert_subvector undef:v16i32, t33, Constant:i64<0>
...shows up in PR33758:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33758
...although this patch doesn't make any difference to the final result on that yet.
In the affected tests here, it looks like it just makes RA wiggle. But we might
as well squash this to prevent it interfering with other pattern-matching.
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56604
llvm-svn: 351008
This patch takes some of the code from D49837 to allow us to enable ISD::ABS support for all SSE vector types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56544
llvm-svn: 350998
Summary:
When legalizing the result of a SELECT_CC node by promoting the
floating-point type, use the promoted-to type rather than the original
type.
Fix PR40273.
Reviewers: efriedma, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56566
llvm-svn: 350951
That is, remove many of the calls to Type::getNumContainedTypes(),
Type::subtypes(), and Type::getContainedType(N).
I'm not intending to remove these accessors -- they are
useful/necessary in some cases. However, removing the pointee type
from pointers would potentially break some uses, and reducing the
number of calls makes it easier to audit.
llvm-svn: 350835
This removes check for single use from general ShrinkDemandedConstant
to the BE because of the AArch64 regression after D56289/rL350475.
After several hours of experiments I did not come up with a testcase
failing on any other targets if check is not performed.
Moreover, direct call to ShrinkDemandedConstant is not really needed
and superceed by SimplifyDemandedBits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56406
llvm-svn: 350684
As we saw in D56057 when we tried to use this function on X86, it's unsafe. It allows the operand node to have multiple users, but doesn't prevent recursing past the first node when it does have multiple users. This can cause other simplifications earlier in the graph without regard to what bits are needed by the other users of the first node. Ideally all we should do to the first node if it has multiple uses is bypass it when its not needed by the user we started from. Doing any other transformation that SimplifyDemandedBits can do like turning ZEXT/SEXT into AEXT would result in an increase in instructions.
Fortunately, we already have a function that can do just that, GetDemandedBits. It will only make transformations that involve bypassing a node.
This patch changes AMDGPU's simplifyI24, to use a combination of GetDemandedBits to handle the multiple use simplifications. And then uses the regular SimplifyDemandedBits on each operand to handle simplifications allowed when the operand only has a single use. Unfortunately, GetDemandedBits simplifies constants more aggressively than SimplifyDemandedBits. This caused the -7 constant in the changed test to be simplified to remove the upper bits. I had to modify computeKnownBits to account for this by ignoring the upper 8 bits of the input.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56087
llvm-svn: 350560
The FSHL/FSHR nodes are handled in the expand function, but they need to also be listed in the code that queries for the operation action too.
llvm-svn: 350490
Fixes cvt_f32_ubyte combine. performCvtF32UByteNCombine() could shrink
source node to demanded bits only even if there are other uses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56289
llvm-svn: 350475
This adds support for calculating sign bits of insert_subvector. I based it on the computeKnownBits.
My motivating case is propagating sign bits information across basic blocks on AVX targets where concatenating using insert_subvector is common.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56283
llvm-svn: 350432
As noted in PR39973 and D55558:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39973
...this is a partial implementation of a fold that we do as an IR canonicalization in instcombine:
// extelt (binop X, Y), Index --> binop (extelt X, Index), (extelt Y, Index)
We want to have this in the DAG too because as we can see in some of the test diffs (reductions),
the pattern may not be visible in IR.
Given that this is already an IR canonicalization, any backend that would prefer a vector op over
a scalar op is expected to already have the reverse transform in DAG lowering (not sure if that's
a realistic expectation though). The transform is limited with a TLI hook because there's an
existing transform in CodeGenPrepare that tries to do the opposite transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55722
llvm-svn: 350354
Currently we expand the two nodes separately. This gives DAG combiner an opportunity to optimize the expanded sequence taking into account only one set of users. When we expand the other node we'll create the expansion again, but might not be able to optimize it the same way. So the nodes won't CSE and we'll have two similarish sequences in the same basic block. By expanding both nodes at the same time we'll avoid prematurely optimizing the expansion until both the division and remainder have been replaced.
Improves the test case from PR38217. There may be additional opportunities after this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56145
llvm-svn: 350239
By also promoting the input type we get a better idea for what scalar type to use. This can provide better results if the result of the extract is sign extended. What was previously happening is that the extract result would be legalized, sometime later the input of the sign extend would be legalized using the result of the extract. Then later the extract input would be legalized forcing a truncate into the input of the sign extend using a replace all uses. This requires DAG combine to combine out the sext/truncate pair. But sometimes we visited the truncate first and messed things up before the sext could be combined.
By creating the extract with the correct scalar type when we create legalize the result type, the truncate will be added right away. Then when the sign_extend input is legalized it will create an any_extend of the truncate which can be optimized by getNode to maybe remove the truncate. And then a sign_extend_inreg. Now DAG combine doesn't have to worry about getting rid of the extend.
This fixes the regression on X86 in D56156.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56176
llvm-svn: 350236
If x has multiple sign bits than it doesn't matter which one we extend from so we can sext from x's msb instead.
The X86 setcc-combine.ll changes are a little weird. It appears we ended up with a (sext_inreg (aext (trunc (extractelt)))) after type legalization. The sext_inreg+aext now gets optimized by this combine to leave (sext (trunc (extractelt))). Then we visit the trunc before we visit the sext. This ends up changing the truncate to an extractvectorelt from a bitcasted vector. I have a follow up patch to fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56156
llvm-svn: 350235
default
During the lowering of a switch that would result in the generation of a jump
table, a range check is performed before indexing into the jump table, for the
switch value being outside the jump table range and a conditional branch is
inserted to jump to the default block. In case the default block is
unreachable, this conditional jump can be omitted. This patch implements
omitting this conditional branch for unreachable defaults.
Review Reference: D52002
llvm-svn: 350186
The patch adds a possibility to make library calls on NVPTX.
An important thing about library functions - they must be defined within
the current module. This basically should guarantee that we produce a
valid PTX assembly (without calls to not defined functions). The one who
wants to use the libcalls is probably will have to link against
compiler-rt or any other implementation.
Currently, it's completely impossible to make library calls because of
error LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: i32 = ExternalSymbol '...'. But we can
lower ExternalSymbol to TargetExternalSymbol and verify if the function
definition is available.
Also, there was an issue with a DAG during legalisation. When we expand
instruction into libcall, the inner call-chain isn't being "integrated"
into outer chain. Since the last "data-flow" (call retval load) node is
located in call-chain earlier than CALLSEQ_END node, the latter becomes
a leaf and therefore a dead node (and is being removed quite fast).
Proposed here solution relies on another data-flow pseudo nodes
(ProxyReg) which purpose is only to keep CALLSEQ_END at legalisation and
instruction selection phases - we remove the pseudo instructions before
register scheduling phase.
Patch by Denys Zariaiev!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34708
llvm-svn: 350069
This is an alternative to what I attempted in D56057.
GetDemandedBits is a special version of SimplifyDemandedBits that allows simplifications even when the operand has other uses. GetDemandedBits will only do simplifications that allow a node to be bypassed. It won't create new nodes or alter any of the other users.
I had to add support for bypassing SIGN_EXTEND_INREG to GetDemandedBits.
Based on a patch that Simon Pilgrim sent me in email.
Fixes PR40142.
llvm-svn: 350059
More migration so we can disable the implicit int -> LocationSize
conversion.
All of these are either scatter/gather'ed vector instructions, or direct
loads. Hence, they're all precise.
Perhaps if we see way more getTypeStoreSize calls, we can make a
getTypeStoreLocationSize (or similar) as a wrapper that applies this
::precise. Doesn't appear that it's a good idea to make getTypeStoreSize
return a LocationSize itself, however.
llvm-svn: 350042
It's dangerous to knowingly create an illegal vector type
no matter what stage of combining we're in.
This prevents the missed folding/scalarization seen in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40146
llvm-svn: 350034
trunc (add X, C ) --> add (trunc X), C'
If we're throwing away the top bits of an 'add' instruction, do it in the narrow destination type.
This makes the truncate-able opcode list identical to the sibling transform done in IR (in instcombine).
This change used to show regressions for x86, but those are gone after D55494.
This gets us closer to deleting the x86 custom function (combineTruncatedArithmetic)
that does almost the same thing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55866
llvm-svn: 350006
This saves materializing the immediate. The additional forms are less
common (they don't usually show up for bitfield insert/extract), but
they're still relevant.
I had to add a new target hook to prevent DAGCombine from reversing the
transform. That isn't the only possible way to solve the conflict, but
it seems straightforward enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55630
llvm-svn: 349857
This patch enables funnel shift -> rotate building for all ROTL/ROTR custom/legal operations.
AFAICT X86 was the last target that was missing modulo support (PR38243), but I've tried to CC stakeholders for every target that has ROTL/ROTR custom handling for their final OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55747
llvm-svn: 349765
Now that SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyDemandedVectorElts is simplifying vector elements, we're seeing more constant BUILD_VECTOR containing undefs.
This patch provides opt-in support for UNDEF elements in matchBinaryPredicate, passing NULL instead of the result ConstantSDNode* argument.
I've updated the (or (and X, c1), c2) -> (and (or X, c2), c1|c2) fold to demonstrate its use, which I believe is safe for undef cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55822
llvm-svn: 349629
Now that SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyDemandedVectorElts is simplifying vector elements, we're seeing more constant BUILD_VECTOR containing undefs.
This patch provides opt-in support for UNDEF elements in matchBinaryPredicate, passing NULL instead of the result ConstantSDNode* argument.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55822
llvm-svn: 349628
As described on PR40091, we have several places where zext (and zext_vector_inreg) fold an undef input into an undef output. For zero extensions this is incorrect as the output should guarantee to least have the new upper bits set to zero.
SimplifyDemandedVectorElts is the worst offender (and its the most likely to cause new undefs to appear) but DAGCombiner's tryToFoldExtendOfConstant has a similar issue.
Thanks to @dmgreen for catching this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55883
llvm-svn: 349625
Now that SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyDemandedVectorElts are simplifying vector elements, we're seeing more constant BUILD_VECTOR containing UNDEFs.
This patch provides opt-in handling of UNDEF elements in matchUnaryPredicate, passing NULL instead of the ConstantSDNode* argument.
I've updated SelectionDAG::simplifyShift to demonstrate its use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55819
llvm-svn: 349616
SelectionDAG currently changes these intrinsics to function calls, but that won't work
for other ISel's. Also we want to eventually support nonlazybind and weak linkage coming
from the front-end which we can't do in SelectionDAG.
llvm-svn: 349552
For opcodes not covered by SimplifyDemandedVectorElts, SimplifyDemandedBits might be able to help now that it supports demanded elts as well.
llvm-svn: 349466
The assertion type is always supposed to be a scalar type. So if the result VT of the assertion is a vector, we need to get the scalar VT before we can compare them.
Similarly for the assert above it.
I don't have a test case because I don't know of any place we violate this today. A coworker found this while trying to use r347287 on the 6.0 branch without also having r336868
llvm-svn: 349390
This is an initial patch to add the necessary support for a DemandedElts argument to SimplifyDemandedBits, more closely matching computeKnownBits and to help improve vector codegen.
I've added only a small amount of the changes necessary to get at least one test to update - a lot more can be done but I'd like to add these methodically with proper test coverage, at the same time the hope is to slowly move some/all of SimplifyDemandedVectorElts into SimplifyDemandedBits as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55768
llvm-svn: 349374
We keep a few iterators into the basic block we're selecting while
performing FastISel. Usually this is fine, but occasionally code wants
to remove already-emitted instructions. When this happens we have to be
careful to update those iterators so they're not pointint at dangling
memory.
llvm-svn: 349365
The transform performs a bitwise logic op in a wider type followed by
truncate when both inputs are truncated from the same source type:
logic_op (truncate x), (truncate y) --> truncate (logic_op x, y)
There are a bunch of other checks that should prevent doing this when
it might be harmful.
We already do this transform for scalars in this spot. The vector
limitation was shared with a check for the case when the operands are
extended. I'm not sure if that limit is needed either, but that would
be a separate patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55448
llvm-svn: 349303
Also exposes an issue in DAGCombiner::visitFunnelShift where we were assuming the shift amount had the result type (after legalization it'll have the targets shift amount type).
llvm-svn: 349298
Summary:
If the setcc already has the target desired type we can reach the getSetCC/getSExtOrTrunc after the MatchingVecType check with the exact same types as the nodes we started with. This causes those causes VsetCC to be CSEd to N0 and the getSExtOrTrunc will CSE to N. When we return N, the caller will think that meant we called CombineTo and did our own worklist management. But that's not what happened. This prevents target hooks from being called for the node.
To fix this, I've now returned SDValue if the setcc is already the desired type. But to avoid some regressions in X86 I've had to disable one of the target combines that wasn't being reached before in the case of a (sext (setcc)). If we get vector widening legalization enabled that entire function will be deleted anyway so hopefully this is only for the short term.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55459
llvm-svn: 349137
This isn't quite NFC, but I don't know how to expose
any outward diffs from these changes. Mostly, this
was confusing because it used 'VT' to refer to the
operand type rather the usual type of the input node.
There's also a large block at the end that is dedicated
solely to matching loads, but that wasn't obvious. This
could probably be split up into separate functions to
make it easier to see.
It's still not clear to me when we make certain transforms
because the legality and constant conditions are
intertwined in a way that might be improved.
llvm-svn: 349095
This is a retry of rL349051 (reverted at rL349056). I changed the check for dead-ness from
number of uses to an opcode test for DELETED_NODE based on existing similar code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55655
llvm-svn: 349058
Move existing rotation expansion code into TargetLowering and set it up for vectors as well.
Ideally this would share more of the funnel shift expansion, but we handle the shift amount modulo quite differently at the moment.
Begun removing x86 vector rotate custom lowering to use the expansion.
llvm-svn: 349025
Summary:
All targets either just return false here or properly model `Fast`, so I
don't think there is any reason to prevent CodeGen from doing the right
thing here.
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55365
llvm-svn: 349016
This patch introduces a generic function to determine whether a given vector type is known to be a splat value for the specified demanded elements, recursing up the DAG looking for BUILD_VECTOR or VECTOR_SHUFFLE splat patterns.
It also keeps track of the elements that are known to be UNDEF - it returns true if all the demanded elements are UNDEF (as this may be useful under some circumstances), so this needs to be handled by the caller.
A wrapper variant is also provided that doesn't take the DemandedElts or UndefElts arguments for cases where we just want to know if the SDValue is a splat or not (with/without UNDEFS).
I had hoped to completely remove the X86 local version of this function, but I'm seeing some regressions in shift/rotate codegen that will take a little longer to fix and I hope to get this in sooner so I can continue work on PR38243 which needs more capable splat detection.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55426
llvm-svn: 348953
If either of the operand elements are zero then we know the result element is going to be zero (even if the other element is undef).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55558
llvm-svn: 348926
Add an intrinsic that takes 2 signed integers with the scale of them provided
as the third argument and performs fixed point multiplication on them.
This is a part of implementing fixed point arithmetic in clang where some of
the more complex operations will be implemented as intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54719
llvm-svn: 348912
Summary:
All targets either just return false here or properly model `Fast`, so I
don't think there is any reason to prevent CodeGen from doing the right
thing here.
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55365
llvm-svn: 348843
If all the demanded elements of the SimplifyDemandedVectorElts are known to be UNDEF, we can simplify to an ISD::UNDEF node.
Zero constant folding will be handled in a future patch - its a little trickier as we often have bitcasted zero values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55511
llvm-svn: 348784
As discussed on D55511, this caused an issue if the inner node deletes a node that the outer node depends upon. As it doesn't affect any lit-tests and I've only been able to expose this with the D55511 change I'm committing this now.
llvm-svn: 348781
This triggers an assert when combining concat_vectors of a bitcast of
merge_values.
With asserts disabled, it fails to select:
fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: 0x7ff19d000e90: i32 = any_extend 0x7ff19d000ae8
0x7ff19d000ae8: f64,ch = CopyFromReg 0x7ff19d000c20:1, Register:f64 %1
0x7ff19d000b50: f64 = Register %1
In function: d
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55507
llvm-svn: 348759
Currently, dbg.value's of "nullptr" are dropped when entering a SelectionDAG --
apparently just because of an oversight when recognising Values that are
constant (see PR39787). This patch adds ConstantPointerNull to the list of
constants that can be turned into DBG_VALUEs.
The matter of what bit-value a null pointer constant in LLVM has was raised
in this mailing list thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-December/128234.html
Where it transpires LLVM relies on (IR) null pointers being zero valued,
thus I've baked this assumption into the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55227
llvm-svn: 348753
Sanjay Patel