Prior to this patch, each basic block listed in the extrack-blocks-file
would be extracted to a different function.
This patch adds the support for comma separated list of basic blocks
to form group.
When the region formed by a group is not extractable, e.g., not single
entry, all the blocks of that group are left untouched.
Let us see this new format in action (comments are not part of the
file format):
;; funcName bbName[,bbName...]
foo bb1 ;; Extract bb1 in its own function
foo bb2,bb3 ;; Extract bb2,bb3 in their own function
bar bb1,bb4 ;; Extract bb1,bb4 in their own function
bar bb2 ;; Extract bb2 in its own function
Assuming all regions are extractable, this will create one function and
thus one call per region.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60746
llvm-svn: 358701
The bug is that I didn't check whether the operand of the invariant_loads were themselves invariant. I don't know how this got missed in the patch and review. I even had an unreduced test case locally, and I remember handling this case, but I must have lost it in one of the rebases. Oops.
llvm-svn: 358688
The purpose of this patch is to eliminate a pass ordering dependence between LoopPredication and LICM. To understand the purpose, consider the following snippet of code inside some loop 'L' with IV 'i'
A = _a.length;
guard (i < A)
a = _a[i]
B = _b.length;
guard (i < B);
b = _b[i];
...
Z = _z.length;
guard (i < Z)
z = _z[i]
accum += a + b + ... + z;
Today, we need LICM to hoist the length loads, LoopPredication to make the guards loop invariant, and TrivialUnswitch to eliminate the loop invariant guard to establish must execute for the next length load. Today, if we can't prove speculation safety, we'd have to iterate these three passes 26 times to reduce this example down to the minimal form.
Using the fact that the array lengths are known to be invariant, we can short circuit this iteration. By forming the loop invariant form of all the guards at once, we remove the need for LoopPredication from the iterative cycle. At the moment, we'd still have to iterate LICM and TrivialUnswitch; we'll leave that part for later.
As a secondary benefit, this allows LoopPred to expose peeling oppurtunities in a much more obvious manner. See the udiv test changes as an example. If the udiv was not hoistable (i.e. we couldn't prove speculation safety) this would be an example where peeling becomes obviously profitable whereas it wasn't before.
A couple of subtleties in the implementation:
- SCEV's isSafeToExpand guarantees speculation safety (i.e. let's us expand at a new point). It is not a precondition for expansion if we know the SCEV corresponds to a Value which dominates the requested expansion point.
- SCEV's isLoopInvariant returns true for expressions which compute the same value across all iterations executed, regardless of where the original Value is located. (i.e. it can be in the loop) This implies we have a speculation burden to prove before expanding them outside loops.
- invariant_loads and AA->pointsToConstantMemory are two cases that SCEV currently does not handle, but meets the SCEV definition of invariance. I plan to sink this part into SCEV once this has baked for a bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60093
llvm-svn: 358684
Reverse the checking of the domiance order so that when a self compare happens,
it returns false. This makes compare function have strict weak ordering.
llvm-svn: 358636
This patch adds a basic loop fusion pass. It will fuse loops that conform to the
following 4 conditions:
1. Adjacent (no code between them)
2. Control flow equivalent (if one loop executes, the other loop executes)
3. Identical bounds (both loops iterate the same number of iterations)
4. No negative distance dependencies between the loop bodies.
The pass does not make any changes to the IR to create opportunities for fusion.
Instead, it checks if the necessary conditions are met and if so it fuses two
loops together.
The pass has not been added to the pass pipeline yet, and thus is not enabled by
default. It can be run stand alone using the -loop-fusion option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55851
llvm-svn: 358607
In InstCombine, we use an idiom of "store i1 true, i1 undef" to indicate we've found a path which we've proven unreachable. We can't actually insert the unreachable instruction since that would require changing the CFG. We leave that to simplifycfg later.
This just factors out that idiom creation so we don't duplicate the same mostly undocument idiom creation in multiple places.
llvm-svn: 358600
Summary:
In the following cases, unrolling can be beneficial, even when
optimizing for code size:
1) very low trip counts
2) potential to constant fold most instructions after fully unrolling.
We can unroll in those cases, by setting the unrolling threshold to the
loop size. This might highlight some cost modeling issues and fixing
them will have a positive impact in general.
Reviewers: vsk, efriedma, dmgreen, paquette
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60265
llvm-svn: 358586
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
This patch adds a basic loop fusion pass. It will fuse loops that conform to the
following 4 conditions:
1. Adjacent (no code between them)
2. Control flow equivalent (if one loop executes, the other loop executes)
3. Identical bounds (both loops iterate the same number of iterations)
4. No negative distance dependencies between the loop bodies.
The pass does not make any changes to the IR to create opportunities for fusion.
Instead, it checks if the necessary conditions are met and if so it fuses two
loops together.
The pass has not been added to the pass pipeline yet, and thus is not enabled by
default. It can be run stand alone using the -loop-fusion option.
Phabricator: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55851
llvm-svn: 358543
This is 1 of the problems discussed in the post-commit thread for:
rL355741 / http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190311/635516.html
and filed as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41101
Instcombine tries to canonicalize some of these cases (and there's room for improvement
there independently of this patch), but it can't always do that because of extra uses.
So we need to recognize these commuted operand patterns here in EarlyCSE. This is similar
to how we detect commuted compares and commuted min/max/abs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60723
llvm-svn: 358523
If a umul.with.overflow or smul.with.overflow operation cannot
overflow, simplify it to a simple mul nuw / mul nsw. After the
refactoring in D60668 this is just a matter of removing an
explicit check against multiplications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60791
llvm-svn: 358521
This is a refactoring patch which should have all the functionality of the current code. Its goal is twofold:
i. Cleanup and simplify the reordering code, and
ii. Generalize reordering so that it will work for an arbitrary number of operands, not just 2.
This is the second patch in a series of patches that will enable operand reordering across chains of operations. An example of this was presented in EuroLLVM'18 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIEn34LvyNo .
Committed on behalf of @vporpo (Vasileios Porpodas)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59973
llvm-svn: 358519
If a constant shift amount is used, then only some of the LHS/RHS
operand bits are demanded and we may be able to simplify based on
that. InstCombineSimplifyDemanded already had the necessary support
for that, we just weren't calling it with fshl/fshr as root.
In particular, this allows us to relax some masked funnel shifts
into simple shifts, as shown in the tests.
Patch by Shawn Landden.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60660
llvm-svn: 358515
This adds a WithOverflowInst class with a few helper methods to get
the underlying binop, signedness and nowrap type and makes use of it
where sensible. There will be two more uses in D60650/D60656.
The refactorings are all NFC, though I left some TODOs where things
could be improved. In particular we have two places where add/sub are
handled but mul isn't.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60668
llvm-svn: 358512
The original commit caused false positives from AddressSanitizer's
use-after-scope checks, which have now been fixed in r358478.
> The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
> one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
> we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
>
> That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
> "instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
> the need to special-case stores.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 358483
If there are any intrinsics that cannot be traced back to an alloca, we
might have missed the start of a variable's scope, leading to false
error reports if the variable is poisoned at function entry. Instead, if
there are some intrinsics that can't be traced, fail safe and don't
poison the variables in that function.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60686
llvm-svn: 358478
The CodeExtractor is not smart enough to compute which basic block is
the entry of a region. Instead it relies on the order of the list
of basic blocks that is handed to it and assumes that the entry
is the first block in the list.
Without the additional debug information, it is hard to understand
why a valid region does not get extracted, because we would miss
that the order of in the list just doesn't match what the CodeExtractor
wants.
NFC
llvm-svn: 358471
If LSR split critical edge during rewriting phi operands and
phi node has other pending fixup operands, we need to
update those pending fixups. Otherwise formulae will not be
implemented completely and some instructions will not be eliminated.
llvm.org/PR41445
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60645
Patch by: Denis Bakhvalov <denis.bakhvalov@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 358457
This is a preparatory patch for D60093. This patch itself is NFC, but while preparing this I noticed and committed a small hoisting change in rL358419.
The basic structure of the new scheme is that we pass around the guard ("the using instruction"), and select an optimal insert point by examining operands at each construction point. This seems conceptually a bit cleaner to start with as it isolates the knowledge about insertion safety at the actual insertion point.
Note that the non-hoisting path is not actually used at the moment. That's not exercised until D60093 is rebased on this one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60718
llvm-svn: 358434
Zexts can be treated like no-op casts when it comes to assessing whether their
removal affects debug info.
Reviewer: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60641
llvm-svn: 358431
Summary:
Enable some of the existing size optimizations for cold code under PGO.
A ~5% code size saving in big internal app under PGO.
The way it gets BFI/PSI is discussed in the RFC thread
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-March/130894.html
Note it doesn't currently touch loop passes.
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman
Reviewed By: eraman
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, smeenai, mehdi_amini, eraman, zzheng, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59514
llvm-svn: 358422
If we have multiple range checks which can be predicated, hoist the and of the results outside the loop. This minorly cleans up the resulting IR, but the main motivation is as a building block for D60093.
llvm-svn: 358419
Summary:
Factor out findAllocaForValue() from ASan so that we can use it in
MSan to handle lifetime intrinsics.
Reviewers: eugenis, pcc
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60615
llvm-svn: 358380
* Rearrange continu/break
* BBNumbers.lookup(A) -> BBNumbers.find(A)->second
BBNumbers has been computed, thus we can assume the value exists in the predicate.
llvm-svn: 358351
As pointed out in D60518 folding mulo(%x, undef) to {undef, undef}
isn't correct. As a correct version of this already exists in
InstructionSimplify (bd8056ef32/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp (L4750-L4757)) this is just
dead code though. Drop it together with the mul(%x, 0) -> {0, false}
fold that is also already handled by InstSimplify.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60649
llvm-svn: 358339
Summary:
Create a method to forget everything in SCEV.
Add a cl::opt and PassManagerBuilder option to use this in LoopUnroll.
Motivation: Certain Halide applications spend a very long time compiling in forgetLoop, and prefer to forget everything and rebuild SCEV from scratch.
Sample difference in compile time reduction: 21.04 to 14.78 using current ToT release build.
Testcase showcasing this cannot be opensourced and is fairly large.
The option disabled by default, but it may be desirable to enable by
default. Evidence in favor (two difference runs on different days/ToT state):
File Before (s) After (s)
clang-9.bc 7267.91 6639.14
llvm-as.bc 194.12 194.12
llvm-dis.bc 62.50 62.50
opt.bc 1855.85 1857.53
File Before (s) After (s)
clang-9.bc 8588.70 7812.83
llvm-as.bc 196.20 194.78
llvm-dis.bc 61.55 61.97
opt.bc 1739.78 1886.26
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jlebar, zzheng, javed.absar, dmgreen, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60144
llvm-svn: 358304
This fixes a miscompile which was introduced in r356510 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D57372).
The problem is that the original patch removed pointer operands where the load results we're demanded, but without considering the legality of the load itself. If the masked.gather had active, but undemanded, lanes, then we could end up creating a load which loaded from an undef address. The result could be a segfault, or, in theory, an arbitrary read from a random memory location into an used register.
llvm-svn: 358299
When CVP determines that a with.overflow intrinsic cannot overflow,
it currently inserts a simple add/sub. As we already determined that
there can be no overflow, we should add the appropriate NUW/NSW flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60585
llvm-svn: 358298
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41175
In the bug test case the DSE pass is shortening the range of memory that a
memset is working on. A getelementptr is generated so that the new
starting address can be passed to memset. This instruction was not given
a DebugLoc.
To fix the bug, copy the DebugLoc from the memset instruction.
Patch by Orlando Cazalet-Hyams!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60556
llvm-svn: 358270
We currently assume profile hash conflicts will be caught by an upfront
check and we assert for the cases that escape the check. The assumption
is not always true as there are chances of conflict. This patch prints
a warning and skips annotating the function for the escaped cases,.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60154
llvm-svn: 358225
Following D60483 and D60497, this adds support for AlwaysOverflows
handling for ssubo. This is the last case we can handle right now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60518
llvm-svn: 358100
ssubo X, C is equivalent to saddo X, -C. Make the transformation in
InstCombine and allow the logic implemented for saddo to fold prior
usages of add nsw or sub nsw with constants.
Patch by Dan Robertson.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60061
llvm-svn: 358099
1. Use computed VF for stress testing.
2. If the computed VF does not produce vector code (VF smaller than 2), force VF to be 4.
3. Test vectorization of i64 data on AArch64 to make sure we generate VF != 4 (on X86 that was already tested on AVX).
Patch by Francesco Petrogalli <francesco.petrogalli@arm.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59952
llvm-svn: 358056
Check AlwaysOverflow condition for usubo. The implementation is the
same as the existing handling for uaddo and umulo. Handling for saddo
and ssubo will follow (smulo doesn't have the necessary ValueTracking
support).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60483
llvm-svn: 358052
metadata into a module flag in the auto-upgrader and make the ARC
contract pass read the marker as a module flag.
This is needed to fix a bug where ARC contract wasn't inserting the
retainRV marker when LTO was enabled, which caused objects returned
from a function to be auto-released.
rdar://problem/49464214
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60303
llvm-svn: 358047
This reverts commit 1383a91689.
sdiv-canonicalize.ll fails after this revision. The fold needs to be
moved outside the branch handling constant operands. However when this
is done there are further test changes, so I'm reverting this in the
meantime.
llvm-svn: 358026
Change the code to always handle the unsigned+signed cases together
with the same basic structure for add/sub/mul. The simple folds are
always handled first and then the ValueTracking overflow checks are
used.
llvm-svn: 358025
Similar to:
rL358005
Forego folding arbitrary vector constants to fix a possible miscompile bug.
We can enhance the transform if we do want to handle the more complicated
vector case.
llvm-svn: 358013
// 0 - (X sdiv C) -> (X sdiv -C) provided the negation doesn't overflow.
This fold has been around for many years and nobody noticed the potential
vector miscompile from overflow until recently...
So it seems unlikely that there's much demand for a vector sdiv optimization
on arbitrary vector constants, so just limit the matching to splat constants
to avoid the possible bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60426
llvm-svn: 358005
It's been on in Android for a while without causing problems, so it's time
to make it the default and remove the flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60355
llvm-svn: 357960
A more general canonicalization between fdiv and fmul would not
handle this case because that would have to be limited by uses
to prevent 2 values from becoming 3 values:
(x/y) * (x/y) --> (x*x) / (y*y)
(But we probably should still have that limited -- but more general --
canonicalization independently of this change.)
llvm-svn: 357943
Fixes bug 40992: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40992
There is potential for miscompiled code emitted from JumpThreading when
analyzing a block with one or more indirectbr or callbr predecessors. The
ProcessThreadableEdges() function incorrectly folds conditional branches
into an unconditional branch.
This patch prevents incorrect branch folding without fully pessimizing
other potential threading opportunities through the same basic block.
This IR shape was manually fed in via opt and is unclear if clang and the
full pass pipeline will ever emit similar code shapes.
Thanks to Matthias Liedtke for the bug report and simplified IR example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60284
llvm-svn: 357930
First step towards removing the MOVMSK intrinsics completely - this patch expands MOVMSK to the pattern:
e.g. PMOVMSKB(v16i8 x):
%cmp = icmp slt <16 x i8> %x, zeroinitializer
%int = bitcast <16 x i8> %cmp to i16
%res = zext i16 %int to i32
Which is correctly handled by ISel and FastIsel (give or take an annoying movzx move....): https://godbolt.org/z/rkrSFW
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60256
llvm-svn: 357909
This revision causes tests to fail under ASAN. Since the cause of the failures
is not clear (could be ASAN, could be a Clang bug, could be a bug in this
revision), the safest course of action seems to be to revert while investigating.
llvm-svn: 357667
Create method `optForNone()` testing for the function level equivalent of
`-O0` and refactor appropriately.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59852
llvm-svn: 357638
The Emscripten OS provides a definition of __EMSCRIPTEN__, and also that it
supports iprintf optimizations.
Also define small_printf optimizations, which is a printf with float support
but not long double (which in wasm can be useful since long doubles are 128
bit and force linking of float128 emulation code). This part is based on
sunfish's https://reviews.llvm.org/D57620 (which can't land yet since
the WASI integration isn't ready yet).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60167
llvm-svn: 357552
Set the correct debug location on instructions which load arguments in
preparation for a call to an arg-promoted function.
This prevents location cascade from misattributing the line/scope of one
of these loads to the location of the instruction preceding the call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60113
llvm-svn: 357500
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41180
In the bug test case the debug location was missing for the cmp instruction in
the "middle block" BB. This patch fixes the bug by copying the debug location
from the cmp of the scalar loop's terminator branch, if it exists.
The patch also fixes the debug location on the subsequent branch instruction.
It was previously using the location of the of the original loop's pre-header
block terminator. Both of these instructions will now map to the source line of
the conditional branch in the original loop.
A regression test has been added that covers these issues.
Patch by Orlando Cazalet-Hyams!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59944
llvm-svn: 357499
Summary:
When inserting an `unreachable` after a noreturn call, we must ensure
that it's not a musttail call to avoid breaking the IR invariants for
musttail calls.
Reviewers: fedor.sergeev, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60080
llvm-svn: 357485
Summary: It is possible that multiple indirect call targets have been promoted for a single callsite from the profiled binary. Current implementation repeats promotion for all these targets as far as the callsite itself is hot (the callsite is assumed to be hot if any one of these targets was "hot" during the profiling). However, even when one of the ICPed target is hot other targets may not, and we should not repeat promotion for "cold" targets.
Reviewers: danielcdh, wmi
Subscribers: hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59940
llvm-svn: 357484
Summary:
When inserting an `unreachable` after a noreturn call, we must ensure
that it's not a musttail call to avoid breaking the IR invariants for
musttail calls.
Reviewers: fedor.sergeev, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60079
llvm-svn: 357483
`StoreInst::getValueOperand` is identical to `getOperand(0)`, so the call to
`getOperand(0)` can be replaced. Further, `SI->getValueOperand` is redundantly
called just a few lines down, despite its return value being stored in variable
`DV`. No functional change.
llvm-svn: 357479
The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
"instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
the need to special-case stores.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 357452
The code doesn't actually need any of the information about the widenable condition at this level. The only thing we need is to ensure the WC call is the last thing anded in, and even that is a quirk we should really look to remove.
llvm-svn: 357448
We'd been optimizing the case where the predicate was obviously true, do the same for the false case. Mostly just for completeness sake, but also may improve compile time in loops which will exit through the guard. Such loops are presumed rare in fastpath code, but may be present down untaken paths, so optimizing for them is still useful.
llvm-svn: 357408
LoopPredication was replacing the original condition, but leaving the instructions to compute the old conditions around. This would get cleaned up by other passes of course, but we might as well do it eagerly. That also makes the test output less confusing.
llvm-svn: 357406
Summary:
This fixes PR41270.
The recursive function evaluateInDifferentElementOrder expects to be called
on a vector Value, so when we call it on a vector GEP's arguments, we must
first check that the argument is indeed a vector.
Reviewers: reames, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60058
llvm-svn: 357389
This reverts commit 75216a6dbcfe5fb55039ef06a07e419fa875f4a5.
I'll recommit with a better commit message with reference to the
phabricator review.
llvm-svn: 357387
This fixes PR41270.
The recursive function evaluateInDifferentElementOrder expects to be called
on a vector Value, so when we call it on a vector GEP's arguments, we must
first check that the argument is indeed a vector.
llvm-svn: 357385
If we have a commutable vector binop with inverted select-shuffles,
we don't care about the order of the operands in each vector lane:
LHS = shuffle V1, V2, <0, 5, 6, 3>
RHS = shuffle V2, V1, <0, 5, 6, 3>
LHS + RHS --> <V1[0]+V2[0], V2[1]+V1[1], V2[2]+V1[2], V1[3]+V2[3]> --> V1 + V2
PR41304:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41304
...is currently titled as an SLP enhancement, but at least for the
given example, we can reduce that in instcombine because we are just
eliminating shuffles.
As noted in the TODO, this could be generalized, but I haven't thought
through those patterns completely, so this is limited to what appears
to be always safe.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60048
llvm-svn: 357382
In PR41304:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41304
...we have a case where we want to fold a binop of select-shuffle (blended) values.
Rather than try to match commuted variants of the pattern, we can canonicalize the
shuffles and check for mask equality with commuted operands.
We don't produce arbitrary shuffle masks in instcombine, but select-shuffles are a
special case that the backend is required to handle because we already canonicalize
vector select to this shuffle form.
So there should be no codegen difference from this change. It's possible that this
improves CSE in IR though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60016
llvm-svn: 357366
This may not be NFC, but I'm not sure how to expose any diffs in
tests. In theory, it should be slightly more efficient and possibly
more profitable to do the canonicalizations (which can increase the
undef elements in the mask) ahead of SimplifyDemandedVectorElts().
llvm-svn: 357272
Philip Reames