D104406 introduced an error in which, if there are multiple matchings rules for a given path, lldb was only checking for the validity in the filesystem of the first match instead of looking exhaustively one by one until a valid file is found.
Besides that, a call to consume_front was being done incorrectly, as it was modifying the input, which renders subsequent matches incorrect.
I added a test that checks for both cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106723
Use realpath() when spawning the executable create_after_attach
to workaround a FreeBSD plugin (and possibly others) problem.
If the executable is started via a path containing a symlink, it is
added to the module list twice -- via the real and apparent path.
This in turn cases the requested breakpoint to resolve twice.
Use realpath() for main program path in lldb-vscode breakpoint tests
to workaround a similar problem. If the passed path does not match
the realpath, lldb-vscode does not report the breakpoints as verified
and causes tests to fail.
Since the underlying problems are non-trivial to fix and the purpose
of these tests is not to reproduce symlink problems, let's apply
trivial workarounds to make them pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97230
Per the DAP spec for SetBreakpoints [1], the way to clear breakpoints is: `To clear all breakpoint for a source, specify an empty array.`
However, leaving the breakpoints field unset is also a well formed request (note the `breakpoints?:` in the `SetBreakpointsArguments` definition). If it's unset, we have a couple choices:
1. Crash (current behavior)
2. Clear breakpoints
3. Return an error response that the breakpoints field is missing.
I propose we do (2) instead of (1), and treat an unset breakpoints field the same as an empty breakpoints field.
[1] https://microsoft.github.io/debug-adapter-protocol/specification#Requests_SetBreakpoints
Reviewed By: wallace, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88513
Summary:
When using source maps for a breakpoint, in order to find the actual source that breakpoint has resolved, we
need to use a query similar to what CommandObjectSource::DumpLinesInSymbolContexts does, which is the logic
used by the CLI to display the source line at a given breakpoint. That's necessary because from a breakpoint
location you only have an address, which points to the original source location, not the source mapped one.
in the setBreakpoints request handler, we haven't been doing such query and we were returning the original
source location, which was breaking the UX of VSCode, as many breakpoints were being set but not displayed
in the source file next to each line. Besides, clicking the source path of a breakpoint in the breakpoints
view in the debug tab was not working for this case, as VSCode was trying to open a non-existent file, thus
showing an error to the user.
Ideally, we should do the query mentioned above to find the actual source location to respond to the IDE,
however, that query is expensive and users can have an arbitrary number of breakpoints set. As a simpler fix,
the request sent by VSCode already contains the full source path, which exists because the user set it from
the IDE itself, so we can simply reuse it instead of querying from the SB API.
I wrote a test for this, and found out that I had to move SetSourceMapFromArguments after RunInitCommands in
lldb-vscode.cpp, because an init command used in all tests is `settings clear -all`, which would clear the
source map unless specified after initCommands. And in any case, I think it makes sense to have initCommands
run before anything the debugger would do.
Reviewers: clayborg, kusmour, labath, aadsm
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76968
Summary:
The DAP specifies the following for the SetBreakpoints request:
The breakpoints returned are in the same order as the elements of the 'breakpoints' arguments
This was not followed, as lldb-vscode was returning the breakpoints in a different order, because they were first stored into a map, and then traversed. Of course, maps normally don't preserve ordering.
See this log I captured:
-->
{"command":"setBreakpoints",
"arguments":{
"source":{
"name":"main.cpp",
"path":"/Users/wallace/fbsource/xplat/sand/test-projects/buck-cpp/main.cpp"
},
"lines":[6,10,11],
"breakpoints":[{"line":6},{"line":10},{"line":11}],
"sourceModified":false
},
"type":"request",
"seq":3
}
<--
{"body":{
"breakpoints":[
{"id":1, "line":11,"source":{"name":"main.cpp","path":"xplat/sand/test-projects/buck-cpp/main.cpp"},"verified":true},
{"id":2,"line":6,"source":{"name":"main.cpp","path":"xplat/sand/test-projects/buck-cpp/main.cpp"},"verified":true},
{"id":3,"line":10,"source":{"name":"main.cpp","path":"xplat/sand/test-projects/buck-cpp/main.cpp"},"verified":true}]},
"command":"setBreakpoints",
"request_seq":3,
"seq":0,
"success":true,
"type":"response"
}
As you can see, the order was not respected. This was causing the IDE not to be able to disable/enable breakpoints by clicking on them in the breakpoint view in the lower corner of the Debug tab.
This diff fixes the ordering problem. The traversal + querying was done very fast in O(nlogn) time. I'm keeping the same complexity.
I also updated a couple of tests to account for the ordering.
Reviewers: clayborg, aadsm, kusmour, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76891
Summary:
The error message from the construct `assertTrue(a == b, "msg") ` are nearly always completely useless for actually debugging the issue.
This patch is just replacing this construct (and similar ones like `assertTrue(a != b, ...)` with the proper call to assertEqual or assertNotEquals.
This patch was mostly written by a shell script with some manual verification afterwards:
```
lang=python
import sys
def sanitize_line(line):
if line.strip().startswith("self.assertTrue(") and " == " in line:
line = line.replace("self.assertTrue(", "self.assertEquals(")
line = line.replace(" == ", ", ", 1)
if line.strip().startswith("self.assertTrue(") and " != " in line:
line = line.replace("self.assertTrue(", "self.assertNotEqual(")
line = line.replace(" != ", ", ", 1)
return line
for a in sys.argv[1:]:
with open(a, "r") as f:
lines = f.readlines()
with open(a, "w") as f:
for line in lines:
f.write(sanitize_line(line))
```
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74475
Summary: Moves lldbsuite tests to lldb/test/API.
This is a largely mechanical change, moved with the following steps:
```
rm lldb/test/API/testcases
mkdir -p lldb/test/API/{test_runner/test,tools/lldb-{server,vscode}}
mv lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/test_runner/test lldb/test/API/test_runner
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/* -maxdepth 0 -type d | egrep -v "make|plugins|test_runner|tools"); do mv $d lldb/test/API; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-vscode -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | grep -v ".py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-vscode; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | egrep -v "gdbremote_testcase.py|lldbgdbserverutils.py|socket_packet_pump.py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server; done
```
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/__init__.py and lldb/test/API/lit.cfg.py were also updated with the new directory structure.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71151
Walter Erquinigo