The Mips in DW_LANG_Mips_Assembler is a vendor name not an
architecture name and in lack of a proper generic DW_LANG_assembler,
some assemblers emit DWARF using this tag. Due to a warning I recently
introduced users will now be greeted with
This version of LLDB has no plugin for the mipsassem language. Inspection of frame variables will be limited.
By renaming this to just "Assembler" this error message will make more sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101406
rdar://77214764
When I added TestAbortExitCode I actually planned this to be a generic test for the
exit code functionality on POSIX systems. However due to all the different test setups we
can have I don't think this worked out. Right now the test had to be made so permissive
that it pretty much can't fail.
Just to summarize, we would need to support the following situations:
1. ToT debugserver (on macOS)
2. lldb-server (on other platforms)
3. Any old debugserver version when using the system debugserver (on macOS)
This patch is removing TestAbortExitCode and adds a ToT debugserver specific test
that checks the patch that motivated the whole exit code testing. There is already
an exit-code test for lldb-server from what I can see and 3) is pretty much untestable
as we don't know anything about the system debugserver.
Reviewed By: kastiglione
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89305
This test
On macOS, this test can instead return `status = 0 (0x00000000) Terminated due to signal 6`. This updates the `CHECK` accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89273
The test only checks the exit code that the debug server sends back, but
not the following explanation which is different for debugserver and lldb-server.
If our process terminates due to an unhandled signal, we are supposed to get the
signal code via WTERMSIG. However, we instead try to get the exit status via
WEXITSTATUS which just ends up always calculating signal code 0 (at least on the
macOS implementation where it just shifts the signal code bits away and we're
left with only 0 bits).
The exit status calculation on the LLDB side also seems a bit off as it claims
an exit status that is just the signal code (instead of for example 128 + signal
code), but that will be another patch.
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86336
This patchs adds an optional warning that is printed when stopped at a
frame that was compiled in a source language that LLDB has no plugin
for.
The motivational use-case is debugging Swift code on Linux. When the
user accidentally invokes the system LLDB that was built without the
Swift plugin, it is very much non-obvious why debugging doesnt
work. This warning makes it easy to figure out what went wrong.
<rdar://problem/56986569>
SB API clients can describe the failure message in a more natural
way for their UI, this doesn't add information for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74585
<rdar://problem/49953304>
Summary:
This patch addresses an ambiguity in how our existing tests invoke the
compiler. Roughly two thirds of our current "shell" tests invoke the
compiler to build the executables for the host. However, there is also
a significant number of tests which don't build a host binary (because
they don't need to run it) and instead they hardcode a certain target.
We also have code which adds a bunch of default arguments to the %clang
substitutions. However, most of these arguments only really make sense
for the host compilation. So far, this has worked mostly ok, because the
arguments we were adding were not conflicting with the target-hardcoding
tests (though they did provoke an occasional "argument unused" warning).
However, this started to break down when we wanted to use
target-hardcoding clang-cl tests (D69031) because clang-cl has a
substantially different command line, and it was getting very confused
by some of the arguments we were adding on non-windows hosts.
This patch avoid this problem by creating separate %clang(xx,_cl)_host
substutitions, which are specifically meant to be used for compiling
host binaries. All funny host-specific options are moved there. To
ensure that the regular %clang substitutions are not used for compiling
host binaries (skipping the extra arguments) I employ a little
hac^H^H^Htrick -- I add an invalid --target argument to the %clang
substitution, which means that one has to use an explicit --target in
order for the compilation to succeed.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, mstorsjo, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, jfb, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69619
This can e.g. happen if the debugged executable exits before the initial
stop, e.g. if it fails to load dependent DLLs.
Add a virtual destructor to ProcessDebugger and let it clean up the
session, and make ProcessWindows::OnExitProcess call
ProcessDebugger::OnExitProcess for shared parts.
Fix suggestion by Adrian McCarthy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69503
LLDB has three major testing strategies: unit tests, tests that exercise
the SB API though dotest.py and what we currently call lit tests. The
later is rather confusing as we're now using lit as the driver for all
three types of tests. As most of this grew organically, the directory
structure in the LLDB repository doesn't really make this clear.
The 'lit' tests are part of the root and among these tests there's a
Unit and Suite folder for the unit and dotest-tests. This layout makes
it impossible to run just the lit tests.
This patch changes the directory layout to match the 3 testing
strategies, each with their own directory and their own configuration
file. This means there are now 3 directories under lit with 3
corresponding targets:
- API (check-lldb-api): Test exercising the SB API.
- Shell (check-lldb-shell): Test exercising command line utilities.
- Unit (check-lldb-unit): Unit tests.
Finally, there's still the `check-lldb` target that runs all three test
suites.
Finally, this also renames the lit folder to `test` to match the LLVM
repository layout.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68606
llvm-svn: 374184
Adrian Prantl