Currently all AA analyses marked as preserved are stateless, not taking
into account their dependent analyses. So there's no need to mark them
as preserved, they won't be invalidated unless their analyses are.
SCEVAAResults was the one exception to this, it was treated like a
typical analysis result. Make it like the others and don't invalidate
unless SCEV is invalidated.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102032
This patch updates performSymbolicPredicateInfoEvaluation to manage
registering additional dependencies using ExprResult. Similar to D99987,
this fixes an issues where we failed to track the correct dependency for
a phi-of-ops value, which is marked as temporary.
Fixes PR49873.
Reviewed By: asbirlea, ruiling
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100560
performSymbolicEvaluation is used to obtain the symbolic expression when
visiting instructions and this is used to determine their congruence
class.
performSymbolicEvaluation only creates expressions for certain
instructions (via createExpression). For unsupported instructions,
'unknown' expression are created.
The use of createExpression in processOutgoingEdges means we may
simplify the condition in processOutgoingEdges to a constant in the
initial round of processing, but we use Unknown(I) for the congruence
class. If an operand of I changes the expression Unknown(I) stays the
same, so there is no update of the congruence class of I. Hence it
won't get re-visited. So if an operand of I changes in a way that causes
createExpression to return different result, this update is missed.
This patch updates the code to use performSymbolicEvaluation, to be
symmetric with the congruence class updating code.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99990
This recommits 4f5da356ff, including
explicit implementations of move a constructor and deleted copy
constructors/assignment operators, to fix failures with some compilers.
This reverts the revert 74854d00e8.
If we are using a simplified value, we need to add an extra
dependency this value , because changes to the class of the
simplified value may require us to invalidate any decision based on
that value.
This is done by adding such values as additional users, however the
current code does not excludes temporary instructions.
At the moment, this means that we miss those dependencies for
phi-of-ops, because they are temporary instructions at this point. We
instead need to add the extra dependencies to the root instruction of
the phi-of-ops.
This patch pushes the responsibility of adding extra users to the
callers of createExpression & performSymbolicEvaluation. At those
points, it is clearer which real instruction to pick.
Alternatively we could either pass the 'real' instruction as additional
argument or use another map, but I think the approach in the patch makes
things a bit easier to follow.
Fixes PR35074.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99987
If the PHI-of-ops simplifies to an existing value, no real PHI is
created, which means the dependencies between the
PHI-of-ops and its operands is not materialized in IR. At the
moment, we fail to create a real PHI node for the PHI-of-ops,
because the PHI-of-ops root instruction is not re-visited if
one of the PHI-of-ops operands changes. We need to add the
operands as additional users in this case.
Even with this patch, there are still some dependencies
missing. I will continue tackling the outstanding
reporeted crashes in this area.
Fixes PR36501, PR42422, PR42557.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66924
Avoid having to instantiate and compile a subset of the dominator tree logic
separately for each node type. More importantly, this allows generic
algorithms to be built on top of dominator trees without writing them as
templates -- such algorithms can now use opaque CfgBlockRef and
CfgInterface instead.
A type-erased implementation of dominator trees could be written in
terms of CfgInterface as well, but doing so would change the current
trade-off: it would slightly reduce code size at the cost of a slight
runtime overhead.
This patch does not change the trade-off, as it only does type-erasure
where basic blocks can be treated in a fully opaque way, i.e. it only
moves methods that don't require iteration over CFG successors and
predecessors.
v5:
- rename generic_{begin,end,children} back without the generic_ prefix
and refer explictly to base class methods in NewGVN, which wants to
mutate the order of dominator tree node children directly
v6:
- style change: iDom -> idom; it's arguable whether this is really
invalid, since it is actually standard camelCase, but clang-tidy
complains about it so... *shrug*
- rename {to,from}Generic -> {wrap,unwrap}Ref
Change-Id: Ib860dc04cf8bb093d8ed00be7def40d662213672
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83089
The 1st try was reverted because I missed an assert that
needed softening.
As discussed in D86798 / rG09652721 , we were potentially
returning a different result for whether an Instruction
is commutable depending on if we call the base class or
derived class method.
This requires relaxing asserts in GVN, but that pass
seems to be working otherwise.
NewGVN requires more work because it uses different
code paths for numbering binops and calls.
As discussed in D86798 / rG09652721 , we were potentially
returning a different result for whether an Instruction
is commutable depending on if we call the base class or
derived class method.
This requires relaxing an assert in GVN, but that pass
seems to be working otherwise.
NewGVN requires more work because it uses different
code paths for numbering binops and calls.
Making use of undef is not safe if the simplification result is not used
to replace all uses of the result. This leads to problems in NewGVN,
which does not replace all uses in the IR directly. See PR33165 for more
details.
This patch adds an option to SimplifyQuery to disable the use of undef.
Note that I've only guarded uses if isa<UndefValue>/m_Undef where
SimplifyQuery is currently available. If we agree on the general
direction, I'll update the remaining uses.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84792
Both users of predicteinfo (NewGVN and SCCP) are interested in
getting a cmp constraint on the predicated value. They currently
implement separate logic for this. This patch adds a common method
for this in PredicateBase.
This enables a missing bit of PredicateInfo handling in SCCP: Now
the predicate on the condition itself is also used. For switches
it means we know that the switched-on value is the same as the case
value. For assumes/branches we know that the condition is true or
false.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83640
Each concrete instance of a predicate has a condition (also noted in the
original PredicateBase comment) and to me it seems like there is no
clear benefit of having both PredicateBase and PredicateWithCondition
and they can be folded together.
Reviewers: nikic, efriedma
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84089
Summary:
Avoid exposing details about how children are stored. This will enable
subsequent type-erasure changes.
New methods are introduced to cover common access patterns.
Change-Id: Idb5f4b1b9c84e4cc71ddb39bb52a388682f5674f
Reviewers: arsenm, RKSimon, mehdi_amini, courbet
Subscribers: qcolombet, sdardis, wdng, hiraditya, jrtc27, zzheng, atanasyan, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83083
The patch introduces the system to distinctively store the information
needed for the Control Flow Graph as well as the instrumentary needed for
the follow-up changes: BlockFrequencyInfo and BranchProbabilityInfo.
The patch is a part of sequence of three patches, related to graphs Heat Coloring.
Reviewers: rcorcs, apilipenko, davidxl, sfertile, fedor.sergeev, eraman, bollu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76820
Instead, represent the mask as out-of-line data in the instruction. This
should be more efficient in the places that currently use
getShuffleVector(), and paves the way for further changes to add new
shuffles for scalable vectors.
This doesn't change the syntax in textual IR. And I don't currently plan
to change the bitcode encoding in this patch, although we'll probably
need to do something once we extend shufflevector for scalable types.
I expect that once this is finished, we can then replace the raw "mask"
with something more appropriate for scalable vectors. Not sure exactly
what this looks like at the moment, but there are a few different ways
we could handle it. Maybe we could try to describe specific shuffles.
Or maybe we could define it in terms of a function to convert a fixed-length
array into an appropriate scalable vector, using a "step", or something
like that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72467
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
Check that a call has an attached MemoryAccess before calling
getClobbering on the instruction.
If no access is attached, the instruction does not access memory.
Resolves PR43441.
llvm-svn: 374920
Doing this makes MSVC complain that `empty(someRange)` could refer to
either C++17's std::empty or LLVM's llvm::empty, which previously we
avoided via SFINAE because std::empty is defined in terms of an empty
member rather than begin and end. So, switch callers over to the new
method as it is added.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68439
llvm-svn: 373935
Summary:
This is the first change to enable the TLI to be built per-function so
that -fno-builtin* handling can be migrated to use function attributes.
See discussion on D61634 for background. This is an enabler for fixing
handling of these options for LTO, for example.
This change should not affect behavior, as the provided function is not
yet used to build a specifically per-function TLI, but rather enables
that migration.
Most of the changes were very mechanical, e.g. passing a Function to the
legacy analysis pass's getTLI interface, or in Module level cases,
adding a callback. This is similar to the way the per-function TTI
analysis works.
There was one place where we were looking for builtins but not in the
context of a specific function. See FindCXAAtExit in
lib/Transforms/IPO/GlobalOpt.cpp. I'm somewhat concerned my workaround
could provide the wrong behavior in some corner cases. Suggestions
welcome.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, jvesely, nhaehnle, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, aheejin, steven_wu, george.burgess.iv, dexonsmith, jfb, asbirlea, gchatelet, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66428
llvm-svn: 371284
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
The AllConstant check needs to be moved out of the if/else if chain to
avoid a test regression. The "there is no SimplifyZExt" comment
puzzles me, since there is SimplifyCastInst. Additionally, the
Simplify* calls seem to not see the operand as constant, so this needs
to be tried if the simplify failed.
llvm-svn: 362653
This adds a WithOverflowInst class with a few helper methods to get
the underlying binop, signedness and nowrap type and makes use of it
where sensible. There will be two more uses in D60650/D60656.
The refactorings are all NFC, though I left some TODOs where things
could be improved. In particular we have two places where add/sub are
handled but mul isn't.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60668
llvm-svn: 358512
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The current code relies on LeaderUseCount to determine if we can remove
an SSA copy, but in that the LeaderUseCount does not refer to the SSA
copy. If a SSA copy is a dominating leader, we use the operand as dominating
leader instead. This means we removed a user of a ssa copy and we should
decrement its use count, so we can remove the ssa copy once it becomes dead.
Fixes PR38804.
Reviewers: efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51595
llvm-svn: 349217
If we simplify an instruction to itself, we do not need to add a user to
itself. For congruence classes with a defining expression, we already
use a similar logic.
Fixes PR38259.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mcrosier
Reviewed By: davide
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51168
llvm-svn: 346335
Currently eliminateInstructions only returns true if any instruction got
replaced. In the test case for this patch, we eliminate the trivially
dead calls, for which eliminateInstructions not do a replacement and the
function is not marked as changed, which is why the inliner crashes
while traversing the call graph.
Alternatively we could also change eliminateInstructions to return true
in case we mark instructions for deletion, but that's slightly more code
and doing it at the place where the replacement happens seems safer.
Fixes PR37517.
Reviewers: davide, mcrosier, efriedma, bjope
Reviewed By: bjope
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51169
llvm-svn: 341651
Arthur Eubanks