The data layout strings do not have any effect on llc tests and will become
misleadingly out of date as we continue to update the canonical data layout, so
remove them from the tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105842
This to protect against non-sensical instruction sequences being assembled,
which would either cause asserts/crashes further down, or a Wasm module being output that doesn't validate.
Unlike a validator, this type checker is able to give type-errors as part of the parsing process, which makes the assembler much friendlier to be used by humans writing manual input.
Because the MC system is single pass (instructions aren't even stored in MC format, they are directly output) the type checker has to be single pass as well, which means that from now on .globaltype and .functype decls must come before their use. An extra pass is added to Codegen to collect information for this purpose, since AsmPrinter is normally single pass / streaming as well, and would otherwise generate this information on the fly.
A `-no-type-check` flag was added to llvm-mc (and any other tools that take asm input) that surpresses type errors, as a quick escape hatch for tests that were not intended to be type correct.
This is a first version of the type checker that ignores control flow, i.e. it checks that types are correct along the linear path, but not the branch path. This will still catch most errors. Branch checking could be added in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104945
Summary:
This makes it easier/cleaner to generate a single signature from
this directive. Also:
- Adds the symbol name, such that we don't depend on the location
of this directive anymore.
- Actually constructs the signature in the assembler, and make the
assembler own it.
- Refactor the use of MVT vs ValType in the streamer and assembler
to require less conversions overall.
- Changed 700 or so tests to use it.
Reviewers: sbc100, dschuff
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, eraman, aheejin, sunfish, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54652
llvm-svn: 347228
In one case probably you have be using it, in the other it
looks like it was redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54644
llvm-svn: 347098
Summary:
Made it convert from register to stack based instructions, and removed the registers.
Fixes to related code that was expecting register based instructions.
Added the correct testing flag to all tests, depending on what the
format they were expecting so far.
Translated one test to stack format as example: reg-stackify-stack.ll
tested:
llvm-lit -v `find test -name WebAssembly`
unittests/MC/*
Reviewers: dschuff, sunfish
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, aheejin, llvm-commits, jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51241
llvm-svn: 340750
Summary:
Moved Explicit Locals pass to last.
Made that pass obligatory.
Made it convert from register to stack based instructions, and removed the registers.
Fixes to related code that was expecting register based instructions.
Added the correct testing flag to all tests, depending on what the
format they were expecting so far.
Translated one test to stack format as example: reg-stackify-stack.ll
tested:
llvm-lit -v `find test -name WebAssembly`
unittests/MC/*
Reviewers: dschuff, sunfish
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits, aheejin, eraman, jgravelle-google, sbc100
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50568
llvm-svn: 339474
Summary:
Moved Explicit Locals pass to last.
Made that pass obligatory.
Made it convert from register to stack based instructions, and removed the registers.
Fixes to related code that was expecting register based instructions.
Added the correct testing flag to all tests, depending on what the
format they were expecting so far.
Translated one test to stack format as example: reg-stackify-stack.ll
tested:
llvm-lit -v `find test -name WebAssembly`
unittests/MC/*
Reviewers: dschuff, sunfish
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, aheejin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49160
llvm-svn: 338164
Under emscripten, C code can take the address of a function implemented
in Javascript (which is exposed via an import in wasm). Because imports
do not have linear memory address in wasm, we need to generate a thunk
to be the target of the indirect call; it call the import directly.
To make this possible, LLVM needs to emit the type signatures for these
functions, because they may not be called directly or referred to other
than where the address is taken.
This uses s new .s directive (.functype) which specifies the signature.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20891
Re-apply r271599 but instead of bailing with an error when a declared
function has multiple returns, replace it with a pointer argument. Also
add the test case I forgot to 'git add' last time around.
llvm-svn: 271703
This reverts r271599, it broke the integration tests.
More places than I expected had nontrival return types in imports, or
else the check was wrong.
llvm-svn: 271606
Under emscripten, C code can take the address of a function implemented
in Javascript (which is exposed via an import in wasm). Because imports
do not have linear memory address in wasm, we need to generate a thunk
to be the target of the indirect call; it call the import directly.
To make this possible, LLVM needs to emit the type signatures for these
functions, because they may not be called directly or referred to other
than where the address is taken.
This uses s new .s directive (.functype) which specifies the signature.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20891
llvm-svn: 271599
Thomas Lively