This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert
it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I
converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).
Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue
printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid
test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.
This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing
the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The
parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal
without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a
type.
Fix the ARM backend's analyzeBranch so it doesn't ignore predicated
return instructions, and make the MachineVerifier rule more strict.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40061
Move ARM ConstantIsland and LowOverheadLopps passes later in the pipeline
such that they will be run after the upcoming Machine Outlining pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76065
As a narrow stopgap for the assertion failure described in PR45025, add
a describeLoadedValue override to ARMBaseInstrInfo and use it to detect
copies in which the forwarding reg is a super/sub reg of the copy
destination. For the moment this is unsupported.
Several follow ups are possible:
1) Handle VORRq. At the moment, we do not, because isCopyInstrImpl
returns early when !MI.isMoveReg().
2) In the case where forwarding reg is a super-reg of the copy
destination, we should be able to describe the forwarding reg as a
subreg within the copy destination. I'm not 100% sure about this, but
it looks like that's what's done in AArch64InstrInfo.
3) In the case where the forwarding reg is a sub-reg of the copy
destination, maybe we could describe the forwarding reg using the
copy destinaion and a DW_OP_LLVM_fragment (I guess this should be
possible after D75036).
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45025
rdar://59772698
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75273
This adds infrastructure to print and parse MIR MachineOperand comments.
The motivation for the ARM backend is to print condition code names instead of
magic constants that are difficult to read (for human beings). For example,
instead of this:
dead renamable $r2, $cpsr = tEOR killed renamable $r2, renamable $r1, 14, $noreg
t2Bcc %bb.4, 0, killed $cpsr
we now print this:
dead renamable $r2, $cpsr = tEOR killed renamable $r2, renamable $r1, 14 /* CC::always */, $noreg
t2Bcc %bb.4, 0 /* CC:eq */, killed $cpsr
This shows that MachineOperand comments are enclosed between /* and */. In this
example, the EOR instruction is not conditionally executed (i.e. it is "always
executed"), which is encoded by the 14 immediate machine operand. Thus, now
this machine operand has /* CC::always */ as a comment. The 0 on the next
conditional branch instruction represents the equal condition code, thus now
this operand has /* CC:eq */ as a comment.
As it is a comment, the MI lexer/parser completely ignores it. The benefit is
that this keeps the change in the lexer extremely minimal and no target
specific parsing needs to be done. The changes on the MIPrinter side are also
minimal, as there is only one target hooks that is used to create the machine
operand comments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74306
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
This patch fixes an assertion failure in DwarfExpression that is
triggered when a complex fragment has exactly the size of a
subregister of the register the DBG_VALUE points to *and* there is no
DWARF encoding for the super-register.
I took the opportunity to replace/document some magic values with
static constructor functions to make this code less confusing to read.
rdar://problem/58489125
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72938
The idea is to remove front-end analysis for the parameter's value
modification and leave it to the value tracking system. Front-end in some
cases marks a parameter as modified even the line of code that modifies the
parameter gets optimized, that implies that this will cover more entry
values even. In addition, extending the support for modified parameters
will be easier with this approach.
Since the goal is to recognize if a parameter’s value has changed, the idea
at very high level is: If we encounter a DBG_VALUE other than the entry
value one describing the same variable (parameter), we can assume that the
variable’s value has changed and we should not track its entry value any
more. That would be ideal scenario, but due to various LLVM optimizations,
a variable’s value could be just moved around from one register to another
(and there will be additional DBG_VALUEs describing the same variable), so
we have to recognize such situation (otherwise, we will lose a lot of entry
values) and salvage the debug entry value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68209
DwarfExpression::addMachineReg() knows how to build a larger register
that isn't expressible in DWARF by combining multiple
subregisters. However, if the entire value fits into just one
subregister, it would still emit the other subregisters, leading to
all sorts of inconsistencies down the line.
This patch fixes that by moving an already existing(!) check whether
the subregister's offset is before the end of the value to the right
place.
rdar://problem/57294211
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70508
Summary:
Entry values are considered for parameters that have register-described
DBG_VALUEs in the entry block (along with other conditions).
If a parameter's value has been propagated from the caller to the
callee, then the parameter's DBG_VALUE in the entry block may be
described using a register defined by some instruction, and entry values
should not be emitted for the parameter, which can currently occur.
One such case was seen in the attached test case, in which the second
parameter, which is described by a redefinition of the first parameter's
register, would incorrectly get an entry value using the first
parameter's register. This commit intends to solve such cases by keeping
track of register defines, and ignoring DBG_VALUEs in the entry block
that are described by such registers.
In a RelWithDebInfo build of clang-8, the average size of the set was
27, and in a RelWithDebInfo+ASan build it was 30.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69889
During the If-Converter optimization pay attention when copying or
deleting call instructions in order to keep call site information in
valid state.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, efriedma
Reviewed By: vsk, efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66955
llvm-svn: 374068
Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945 for reference,
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67433
llvm-svn: 371608
This patch changes MIR stack-id from an integer to an enum,
and adds printing/parsing support for this in MIR files. The default
stack-id '0' is now renamed to 'default'.
This should make MIR tests that have stack objects with different stack-ids
more descriptive. It also clarifies code operating on StackID.
Reviewers: arsenm, thegameg, qcolombet
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60137
llvm-svn: 363533
Summary:
When DwarfDebug::buildLocationList() encountered an undef debug value,
it would truncate all open values, regardless if they were overlapping or
not. This patch fixes so that it only does that for overlapping fragments.
This change unearthed a bug that I had introduced in D57511,
which I have fixed in this patch. The code in DebugHandlerBase that
changes labels for parameter debug values could break DwarfDebug's
assumption that the labels for the entries in the debug value history
are monotonically increasing. Before this patch, that bug could result
in location list entries whose ending address was lower than the
beginning address, and with the changes for undef debug values that this
patch introduces it could trigger an assertion, due to attempting to
emit location list entries with empty ranges. A reproducer for the bug
is added in param-reg-const-mix.mir.
Reviewers: aprantl, jmorse, probinson
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62379
llvm-svn: 361820
The debug-use flag must be set exactly for uses on DBG_VALUEs. This is
so obvious that it can be trivially inferred while parsing. This will
reduce noise when printing while omitting an information that has little
value to the user.
The parser will keep recognizing the flag for compatibility with old
`.mir` files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53903
llvm-svn: 345671
During the execution of long functions or functions that have a lot of
inlined code it could come to the situation where tracked value could be
transferred from one register to another. The transfer is recognized only if
destination register is a callee saved register and if source register is
killed. We do not salvage caller-saved registers since there is a great
chance that killed register would outlive it.
Patch by Nikola Prica.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44016
llvm-svn: 336978
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
As discussed on llvm-dev in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-September/117301.html
this changes the command line interface of llvm-dwarfdump to match the
one used by the dwarfdump utility shipping on macOS. In addition to
being shorter to type this format also has the advantage of allowing
more than one section to be specified at the same time.
In a nutshell, with this change
$ llvm-dwarfdump --debug-dump=info
$ llvm-dwarfdump --debug-dump=apple-objc
becomes
$ dwarfdump --debug-info --apple-objc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37714
llvm-svn: 312970
Summary:
Based on Fred's patch here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D6771
I can't seem to commandeer the old review, so I'm creating a new one.
With that change the locations exrpessions are pretty printed inline in the
DIE tree. The output looks like this for debug_loc entries:
DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_data4] (0x00000000
0x0000000000000001 - 0x000000000000000b: DW_OP_consts +3
0x000000000000000b - 0x0000000000000012: DW_OP_consts +7
0x0000000000000012 - 0x000000000000001b: DW_OP_reg0 RAX, DW_OP_piece 0x4
0x000000000000001b - 0x0000000000000024: DW_OP_breg5 RDI+0)
And like this for debug_loc.dwo entries:
DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000000
Addr idx 2 (w/ length 190): DW_OP_consts +0, DW_OP_stack_value
Addr idx 3 (w/ length 23): DW_OP_reg0 RAX, DW_OP_piece 0x4)
Simple locations without ranges are printed inline:
DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_block1] (DW_OP_reg4 RSI, DW_OP_piece 0x4, DW_OP_bit_piece 0x20 0x0)
The debug_loc(.dwo) dumping in changed accordingly to factor the code.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, friss
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, hiraditya, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37123
llvm-svn: 312042
Summary:
MIRParserImpl::computeFunctionProperties uses MRI.getNumVirtRegs() to
set the NoVReg property. By adding a bunch of registers to the MIR test
cases, the NoVReg property is not set when importing the MIR. Otherwise
NoVReg is set after instruction selection while the machine instructions
still contain virtual registers, causing expensive checks to fail.
Reviewers: efriedma, MatzeB, aprantl
Reviewed By: MatzeB, aprantl
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36152
llvm-svn: 310178
Summary:
This patch is part of 3 patches that together form a single patch, but must be introduced in stages in order not to break things.
The way that LLVM interprets DW_OP_plus in DIExpression nodes is basically that of the DW_OP_plus_uconst operator since LLVM expects an unsigned constant operand. This unnecessarily restricts the DW_OP_plus operator, preventing it from being used to describe the evaluation of runtime values on the expression stack. These patches try to align the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus with that of the DWARF definition, which pops two elements off the expression stack, performs the operation and pushes the result back on the stack.
This is done in three stages:
• The first patch (LLVM) adds support for DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The second patch (Clang) contains changes all its uses from DW_OP_plus to DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The third patch (LLVM) changes the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus to be in line with its DWARF meaning. This patch includes the bitcode upgrade from legacy DIExpressions.
Patch by Sander de Smalen.
Reviewers: echristo, pcc, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: fhahn, javed.absar, aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33894
llvm-svn: 305386
If a register location can only be described by a complex expression
(i.e., multiple subregisters) it doesn't safely compose with another
complex expression. For example, it is not possible to apply a
DW_OP_deref operation to multiple DW_OP_pieces.
llvm-svn: 298472
If a register location can only be described by a complex expression
(i.e., multiple subregisters) it doesn't safely compose with another
complex expression. For example, it is not possible to apply a
DW_OP_deref operation to multiple DW_OP_pieces.
llvm-svn: 298389
LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a
misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset
argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location
that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset
into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the
DWARF specification.
This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct
offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly
emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable,
thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression.
While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this
to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the
correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are
gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if
individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't
interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present
undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an
old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly,
because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at
the top of the stack.
As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient
encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a
non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the
value into place manually.
This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't
exercised before.
<rdar://problem/29335809>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550
llvm-svn: 289266
Matt Arsenault